A Novel Validation Algorithm Allows for Automated Cell Tracking and the Extraction of Biologically Meaningful Parameters

Automated microscopy is currently the only method to non-invasively and label-free observe complex multi-cellular processes, such as cell migration, cell cycle, and cell differentiation. Extracting biological information from a time-series of micrographs requires each cell to be recognized and followed through sequential microscopic snapshots. Although recent attempts to automatize this process resulted in ever improving cell detection rates, manual identification of identical cells is still the most reliable technique. However, its tedious and subjective nature prevented tracking from becoming a standardized tool for the investigation of cell cultures. Here, we present a novel method to accomplish automated cell tracking with a reliability comparable to manual tracking. Previously, automated cell tracking could not rival the reliability of manual tracking because, in contrast to the human way of solving this task, none of the algorithms had an independent quality control mechanism; they missed validation. Thus, instead of trying to improve the cell detection or tracking rates, we proceeded from the idea to automatically inspect the tracking results and accept only those of high trustworthiness, while rejecting all other results. This validation algorithm works independently of the quality of cell detection and tracking through a systematic search for tracking errors. It is based only on very general assumptions about the spatiotemporal contiguity of cell paths. While traditional tracking often aims to yield genealogic information about single cells, the natural outcome of a validated cell tracking algorithm turns out to be a set of complete, but often unconnected cell paths, i.e. records of cells from mitosis to mitosis. This is a consequence of the fact that the validation algorithm takes complete paths as the unit of rejection/acceptance. The resulting set of complete paths can be used to automatically extract important biological parameters with high reliability and statistical significance. These include the distribution of life/cycle times and cell areas, as well as of the symmetry of cell divisions and motion analyses. The new algorithm thus allows for the quantification and parameterization of cell culture with unprecedented accuracy. To evaluate our validation algorithm, two large reference data sets were manually created. These data sets comprise more than 320,000 unstained adult pancreatic stem cells from rat, including 2592 mitotic events. The reference data sets specify every cell position and shape, and assign each cell to the correct branch of its genealogic tree. We provide these reference data sets for free use by others as a benchmark for the future improvement of automated tracking methods.

[1]  J. Sulston,et al.  Post-embryonic cell lineages of the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1977, Developmental biology.

[2]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[3]  D. Hirsh,et al.  The postembryonic cell lineages of the hermaphrodite and male gonads in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1979, Developmental biology.

[4]  Scott T. Acton,et al.  Active contours for cell tracking , 2002, Proceedings Fifth IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation.

[5]  Hans-Peter Meinzer,et al.  ALES: Cell Lineage Analysis and Mapping of Developmental Events , 2003, Bioinform..

[6]  Jenny Zhu,et al.  Dynamic Monitoring of Cell Adhesion and Spreading on Microelectronic Sensor Arrays , 2005, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[7]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Cell Segmentation, Tracking, and Mitosis Detection Using Temporal Context , 2005, MICCAI.

[8]  O. Debeir,et al.  Mitotic Tree Construction by Computer In Vitro Cell Tracking: a Tool for Proliferation and Motility Features Extraction , 2005, EUROCON 2005 - The International Conference on "Computer as a Tool".

[9]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Online Tracking of Migrating and Proliferating Cells Imaged with Phase-Contrast Microscopy , 2006, 2006 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop (CVPRW'06).

[10]  Douglas B. Kell,et al.  Automatic tracking of biological cells and compartments using particle filters and active contours , 2006 .

[11]  B. Roysam,et al.  Automated Cell Lineage Construction: A Rapid Method to Analyze Clonal Development Established with Murine Neural Progenitor Cells , 2006, Cell cycle.

[12]  Xiaobo Zhou,et al.  Automated segmentation, classification, and tracking of cancer cell nuclei in time-lapse microscopy , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Xiao Xu,et al.  Live cell quality control and utility of real-time cell electronic sensing for assay development. , 2006, Assay and drug development technologies.

[14]  Thilo Wedel,et al.  Adult pancreatic stem/progenitor cells spontaneously differentiate in vitro into multiple cell lineages and form teratoma-like structures. , 2006, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[15]  Jean-Christophe Olivo-Marin,et al.  Biophysical Active Contours for Cell Tracking I: Tension and Bending , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Image Processing.

[16]  T. Gustavsson,et al.  A Comparative Study between Level Set and Watershed Image Segmentation for Tracking Stem Cells in Time-Lapse Microscopy , 2006 .

[17]  T. Kanade,et al.  Cell Population Tracking and Lineage Construction Using Multiple-Model Dynamics Filters and Spatiotemporal Optimization , 2007 .

[18]  M. Loeffler,et al.  Stem Cell Fate Analysis Revisited: Interpretation of Individual Clone Dynamics in the Light of a New Paradigm of Stem Cell Organization , 2007, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.

[19]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  (A)Symmetric Stem Cell Replication and Cancer , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  Fiorenza Ianzini,et al.  The Large‐Scale Digital Cell Analysis System: an open system for nonperturbing live cell imaging , 2007, Journal of microscopy.

[21]  Ahmet Sacan,et al.  CellTrack: an open-source software for cell tracking and motility analysis , 2008, Bioinform..

[22]  Liran Carmel,et al.  Potency and fate specification in CNS stem cell populations in vitro. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[23]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Cell population tracking and lineage construction with spatiotemporal context , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[24]  Chaofeng Wang,et al.  Tracking cells in Life Cell Imaging videos using topological alignments , 2009, Algorithms for Molecular Biology.

[25]  Jens Rittscher,et al.  Spatio-temporal cell segmentation and tracking for automated screening , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[26]  P. Eriksson,et al.  An automatic system for in vitro cell migration studies , 2009, Journal of microscopy.

[27]  Fons J. Verbeek,et al.  Cell Tracking and Data Analysis of in Vitro Tumour Cells from Time-lapse Image Sequences , 2009, VISAPP.

[28]  B. Wollenberg,et al.  Glandular tissue from human pancreas and salivary gland yields similar stem cell populations. , 2009, European journal of cell biology.

[29]  D C Barber,et al.  Automated tracking of migrating cells in phase‐contrast video microscopy sequences using image registration , 2009, Journal of microscopy.

[30]  Elly M. Tanaka,et al.  Cells keep a memory of their tissue origin during axolotl limb regeneration , 2009, Nature.

[31]  Shin-Ichi Nishikawa,et al.  Continuous single-cell imaging of blood generation from haemogenic endothelium , 2009, Nature.

[32]  D Hasenclever,et al.  A novel view on stem cell development: analysing the shape of cellular genealogies , 2009, Cell proliferation.

[33]  Xiaobo Zhou,et al.  A Novel Cell Segmentation Method and Cell Phase Identification Using Markov Model , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[34]  F. Watt,et al.  Epidermal stem cell diversity and quiescence , 2009, EMBO molecular medicine.

[35]  Philipp S. Hoppe,et al.  Hematopoietic Cytokines Can Instruct Lineage Choice , 2009, Science.

[36]  Andrew R. Cohen,et al.  Computational prediction of neural progenitor cell fates , 2010, Nature Methods.

[37]  Xiao Xu,et al.  The xCELLigence system for real-time and label-free monitoring of cell viability. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[38]  Amir Madany Mamlouk,et al.  Adaptive Mitosis Detection in Large in vitro Stem Cell Populations using Timelapse Microscopy , 2011, Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin.