Performance breakdown in optimal stimulus decoding

OBJECTIVE One of the primary goals of neuroscience is to understand how neurons encode and process information about their environment. The problem is often approached indirectly by examining the degree to which the neuronal response reflects the stimulus feature of interest. APPROACH In this context, the methods of signal estimation and detection theory provide the theoretical limits on the decoding accuracy with which the stimulus can be identified. The Cramér-Rao lower bound on the decoding precision is widely used, since it can be evaluated easily once the mathematical model of the stimulus-response relationship is determined. However, little is known about the behavior of different decoding schemes with respect to the bound if the neuronal population size is limited. MAIN RESULTS We show that under broad conditions the optimal decoding displays a threshold-like shift in performance in dependence on the population size. The onset of the threshold determines a critical range where a small increment in size, signal-to-noise ratio or observation time yields a dramatic gain in the decoding precision. SIGNIFICANCE We demonstrate the existence of such threshold regions in early auditory and olfactory information coding. We discuss the origin of the threshold effect and its impact on the design of effective coding approaches in terms of relevant population size.

[1]  E. L. Lehmann,et al.  Theory of point estimation , 1950 .

[2]  Alan A. Stocker,et al.  Is the Homunculus Aware of Sensory Adaptation? , 2009, Neural Computation.

[3]  Ron Meir,et al.  Error-Based Analysis of Optimal Tuning Functions Explains Phenomena Observed in Sensory Neurons , 2010, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[4]  Peter J. Kootsookos,et al.  Threshold behavior of the maximum likelihood estimator of frequency , 1994, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[5]  Alexander S. Ecker,et al.  Reassessing optimal neural population codes with neurometric functions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  Phenomenological model for two‐tone suppression , 1976 .

[7]  Henry C. Tuckwell,et al.  Coding of odor intensity in a steady-state deterministic model of an olfactory receptor neuron , 1996, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[8]  J. Rospars,et al.  Patterns of spontaneous activity in single rat olfactory receptor neurons are different in normally breathing and tracheotomized animals. , 2005, Journal of neurobiology.

[9]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Stochastic resonance enhances the electrosensory information available to paddlefish for prey capture. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[10]  Kelvin E. Jones,et al.  Neuronal variability: noise or part of the signal? , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  Bruno A Olshausen,et al.  Sparse coding of sensory inputs , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[12]  L. Seidman Performance limitations and error calculations for parameter estimation , 1970 .

[13]  A. Pouget,et al.  Reading population codes: a neural implementation of ideal observers , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  B L McNaughton,et al.  Interpreting neuronal population activity by reconstruction: unified framework with application to hippocampal place cells. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  J. Murlis Odor Plumes and the Signal They Provide , 1997 .

[16]  Robert Boorstyn,et al.  Single tone parameter estimation from discrete-time observations , 1974, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[17]  M C Teich,et al.  Auditory-nerve action potentials form a nonrenewal point process over short as well as long time scales. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  R. Zemel,et al.  Inference and computation with population codes. , 2003, Annual review of neuroscience.

[19]  Xiaohui Xie Threshold behaviour of the maximum likelihood method in population decoding , 2002, Network.

[20]  Eric Chaumette,et al.  A New Barankin Bound Approximation for the Prediction of the Threshold Region Performance of Maximum Likelihood Estimators , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[21]  M. Paradiso,et al.  A theory for the use of visual orientation information which exploits the columnar structure of striate cortex , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[22]  Haim Sompolinsky,et al.  Erratum: Population coding in neuronal systems with correlated noise [Phys. Rev. E 64, 051904 (2001)] , 2002 .

[23]  David McAlpine,et al.  Optimal neural population coding of an auditory spatial cue , 2004, Nature.

[24]  André Longtin,et al.  The effects of spontaneous activity, background noise, and the stimulus ensemble on information transfer in neurons , 2003, Network.

[25]  Lawrence P. Seidman,et al.  A useful form of the Barankin lower bound and its application to PPM threshold analysis , 1969, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[26]  Michael N. Shadlen,et al.  Noise, neural codes and cortical organization , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[27]  Rahul Sarpeshkar,et al.  Analog Versus Digital: Extrapolating from Electronics to Neurobiology , 1998, Neural Computation.

[28]  Kip A Ludwig,et al.  Use of a Bayesian maximum-likelihood classifier to generate training data for brain–machine interfaces , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[29]  E. Barankin Locally Best Unbiased Estimates , 1949 .

[30]  H. Sompolinsky,et al.  Population coding in neuronal systems with correlated noise. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[31]  Daryl R. Kipke,et al.  Use of a Bayesian maximum-likelihood classifier to generate training data for brain-machine interfaces (Journal of Neural Engineering (2011) 8) , 2011 .

[32]  Kristine L. Bell,et al.  Threshold Region Performance of Maximum Likelihood Direction of Arrival Estimators , 2007 .

[33]  T. Hromádka,et al.  Sparse Representation of Sounds in the Unanesthetized Auditory Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.

[34]  H Sompolinsky,et al.  Simple models for reading neuronal population codes. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  W. Newsome,et al.  The Variable Discharge of Cortical Neurons: Implications for Connectivity, Computation, and Information Coding , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Principles of Neural Science, ed 3. Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM. Elsevier, New York, 1991, cloth, 1135 pp, illus, $69. , 1993 .

[37]  Petr Lánský,et al.  Efficient Olfactory Coding in the Pheromone Receptor Neuron of a Moth , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[38]  P. J. Mason,et al.  Concentration fluctuation measurements in a dispersing plume at a range of up to 1000 m , 1991 .

[39]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Neuronal Tuning: To Sharpen or Broaden? , 1999, Neural Computation.

[40]  Matthias Bethge,et al.  Optimal Short-Term Population Coding: When Fisher Information Fails , 2002, Neural Computation.

[41]  Raimond L Winslow,et al.  Single-tone intensity discrimination based on auditory-nerve rate responses in backgrounds of quiet, noise, and with stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle , 1988, Hearing Research.

[42]  Kelvin So,et al.  Assessing functional connectivity of neural ensembles using directed information , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[43]  Peter Dylan Recurrent sampling models for the Helmholtz machine , 1999 .

[44]  J. Rospars,et al.  Competitive and Noncompetitive Odorant Interactions in the Early Neural Coding of Odorant Mixtures , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  André Longtin,et al.  Stochastic optimal control of single neuron spike trains. , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[46]  Harry L. Van Trees,et al.  Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, Part I , 1968 .

[47]  Jean-Pierre Rospars,et al.  REVIEW ARTICLE: Neuronal coding and spiking randomness , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[48]  Peter Dayan,et al.  The Effect of Correlated Variability on the Accuracy of a Population Code , 1999, Neural Computation.

[49]  C.E. Shannon,et al.  Communication in the Presence of Noise , 1949, Proceedings of the IRE.

[50]  Laurel H. Carney,et al.  The Spontaneous-Rate Histogram of the Auditory Nerve Can Be Explained by Only Two or Three Spontaneous Rates and Long-Range Dependence , 2005, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[51]  A. Pouget,et al.  Tuning curve sharpening for orientation selectivity: coding efficiency and the impact of correlations , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  Christ D. Richmond,et al.  Mean-squared error and threshold SNR prediction of maximum-likelihood signal parameter estimation with estimated colored noise covariances , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[53]  Kristine L. Bell,et al.  Bayesian Bounds for Parameter Estimation and Nonlinear Filtering/Tracking , 2007 .

[54]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  SPIKING NEURON MODELS Single Neurons , Populations , Plasticity , 2002 .

[55]  Henry C. Tuckwell,et al.  Introduction to theoretical neurobiology , 1988 .

[56]  M. Alexander,et al.  Principles of Neural Science , 1981 .

[57]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[58]  H. V. Trees Detection, Estimation, And Modulation Theory , 2001 .

[59]  Alexandre Renaux Weiss–Weinstein Bound for Data-Aided Carrier Estimation , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[60]  Edward Challis,et al.  Fisher and Shannon Information in Finite Neural Populations , 2012, Neural Computation.