Key performance indicators for turboelectric distributed propulsion

PurposeRecent advancements in electrified transportation have been necessitated by the need to reduce environmentally harmful emissions. Accordingly, several aviation organisations and governments have introduced stringent emission reduction targets for 2050. One of the most promising technologies proposed for achieving these targets is turboelectric distributed propulsion (TeDP). The objective of this study was to explore and identify key indicators for enhancing the applicability of TeDP in air transportation.Design/methodology/approachAn enhancement valuation method was proposed to overcome the challenges associated with TeDP in terms of technological, economic and environmental impacts. The result indicators (RIs) were determined; the associated performance indicators (PIs) were analysed and the key RIs and PIs for TeDP were identified. Quantitative measurements were acquired from a simulated TeDP case study model to estimate the established key PIs.FindingsIt was determined that real-world TeDP efficiency could be enhanced by up to 8% by optimising the identified key PIs.Originality/valueThis study is the first to identify the key PIs of TeDP and to include a techno-economic environmental risk analysis (TERA) based on the identified key PIs. The findings could guide developers and researchers towards potential focus areas to realise the adoption of TeDP.

[1]  C. Adams,et al.  Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices , 2008 .

[2]  Kaushik Rajashekara,et al.  Propulsion System Component Considerations for NASA N3-X Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion System , 2012 .

[3]  Ajay K. Misra.  Technical Challenges and Barriers Affecting Turbo-Electric and Hybrid Electric Aircraft Propulsion , 2017 .

[4]  Benjamin Schiltgen,et al.  Aeropropulsive Interaction and Thermal System Integration within the ECO-150: A Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion Airliner with Conventional Electric Machines , 2016 .

[5]  Riti Singh,et al.  Thermal cycle analysis of turboelectric distributed propulsion system with boundary layer ingestion , 2013 .

[6]  G. Lodewijks,et al.  A company performance index for motor vehicle manufacturers: company performance measurement with environmental concerns , 2020 .

[7]  Sushil,et al.  Modeling enablers of TQM to improve airline performance , 2013 .

[8]  Dian Prama Irfani,et al.  Integrating performance measurement, system dynamics, and problem-solving methods , 2019, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management.

[9]  Camilla Lundgren,et al.  Performance indicators for measuring the effects of Smart Maintenance , 2020, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management.

[10]  Arie Halachmi.  Imagined promises versus real challenges to public performance management , 2011 .

[11]  Barbara Esker.  Electric Aircraft Technology Development Overview Briefing , 2018 .

[12]  Lee W. Kohlman.  Student Design Competition: Materials and Structures for Extreme Environments , 2017 .

[13]  Daniel Ihiabe,et al.  Method to Explore the Design Space of a Turbo-Electric Distributed Propulsion System , 2016 .

[14]  Patrick Norman,et al.  A review of Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion technologies for N+3 aircraft electrical systems , 2013, 2013 48th International Universities' Power Engineering Conference (UPEC).

[15]  Louis J. Ghosn,et al.  A Computer Code for Gas Turbine Engine Weight and Disk Life Estimation , 2004 .

[16]  T. Nikolaidis,et al.  Economic and environmental viability assessment of NASA’s turboelectric distribution propulsion , 2020 .

[17]  Wr Graham,et al.  The potential of future aircraft technology for noise and pollutant emissions reduction , 2014 .

[18]  Jeffryes W. Chapman.  Multi-point Design and Optimization of a Turboshaft Engine for Tiltwing Turboelectric VTOL Air Taxi , 2019 .

[19]  I. Yazar.  Simulation of a High Fidelity Turboshaft Engine-Alternator Model for Turboelectric Propulsion System Design and Applications , 2018 .

[20]  Nicholas K. Borer,et al.  Drag Reduction Through Distributed Electric Propulsion , 2014 .

[21]  Andrew T. Wick,et al.  Integrated Aerodynamic Benefits of Distributed Propulsion , 2015 .

[22]  Gerald V. Brown,et al.  Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion Engine Cycle Analysis for Hybrid-Wing-Body Aircraft , 2009 .

[23]  Seymour Lieblein,et al.  A 20,000-Kilowatt Nuclear Turboelectric Power Supply for Manned Space Vehicles , 1959 .

[24]  M. Crema,et al.  Risk indicators for managing the energy procurement process , 2015 .

[25]  Gerald V. Brown,et al.  Partially Turboelectric Aircraft Drive Key Performance Parameters , 2017 .

[26]  Benjamin B. Choi,et al.  Propulsion Electric Grid Simulator (PEGS) for Future Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion Aircraft , 2014 .

[27]  Graeme Burt,et al.  A method for the evaluation of the effectiveness of turboelectric distributed propulsion power system architectures , 2014 .

[28]  David S. Lee,et al.  Aviation and global climate change in the 21st century , 2009, Atmospheric Environment.

[29]  James L. Felder,et al.  Revolutionary Aeropropulsion Concept for Sustainable Aviation: Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion , 2013 .

[30]  Soheil Jafari,et al.  Turboelectric Uncertainty Quantification and Error Estimation in Numerical Modelling , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[31]  Arash Shahin,et al.  Prioritization of key performance indicators: An integration of analytical hierarchy process and goal setting , 2007 .

[32]  Xiaobing Li,et al.  Nuclear Power Project Performance Management System Research Based on the KPIs , 2017 .

[33]  Gerald V. Brown,et al.  Weights and Efficiencies of Electric Components of a Turboelectric Aircraft Propulsion System , 2011 .

[34]  C. Lorin,et al.  Development of a 3D Sizing Model for All-Superconducting Machines for Turbo-Electric Aircraft Propulsion , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[35]  Gerald V. Brown,et al.  An Examination of the Effect of Boundary Layer Ingestion on Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion Systems , 2011 .

[36]  Mark Drela,et al.  Preliminary Experimental Assessment of the Boundary Layer Ingestion Benefit for the D8 Aircraft , 2014 .

[37]  Gerald V. Brown,et al.  Turboelectric Aircraft Drive Key Performance Parameters and Functional Requirements , 2015 .

[38]  G. Manoochehri.  Overcoming obstacles to developing effective performance measures , 1999 .

[39]  Michael James Armstrong,et al.  Stability, Transient Response, Control, and Safety of a High-Power Electric Grid for Turboelectric Propulsion of Aircraft , 2013 .

[40]  C. E. Jones,et al.  Modelling the Fault Behaviour of a Superconducting Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion Network , 2014 .

[41]  Andrew Scobell,et al.  How China Sees America , 2012 .

[42]  A. Schäfer,et al.  Costs of mitigating CO2 emissions from passenger aircraft , 2016 .

[43]  James L. Felder.  NASA N3-X with Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion , 2014 .

[44]  Fauzia Jabeen,et al.  Enablers of green business process management in the oil and gas sector , 2020 .

[45]  James L. Felder,et al.  Turboelectric distributed propulsion benefits on the N3-X vehicle , 2014 .

[46]  C.E. Oberly.  Lightweight superconducting generators for mobile military platforms , 2006, 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[47]  Krist V. Gernaey,et al.  A framework for techno-economic & environmental sustainability analysis by risk assessment for conceptual process evaluation , 2016 .

[48]  Pericles Pilidis,et al.  Economic viability assessment of NASA's blended wing body N3-X aircraft , 2017 .

[49]  James L. Felder,et al.  Distributed Turboelectric Propulsion for Hybrid Wing Body Aircraft , 2008 .

[50]  Pericles Pilidis,et al.  Techno-economic and environmental risk analysis for advanced marine propulsion systems , 2012 .

[51]  Benjamin Schiltgen,et al.  More Electric Aircraft: "Tube and Wing" Hybrid Electric Distributed Propulsion with Superconducting and Conventional Electric Machines , 2013 .

[52]  Borys Łukasik.  Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion System As a Future Replacement for Turbofan Engines , 2017 .

[53]  Benjamin J. Brelje,et al.  Electric, hybrid, and turboelectric fixed-wing aircraft: A review of concepts, models, and design approaches , 2019, Progress in Aerospace Sciences.

[54]  Edgar Y. Choueiri,et al.  ELECTRIC PROPULSION. , 1888, Science.

[55]  James I Hileman,et al.  The costs of production of alternative jet fuel: A harmonized stochastic assessment. , 2017, Bioresource technology.

[56]  P.J. Masson,et al.  Next Generation More-Electric Aircraft: A Potential Application for HTS Superconductors , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[57]  Roelof Vos,et al.  A Method for the Conceptual Design of Hybrid Electric Aircraft , 2019, AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum.

[58]  Devaiah Nalianda,et al.  Turbo-electric distributed propulsion – opportunities, benefits and challenges , 2014 .

[59]  Sim Liew Fong,et al.  SMART KPI Management System Framework , 2019, 2019 IEEE 9th International Conference on System Engineering and Technology (ICSET).

[60]  Ruben DelRosario,et al.  A Future with Hybrid Electric Propulsion Systems: A NASA Perspective , 2014 .