Modeling Task FMRI Data via Supervised Stochastic Coordinate Coding

Task functional MRI fMRI has been widely employed to assess brain activation and networks. Modeling the rich information from the fMRI time series is challenging because of the lack of ground truth and the intrinsic complexity. Model-driven methods such as the general linear model GLM regresses exterior task designs from voxel-wise brain functional activity, which is confined because of ignoring the complexity and diversity of concurrent brain networks. Recently, dictionary learning and sparse coding method has attracted increasing attention in the fMRI analysis field. The major advantage of this methodology is its effectiveness in reconstructing concurrent brain networks automatically and systematically. However, the data-driven strategy is, to some extent, arbitrary due to ignoring the prior knowledge of task design and neuroscience knowledge. In this paper, we proposed a novel supervised stochastic coordinate coding SCC algorithm for fMRI data analysis, in which certain brain networks are learned with supervised information such as temporal patterns of task designs and spatial patterns of network templates, while other networks are learned automatically from the data. Its application on two independent fMRI datasets has shown the effectiveness of our methods.

[1]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Function in the human connectome: Task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior , 2013, NeuroImage.

[2]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[3]  L. Pessoa Beyond brain regions: Network perspective of cognition–emotion interactions , 2012, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[4]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Yann LeCun,et al.  What is the best multi-stage architecture for object recognition? , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[6]  N. Logothetis What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI , 2008, Nature.

[7]  Allen Y. Yang,et al.  Robust Face Recognition via Sparse Representation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[8]  Degang Zhang,et al.  Complex span tasks and hippocampal recruitment during working memory , 2011, NeuroImage.

[9]  Sungho Tak,et al.  A Data-Driven Sparse GLM for fMRI Analysis Using Sparse Dictionary Learning With MDL Criterion , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Jieping Ye,et al.  Holistic Atlases of Functional Networks and Interactions Reveal Reciprocal Organizational Architecture of Cortical Function , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Online Learning for Matrix Factorization and Sparse Coding , 2009, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[12]  J. Duncan The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: mental programs for intelligent behaviour , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[14]  K. Lange,et al.  Coordinate descent algorithms for lasso penalized regression , 2008, 0803.3876.