A Class of Latent Markov Models for Capture–Recapture Data Allowing for Time, Heterogeneity, and Behavior Effects

We propose an extension of the latent class model for the analysis of capture-recapture data which allows us to take into account the effect of a capture on the behavior of a subject with respect to future captures. The approach is based on the assumption that the variable indexing the latent class of a subject follows a Markov chain with transition probabilities depending on the previous capture history. Several constraints are allowed on these transition probabilities and on the parameters of the conditional distribution of the capture configuration given the latent process. We also allow for the presence of discrete explanatory variables, which may affect the parameters of the latent process. To estimate the resulting models, we rely on the conditional maximum likelihood approach and for this aim we outline an EM algorithm. We also give some simple rules for point and interval estimation of the population size. The approach is illustrated by applying it to two data sets concerning small mammal populations.

[1]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Multivariate Logistic Models , 1995 .

[2]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  The Use of a Robust Capture-Recapture Design in Small Mammal Population Studies: A Field Example with Microtus pennsylvanicus , 1984 .

[3]  J. Norris,et al.  NONPARAMETRIC MLE UNDER TWO CLOSED CAPTURE-RECAPTURE MODELS WITH HETEROGENEITY , 1996 .

[4]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  A capture-recapture model with heterogeneity and behavioural response , 1995, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[5]  R. McHugh.  Efficient estimation and local identification in latent class analysis , 1956 .

[6]  F. Bartolucci.  Likelihood inference for a class of latent Markov models under linear hypotheses on the transition probabilities , 2006 .

[7]  Hsin-Chou Yang,et al.  Modeling Animals' Behavioral Response by Markov Chain Models for Capture–Recapture Experiments , 2005, Biometrics.

[8]  A. Shapiro.  Towards a unified theory of inequality constrained testing in multivariate analysis , 1988 .

[9]  Cormack Rm,et al.  Interval estimation for mark-recapture studies of closed populations. , 1992 .

[10]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations , 1980 .

[11]  Lalitha Sanathanan,et al.  ESTIMATING THE SIZE OF A MULTINOMIAL POPULATION , 1972 .

[12]  B. Lindsay,et al.  Semiparametric Estimation in the Rasch Model and Related Exponential Response Models, Including a Simple Latent Class Model for Item Analysis , 1991 .

[13]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[14]  S E Fienberg,et al.  A three-sample multiple-recapture approach to census population estimation with heterogeneous catchability. , 1993, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[15]  L. A. Goodman.  Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models , 1974 .

[16]  F Bartolucci,et al.  Analysis of Capture‐Recapture Data with a Rasch‐Type Model Allowing for Conditional Dependence and Multidimensionality , 2001, Biometrics.

[17]  Shirley Pledger,et al.  The Performance of Mixture Models in Heterogeneous Closed Population Capture–Recapture , 2005, Biometrics.

[18]  J. Vermunt,et al.  Discrete-Time Discrete-State Latent Markov Models with Time-Constant and Time-Varying Covariates , 1999 .

[19]  W. Bogdanowicz,et al.  J. E. Hill, J. D. Smith, 1984: Bats: a natural history. British Museum (Natural History), London, 243 pp , 1984 .

[20]  A. Agresti,et al.  The Use of Mixed Logit Models to Reflect Heterogeneity in Capture‐Recapture Studies , 1999, Biometrics.

[21]  J. Alho.  Logistic regression in capture-recapture models. , 1990, Biometrics.

[22]  Francesco Bartolucci,et al.  A Class of Latent Marginal Models for Capture–Recapture Data With Continuous Covariates , 2006 .

[23]  S. Pledger.  Unified Maximum Likelihood Estimates for Closed Capture–Recapture Models Using Mixtures , 2000, Biometrics.

[24]  Kenneth P. Burnham,et al.  Information-theoretic model selection and model averaging for closed-population capture-recapture studies , 1998 .

[25]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Finite Mixture Models , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[26]  S. Davis,et al.  Capture probability and heterogeneity of trap response in stoats (Mustela erminea) , 2003 .

[27]  Peter G M van der Heijden,et al.  A Multiple‐Record Systems Estimation Method that Takes Observed and Unobserved Heterogeneity into Account , 2004, Biometrics.

[28]  A. Agresti.  Simple capture-recapture models permitting unequal catchability and variable sampling effort. , 1994, Biometrics.

[29]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[30]  Lain L. MacDonald,et al.  Hidden Markov and Other Models for Discrete- valued Time Series , 1997 .