Electric fields in Scanning Electron Microscopy simulations

The electric field distribution and charging effects in Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) were studied by extending a Monte-Carlo based SEM simulator by a fast and accurate multigrid (MG) based 3D electric field solver. The main focus is on enabling short simulation times with maintaining sufficient accuracy, so that SEM simulation can be used in practical applications. The implementation demonstrates a gain in computation speed, when compared to a Gauss-Seidel based reference solver is roughly factor of 40, with negligible differences in the result (~10−6 𝑉). In addition, the simulations were compared with experimental SEM measurements using also complex 3D sample, showing that i) the modelling of e-fields improves the simulation accuracy, and ii) multigrid method provide a significant benefit in terms of simulation time.

[1]  Sergey Babin,et al.  CHARIOT: Software tool for modeling SEM signal and e-beam lithography , 2008 .

[2]  L. Reimer,et al.  Scanning Electron Microscopy , 1984 .

[3]  D. Joy.  A database on electron‐solid interactions , 2006 .

[4]  Gerald F. Dionne,et al.  Origin of secondary‐electron‐emission yield‐curve parameters , 1975 .

[5]  H. Fitting,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of secondary electron emission from the insulator SiO2 , 2002 .

[6]  Michael T. Postek,et al.  Scanning electron microscope dimensional metrology using a model‐based library , 2005 .

[7]  Hiroki Kawada,et al.  Influence of electron incident angle distribution on CD-SEM linewidth measurements , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[8]  C. G. Frase,et al.  Model-based SEM for dimensional metrology tasks in semiconductor and mask industry , 2009 .

[9]  Mauro Ciappa,et al.  New integrated Monte Carlo code for the simulation of high-resolution scanning electron microscopy images for metrology in microlithography , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[10]  J. S. Villarrubia,et al.  3D Monte Carlo modeling of the SEM: Are there applications to photomask metrology? , 2014, Other Conferences.

[11]  Harald Bosse,et al.  Impact of EUV mask pattern profile shape on CD measured by CD-SEM , 2005, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[12]  Murli M. Gupta,et al.  Comparison of Second- and Fourth-Order Discretizations for Multigrid Poisson Solvers , 1997 .

[13]  Z. Ding,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of CD-SEM images for linewidth and critical dimension metrology. , 2013, Scanning.

[14]  H. Stolz.  Zur Theorie der Sekundrelektronenemission von Metallen Der Transportproze , 1959 .

[15]  E. Sturler,et al.  Large‐scale topology optimization using preconditioned Krylov subspace methods with recycling , 2007 .

[16]  David C. Joy,et al.  Calculations of Mott scattering cross section , 1990 .

[17]  Harald Bosse,et al.  SEM image modeling using the modular Monte Carlo model MCSEM , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[18]  David C. Joy,et al.  A new examination of secondary electron yield data , 2005 .

[19]  J. Ganachaud,et al.  Secondary electron emission of an insulating target induced by a well-focused electron beam – Monte Carlo simulation study , 2004 .

[20]  Yasushi Nishiyama,et al.  CD-Metrology of EUV masks in the presence of charging: measurement and simulation , 2012, Other Conferences.

[21]  Eric de Sturler,et al.  Recycling Krylov subspaces for CFD applications and a new hybrid recycling solver , 2015, J. Comput. Phys..

[22]  William L. Briggs,et al.  A multigrid tutorial , 1987 .

[23]  John J. Quinn,et al.  Range of Excited Electrons in Metals , 1962 .

[24]  Jun Zhang.  Acceleration of five-point red-black Gauss-Seidel in multigrid for Poisson equation , 1996 .

[25]  C. G. Frase,et al.  CD characterization of nanostructures in SEM metrology , 2007 .

[26]  Wolfgang Hackbusch,et al.  Multi-grid methods and applications , 1985, Springer series in computational mathematics.

[27]  David C. Joy,et al.  Monte Carlo Modeling for Electron Microscopy and Microanalysis , 1995 .

[28]  Achi Brandt,et al.  Multigrid solvers on parallel computers , 1981 .