Modeling Enterprise Capabilities with i*: Reasoning on Alternatives

In a dynamic world, information technology (IT) systems are expected to provide capabilities that can be used to address evolving needs. Recent work has adopted notions of capability to model how IT systems meet enterprise goals. In this paper we draw upon theories of dynamic capabilities from strategic management to model enterprise capabilities, reason on their development choices, orchestration alternatives and deployment configurations. The modeling approach builds uponi* and proposes to model capabilities as actors.i* modeling supports reasoning about intangible and tangible requirements of capabilities and trade-offs among alternatives. We illustrate with examples from the insurance industry. The examples show how social and non-functional dependencies among capabilities affect decisions about development, orchestration and configuration alternatives.

[1]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[2]  R. Duane Ireland,et al.  Resource Orchestration to Create Competitive Advantage , 2010 .

[3]  Gianmario Motta,et al.  Business Capabilities Centric Enterprise Architecture , 2010, EAI2N.

[4]  Sinan Aral,et al.  I.T. Assets, Organizational Capabilities and Firm Performance: Do Resource Allocations and Organizational Differences Explain Performance Variation? , 2007 .

[5]  Janis Stirna,et al.  Modeling Business Capabilities and Context Dependent Delivery by Cloud Services , 2013, CAiSE.

[6]  Henk Jonkers,et al.  Capturing Business Strategy and Value in Enterprise Architecture to Support Portfolio Valuation , 2012, 2012 IEEE 16th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference.

[7]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Making Intangibles “Tangible” in Tests of Resource-Based Theory , 2011 .

[8]  Varun Grover,et al.  Types of Information Technology Capabilities and Their Role in Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  J. Barney,et al.  The Future of Resource-Based Theory , 2011 .

[10]  D. Leonard-Barton CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[11]  Saggi Nevo,et al.  The Formation and Value of IT-Enabled Resources: Antecedents and Consequences of Synergistic Relationships , 2010, MIS Q..

[12]  Guy Doumeingts,et al.  Enterprise Architecture, Integration and Interoperability - IFIP TC 5 International Conference, EAI2N 2010, Held as Part of WCC 2010, Brisbane, Australia, September 20-23, 2010. Proceedings , 2010, EAI2N.

[13]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles , 2003 .

[14]  Eric S. K. Yu,et al.  Evaluating Goal Achievement in Enterprise Modeling - An Interactive Procedure and Experiences , 2009, PoEM.

[15]  John D. McGregor,et al.  Proceedings of the 13th International Software Product Line Conference , 2009 .

[16]  Eric S. K. Yu,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of goal-oriented satisfaction analysis techniques , 2013, Requirements Engineering.

[17]  Wolfgang Keller Using Capabilities in Enterprise Architecture Management , 2009 .

[18]  Arne-Jørgen Berre,et al.  Open Business Model Innovation with the NEFFICS platform and VDML , 2013, NGEBIS Short Papers.

[19]  Terry Anthony Byrd,et al.  Measuring the Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure: Exploratory Analysis of a Construct , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Janis Stirna,et al.  Capability Driven Development - An Approach to Support Evolving Organizations , 2012, PoEM.

[21]  Jan Bosch,et al.  From software product lines to software ecosystems , 2009, SPLC.

[22]  Eric Yu,et al.  Conceptual Modeling: Foundations and Applications , 2009 .

[23]  Eric S. K. Yu,et al.  Social Modeling and i* , 2009, Conceptual Modeling: Foundations and Applications.