Personalisation and sociability of open knowledge management based on social tagging

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyse the personalised and social characteristics of open knowledge management in higher education based on social tagging in the Web 2.0 environment.Design/methodology/approach – Through the function of annotation in social tagging, the paper analyses its personalised characteristics of recognising the preferences of participants, and its personalised‐social characteristics of enriching content from all kinds of aspects; through the function of association of social tagging, it analyses its social characteristics of social networking, and its social‐personalised characteristics of collaborative acquisition or recommendation.Findings – In the process of online information and open knowledge organisation and acquisition based on the annotation function of social tagging in the Web 2.0 environment, the personalised participation of individuals will lead to social results for everyone; however, in the process of online information and open knowledge creation and sh...

[1]  Xin Li,et al.  Tag-based social interest discovery , 2008, WWW.

[2]  Stefano Mizzaro,et al.  Collaborative annotation for context-aware retrieval , 2009, ESAIR '09.

[3]  Todd Bryant,et al.  Social Software in Academia , 2006 .

[4]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Towards a Theory of Online Learning , 2004 .

[5]  P. Anderson.  What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education , 2007 .

[6]  Kevin C. Desouza,et al.  Open knowledge management: Lessons from the open source revolution , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Tom Franklin,et al.  Web 2.0 for Content for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education , 2007 .

[8]  Rui Li,et al.  Towards effective browsing of large scale social annotations , 2007, WWW '07.

[9]  Stephen W. Liddle,et al.  Web 2.0 Learning Platform: Harnessing Collective Intelligence. , 2007 .

[10]  E. Barsky,et al.  Introducing Web 2.0: social networking and social bookmarking for health librarians , 2006 .

[11]  Bamshad Mobasher,et al.  Personalized recommendation in social tagging systems using hierarchical clustering , 2008, RecSys '08.

[12]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[13]  Richard Hall.  Towards a Fusion of Formal and Informal Learning Environments: The Impact of the Read/Write Web. , 2009 .

[14]  Mark J. W. Lee,et al.  Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era , 2007 .

[15]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Integrating Folksonomies with the Semantic Web , 2007, ESWC.

[16]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Network properties of folksonomies , 2007, AI Commun..

[17]  Bryan N. Alexander.  Web 2.0: A New Wave of Innovation for Teaching and Learning? , 2006 .

[18]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Learning by Tagging: The Role of Social Tagging in Group Knowledge Formation , 2006 .

[19]  Carl P. Lipo,et al.  Regular rates of popular culture change reflect random copying , 2007 .