Effect of self-interaction on the evolution of cooperation in complex topologies

Self-interaction, as a significant mechanism explaining the evolution of cooperation, has attracted great attention both theoretically and experimentally. In this text, we consider a new self-interaction mechanism in the two typical pairwise models including the prisoner’s dilemma and the snowdrift games, where the cooperative agents will gain extra bonus for their selfless behavior. We find that under the mechanism the collective cooperation is elevated to a very high level especially after adopting the finite population analogue of replicator dynamics for evolution. The robustness of the new mechanism is tested for different complex topologies for the prisoner’s dilemma game. All the presented results demonstrate that the enhancement effects are independent of the structure of the applied spatial networks and the potential evolutionary games, and thus showing a high degree of universality. Our conclusions might shed light on the understanding of the evolution of cooperation in the real world.

[1]  Erol Akçay,et al.  Reproductive Social Behavior: Cooperative Games to Replace Sexual Selection , 2006, Science.

[2]  Zhen Jin,et al.  Cooperation and popularity in spatial games , 2014 .

[3]  Alana Schick,et al.  Reputation-Based Conditional Interaction Supports Cooperation in Well-Mixed Prisoner’s Dilemmas , 2012, PloS one.

[4]  Long Wang,et al.  Interaction stochasticity supports cooperation in spatial Prisoner's dilemma. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  Lin Wang,et al.  Evolutionary games on multilayer networks: a colloquium , 2015, The European Physical Journal B.

[6]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Reward and cooperation in the spatial public goods game , 2010, ArXiv.

[7]  M. Perc,et al.  Towards effective payoffs in the prisoner’s dilemma game on scale-free networks , 2007, 0711.4028.

[8]  A. Sanchez,et al.  Co-evolution of strategies and update rules in the prisoner's dilemma game on complex networks , 2010, 1007.3626.

[9]  S. Kokubo,et al.  Insight into the so-called spatial reciprocity. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  S. Kokubo,et al.  Universal scaling for the dilemma strength in evolutionary games. , 2015, Physics of life reviews.

[11]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  Cutthroat Cooperation: Asymmetrical Adaptation To Changes In Team Reward Structures , 2006 .

[12]  Run-Ran Liu,et al.  Heritability promotes cooperation in spatial public goods games , 2010 .

[13]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Onymity promotes cooperation in social dilemma experiments , 2017, Science Advances.

[14]  M. Perc Coherence resonance in a spatial prisoner's dilemma game , 2006 .

[15]  M. Nowak Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation , 2006, Science.

[16]  Matjaž Perc,et al.  Chaos promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game , 2006 .

[17]  James P. Bagrow,et al.  Natural emergence of clusters and bursts in network evolution , 2012, Physical Review X.

[18]  Dirk Semmann Conditional cooperation can hinder network reciprocity , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary Dynamics of Biological Games , 2004, Science.

[20]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , 1992, Nature.

[21]  M. Nowak,et al.  A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner's Dilemma game , 1993, Nature.

[22]  M A Nowak,et al.  Spatial games and the maintenance of cooperation. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Wenxu Wang,et al.  Memory-based snowdrift game on networks. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  M. Milinski,et al.  Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’ , 2002, Nature.

[25]  Matjaž Perc,et al.  Phase transitions in models of human cooperation , 2016 .

[26]  Juan Wang,et al.  Impact of self interaction on the evolution of cooperation in social spatial dilemmas , 2016 .

[27]  R Boyd,et al.  Why people punish defectors. Weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  Yi Yu,et al.  System crash as dynamics of complex networks , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Lin Wang,et al.  Degree mixing in multilayer networks impedes the evolution of cooperation , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  Elizabeth Pennisi,et al.  How Did Cooperative Behavior Evolve? , 2005, Science.

[31]  M. Tomassini,et al.  Social Dilemmas and Cooperation in Complex Networks , 2006 .

[32]  Chengyi Xia,et al.  Role of update dynamics in the collective cooperation on the spatial snowdrift games: Beyond unconditional imitation and replicator dynamics , 2012 .

[33]  Angel Sánchez,et al.  Evolving learning rules and emergence of cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[34]  Lin Wang,et al.  Noise-induced enhancement of network reciprocity in social dilemmas , 2013, 1303.1959.

[35]  Aya Hagishima,et al.  An analysis of network reciprocity in Prisoner's Dilemma games using Full Factorial Designs of Experiment , 2011, Biosyst..

[36]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Rewarding evolutionary fitness with links between populations promotes cooperation , 2014, Journal of theoretical biology.

[37]  Chen Shen,et al.  Does coevolution setup promote cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game? , 2016, Appl. Math. Comput..

[38]  J. Cuesta,et al.  Emergence and resilience of cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma via a reward mechanism. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[39]  Lei Shi,et al.  Diversity of neighborhoods promotes cooperation in evolutionary social dilemmas , 2017 .

[40]  Zhipeng Zhang,et al.  Impact of Social Reward on the Evolution of the Cooperation Behavior in Complex Networks , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[41]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of social dilemmas in structured heterogeneous populations. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  G. Szabó,et al.  Cooperation enhanced by inhomogeneous activity of teaching for evolutionary Prisoner's Dilemma games , 2006, q-bio/0610001.

[43]  C. Hauert,et al.  Models of cooperation based on the Prisoner's Dilemma and the Snowdrift game , 2005 .

[44]  Hongyan Cheng,et al.  Effects of inter-connections between two communities on cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game , 2010 .

[45]  Jun Tanimoto,et al.  Network reciprocity by coexisting learning and teaching strategies. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[46]  J. Gómez-Gardeñes,et al.  Robustness of cooperation in the evolutionary prisoner's dilemma on complex networks , 2007, q-bio/0703019.

[47]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Defection and extortion as unexpected catalysts of unconditional cooperation in structured populations , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[48]  Chengyi Xia,et al.  Inferring Reputation Promotes the Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Social Dilemma Games , 2012, PloS one.

[49]  Zhongke Gao,et al.  Spatial prisoner's dilemma games with increasing neighborhood size and individual diversity on two interdependent lattices , 2015 .

[50]  Ramón Alonso-Sanz,et al.  Memory versus spatial disorder in the support of cooperation , 2009, Biosyst..

[51]  Zhen Wang,et al.  Heterogeneous Coupling between Interdependent Lattices Promotes the Cooperation in the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game , 2015, PloS one.

[52]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Self-organization towards optimally interdependent networks by means of coevolution , 2014, ArXiv.

[53]  Zhen Wang,et al.  Impact of Social Punishment on Cooperative Behavior in Complex Networks , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[54]  Dawei Zhao,et al.  Statistical physics of vaccination , 2016, ArXiv.

[55]  Valerio Capraro,et al.  A Model of Human Cooperation in Social Dilemmas , 2013, PloS one.

[56]  Zhen Wang,et al.  Evolutionary Dynamics of Collective Behavior Selection and Drift: Flocking, Collapse, and Oscillation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[57]  M. Hu,et al.  The effect of asymmetric payoff mechanism on evolutionary networked prisoner’s dilemma game , 2009 .

[58]  Zi Yu,et al.  An improved fitness evaluation mechanism with noise in prisoner's dilemma game , 2016, Appl. Math. Comput..