Aboveground Biomass Estimation in Amazonian Tropical Forests: a Comparison of Aircraft- and GatorEye UAV-borne LiDAR Data in the Chico Mendes Extractive Reserve in Acre, Brazil

Tropical forests are often located in difficult-to-access areas, which make high-quality forest structure information difficult and expensive to obtain by traditional field-based approaches. LiDAR (acronym for Light Detection And Ranging) data have been used throughout the world to produce time-efficient and wall-to-wall structural parameter estimates for monitoring in native and commercial forests. In this study, we compare products and aboveground biomass (AGB) estimations from LiDAR data acquired using an aircraft-borne system in 2015 and data collected by the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based GatorEye Unmanned Flying Laboratory in 2017 for ten forest inventory plots located in the Chico Mendes Extractive Reserve in Acre state, southwestern Brazilian Amazon. The LiDAR products were similar and comparable among the two platforms and sensors. Principal differences between derived products resulted from the GatorEye system flying lower and slower and having increased returns per second than the aircraft, resulting in a much higher point density overall (11.3 ± 1.8 vs. 381.2 ± 58 pts/m2). Differences in ground point density, however, were much smaller among the systems, due to the larger pulse area and increased number of returns per pulse of the aircraft system, with the GatorEye showing an approximately 50% higher ground point density (0.27 ± 0.09 vs. 0.42 ± 0.09). The LiDAR models produced by both sensors presented similar results for digital elevation models and estimated AGB. Our results validate the ability for UAV-borne LiDAR sensors to accurately quantify AGB in dense high-leaf-area tropical forests in the Amazon. We also highlight new possibilities using the dense point clouds of UAV-borne systems for analyses of detailed crown structure and leaf area density distribution of the forest interior.

[1]  G. Monette,et al.  Generalized Collinearity Diagnostics , 1992 .

[2]  R. Dubayah,et al.  Estimation of tropical forest structural characteristics using large-footprint lidar , 2002 .

[3]  Jacqueline M. Vadjunec,et al.  Beyond Forest Cover: Land Use and Biodiversity in Rubber Trail Forests of the Chico Mendes Extractive Reserve , 2009 .

[4]  Thomas Hilker,et al.  Stability of Sample-Based Scanning-LiDAR-Derived Vegetation Metrics for Forest Monitoring , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  P. Beets,et al.  The inventory of carbon stock in New Zealand's post-1989 planted forest for reporting under the Kyoto protocol. , 2011 .

[6]  Yi Lin,et al.  Mini-UAV-Borne LIDAR for Fine-Scale Mapping , 2011, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[7]  G. Asner,et al.  A universal airborne LiDAR approach for tropical forest carbon mapping , 2011, Oecologia.

[8]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Development of a UAV-LiDAR System with Application to Forest Inventory , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[9]  Manuel R. Guariguata,et al.  Evaluating the opportunities and limitations to multiple use of Brazil nuts and timber in Western Amazonia , 2012 .

[10]  M. d'Oliveira,et al.  Estimating forest biomass and identifying low-intensity logging areas using airborne scanning lidar in Antimary State Forest, Acre State, Western Brazilian Amazon , 2012 .

[11]  Maxim Neumann,et al.  Detecting tropical forest biomass dynamics from repeated airborne lidar measurements , 2013 .

[12]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  High-fidelity national carbon mapping for resource management and REDD+ , 2013, Carbon Balance and Management.

[13]  I. Colomina,et al.  Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review , 2014 .

[14]  Lian Pin Koh,et al.  Small Drones for Community-Based Forest Monitoring: An Assessment of Their Feasibility and Potential in Tropical Areas , 2014 .

[15]  Robert J. McGaughey,et al.  Monitoring selective logging in western Amazonia with repeat lidar flights , 2014 .

[16]  K. Moffett,et al.  Remote Sens , 2015 .

[17]  R. McRoberts,et al.  Estimating and mapping forest structural diversity using airborne laser scanning data , 2015 .

[18]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Using lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles to monitor tropical forest recovery , 2015 .

[19]  O. Phillips,et al.  Using repeated small-footprint LiDAR acquisitions to infer spatial and temporal variations of a high-biomass Neotropical forest , 2015 .

[20]  L. Tang,et al.  Drone remote sensing for forestry research and practices , 2015, Journal of Forestry Research.

[21]  Philip M. Fearnside,et al.  LIDAR-based estimation of bole biomass for precision management of an Amazonian forest: Comparisons of ground-based and remotely sensed estimates , 2016 .

[22]  Gregory Asner,et al.  Rapid Assessments of Amazon Forest Structure and Biomass Using Small Unmanned Aerial Systems , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[23]  Tina Cormier,et al.  Mapping selective logging impacts in Borneo with GPS and airborne lidar , 2016 .

[24]  Heiko Balzter,et al.  Impact of data model and point density on aboveground forest biomass estimation from airborne LiDAR , 2017, Carbon Balance and Management.

[25]  Impact of data model and point density on aboveground forest biomass estimation from airborne LiDAR , 2017, Carbon balance and management.

[26]  Lammert Kooistra,et al.  Comparing RIEGL RiCOPTER UAV LiDAR Derived Canopy Height and DBH with Terrestrial LiDAR , 2017, Sensors.

[27]  C. Schmullius,et al.  Comparison of UAV photograph-based and airborne lidar-based point clouds over forest from a forestry application perspective , 2017 .

[28]  Antonio Willian Flores de Melo Alometria de Árvores e Biomassa Florestal na Amazônia Sul-Ocidental , 2017 .

[29]  Gherardo Chirici,et al.  Modeling Mediterranean forest structure using airborne laser scanning data , 2017, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[30]  C. Silva,et al.  Individual tree detection from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) derived canopy height model in an open canopy mixed conifer forest , 2017 .

[31]  M. Keller,et al.  Canopy area of large trees explains aboveground biomass variations across neotropical forest landscapes , 2018, Biogeosciences.

[32]  Kustiyo,et al.  Automated method for measuring the extent of selective logging damage with airborne LiDAR data , 2018 .

[33]  L. Rodriguez,et al.  Comparison of ALS- and UAV(SfM)-derived high-density point clouds for individual tree detection in Eucalyptus plantations , 2018, International Journal of Remote Sensing.

[34]  Cheng Wang,et al.  Utility of multitemporal lidar for forest and carbon monitoring: Tree growth, biomass dynamics, and carbon flux , 2018 .

[35]  Lin Cao,et al.  Estimating forest structural attributes using UAV-LiDAR data in Ginkgo plantations , 2018, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[36]  Carlos Alberto Silva,et al.  Optimizing the Remote Detection of Tropical Rainforest Structure with Airborne Lidar: Leaf Area Profile Sensitivity to Pulse Density and Spatial Sampling , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[37]  Eben N. Broadbent,et al.  Monitoring the structure of forest restoration plantations with a drone-lidar system , 2019, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[38]  Le Wang,et al.  Individual mangrove tree measurement using UAV-based LiDAR data: Possibilities and challenges , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[39]  Benjamin Wilkinson,et al.  Geometric Targets for UAS Lidar , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[40]  Richard S. Kanaski,et al.  Rare pre-Columbian settlement on the Florida Gulf Coast revealed through high-resolution drone LiDAR , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  B. Griscom,et al.  Reduced-impact logging in Borneo to minimize carbon emissions and impacts on sensitive habitats while maintaining timber yields , 2019, Forest Ecology and Management.

[42]  E. O. Figueiredo,et al.  Evaluating tropical forest classification and field sampling stratification from lidar to reduce effort and enable landscape monitoring , 2020, Forest Ecology and Management.

[43]  Jing Liu,et al.  Estimating aboveground biomass of the mangrove forests on northeast Hainan Island in China using an upscaling method from field plots, UAV-LiDAR data and Sentinel-2 imagery , 2020, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[44]  Ali P. Yunus,et al.  Different sampling strategies for predicting landslide susceptibilities are deemed less consequential with deep learning. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[45]  Adrián Cardil,et al.  Measuring Individual Tree Diameter and Height Using GatorEye High-Density UAV-Lidar in an Integrated Crop-Livestock-Forest System , 2020, Remote. Sens..