Interactivity and presence of three eHealth interventions

A number of researchers have identified interactivity and presence as potentially important attributes of e-Health applications, because they are believed to influence users to interact with systems in ways that increase commitment, learning, and other desirable responses. This paper reports on the development of brief scales to assess the two concepts, and on use of them with participants in six conditions of a large-scale trial of interventions for breast cancer patients. Overall, the Internet scored very low on both measures. Versions of an integrated system of services (CHESS) scored higher, particularly as conditions added features to different versions of the system. Interventions involving a human Cancer Information Mentor scored highest, though even the Mentor was perceived as more interactive and having more presence when combined with the integrated eHealth system.

[1]  Ulrika Josefsson,et al.  Patients' Online Information-Seeking Behavior , 2006 .

[2]  David B Buller,et al.  Attributes of Interactive Online Health Information Systems , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[3]  D. Tulsky,et al.  The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  Bret R. Shaw,et al.  Use and Impact of eHealth System by Low-income Women With Breast Cancer , 2005, Journal of health communication.

[5]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  The internet and health care : theory, research, and practice , 2006 .

[6]  Suzanne Pingree,et al.  Internet-Based Interactive Support for Cancer Patients: Are Integrated Systems Better? , 2008, The Journal of communication.

[7]  D H Gustafson,et al.  Increasing understanding of patient needs during and after hospitalization. , 2001, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[8]  L. Radloff The CES-D Scale , 1977 .

[9]  D. Gustafson,et al.  Impact of a patient-centered, computer-based health information/support system. , 1999, American journal of preventive medicine.

[10]  Suzanne Pingree,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Predictors of Participation in a Computer Support Group for Women With Breast Cancer , 2006, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[11]  William P. Eveland A “Mix of Attributes” Approach to the Study of Media Effects and New Communication Technologies , 2003 .

[12]  D S Tulsky,et al.  Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  A. Beck,et al.  The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. , 2006, Clinical psychology review.

[14]  M. Gurevitch,et al.  Mass Media and Society , 1992 .

[15]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Virtual Reality Technology: A Tutorial , 1992 .

[16]  Lori L. DuBenske,et al.  The value of theory for enhancing and understanding e-health interventions. , 2010, American journal of preventive medicine.

[17]  D. Gustafson,et al.  Effect of computer support on younger women with breast cancer , 2001, Journal of General Internal Medicine.