Unit, vibration, tone: a post-phenomenological method for researching digital interfaces

Digital interfaces, in the form of websites, mobile apps and other platforms, now mediate user experiences with a variety of economic, cultural and political services and products. To study these digital mediations, researchers have to date followed a range of methodological strategies including the modification of pre-existing qualitative research methods, such as content analysis, discourse analysis and semiotics, among many others, and an experimentation with new methods designed to make visible the operation of data aggregation, analytics and algorithms that are hidden from users. Building upon, while distinct from these strategies, the article sets out a post-phenomenological approach to studying interfaces, websites and apps that explicitly interrogates how they appear as objects. In doing so, the article provides a response to a problem that animates contemporary cultural geography: that new cultural objects are emerging which place in question the habits and practices of analysis that composed the ‘new’ cultural geography. To do this, the paper develops the concepts of unit, vibration and tone to unpack interfaces as sets of entities that work together to shape the experiences and responses of users. As such, the article provides a methodological vocabulary for the analysis of how interfaces operate to modulate user response and action on a series of habitual and un-reflected upon levels and thereby to create outcomes that suit their owners and operators.

[1]  Ben Light,et al.  The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps , 2018, New Media Soc..

[2]  A. Leyshon,et al.  Platform capitalism: the intermediation and capitalization of digital economic circulation , 2017 .

[3]  G. Deleuze.  Postscript on the Societies of Control , 2017 .

[4]  B. Anderson,et al.  Government and (non)event: the promise of control , 2017 .

[5]  Clancy Wilmott,et al.  Small moments in Spatial Big Data: Calculability, authority and interoperability in everyday mobile mapping , 2016, Big Data Soc..

[6]  Michael Gallagher.  Sound as affect: Difference, power and spatiality , 2016 .

[7]  Jo Bates,et al.  Data journeys: Capturing the socio-material constitution of data objects and flows , 2016, Big Data Soc..

[8]  G. Rose.  Rethinking the geographies of cultural ‘objects’ through digital technologies , 2016 .

[9]  Carolin Gerlitz,et al.  Interface Methods: Renegotiating Relations between Digital Social Research, STS and Sociology , 2016 .

[10]  J. Ash,et al.  Geography and post-phenomenology , 2016 .

[11]  J. Deville,et al.  Seeing the invisible algorithm: The practical politics of tracking the credit trackers , 2015 .

[12]  Agnieszka Leszczynski,et al.  Spatial media/tion , 2015 .

[13]  J. Ash,et al.  Becoming Attuned: Objects, Affects and Embodied Methodology , 2015 .

[14]  Nathaniel O'Grady,et al.  Data Interface Security: Assembling Technologies that Govern the Future , 2015 .

[15]  Sasha Engelmann.  Toward a poetics of air: sequencing and surfacing breath , 2015 .

[16]  Federica Protti,et al.  Selfie and the City: A World-Wide, Large, and Ecologically Valid Database Reveals a Two-Pronged Side Bias in Naïve Self-Portraits , 2015, PloS one.

[17]  David Stuart,et al.  The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences , 2015, Online Inf. Rev..

[18]  Sasha Engelmann.  More-than-human affinitive listening , 2015 .

[19]  F. Al-Shamali,et al.  Author Biographies. , 2015, Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation.

[20]  Gillian Rose,et al.  Networks, Interfaces, and Computer-Generated Images: Learning from Digital Visualisations of Urban Redevelopment Projects , 2014 .

[21]  Celia Lury,et al.  Social media and self-evaluating assemblages: on numbers, orderings and values , 2014 .

[22]  R. Kitchin,et al.  Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts , 2014, Big Data Soc..

[23]  Carey Jewitt,et al.  Multimodal methods for researching digital technologies , 2013 .

[24]  Anne Helmond,et al.  The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web , 2013, New Media Soc..

[25]  Lauren I. Labrecque,et al.  Exciting red and competent blue: the importance of color in marketing , 2012 .

[26]  Nils Gustafsson,et al.  The subtle nature of Facebook politics: Swedish social network site users and political participation , 2012, New Media Soc..

[27]  Matthew W. Wilson.  Location-Based Services, Conspicuous Mobility, and the Location-Aware Future , 2012 .

[28]  Louise Amoore,et al.  Data Derivatives , 2011 .

[29]  Jennifer L. Bevan,et al.  A picture is worth a thousand words: A content analysis of Facebook profile photographs , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  Rik Crutzen,et al.  Neuro Web Design: What Makes Them Click? , 2010 .

[31]  D. Ihde.  Postphenomenology and Technoscience: The Peking University Lectures , 2009 .

[32]  Angela Cora Garcia,et al.  Ethnographic Approaches to the Internet and Computer-Mediated Communication , 2009 .

[33]  Michael Zimmer,et al.  The Externalities of Search 2.0: The Emerging Privacy Threats when the Drive for the Perfect Search Engine meets Web 2.0 , 2008, First Monday.

[34]  Elias L. Khalil,et al.  Donald MacKenzie ’ s An engine , not a camera : how financial models shape markets , 2009 .

[35]  Jonathan Murdoch,et al.  Post-structuralist Geography: A Guide to Relational Space , 2005 .

[36]  N. Thrift.  Remembering the Technological Unconscious by Foregrounding Knowledges of Position , 2004 .

[37]  Rob Kitchin,et al.  Flying through Code/Space: The Real Virtuality of Air Travel , 2004 .

[38]  J. Baker.  Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers , 1966 .

[39]  A. Diemer,et al.  [WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY?]. , 1964, Die Medizinische Welt.