Understanding Technology and People Issues in Hospital Information System (HIS) Adoption: Case study of a tertiary hospital in Malaysia.

BACKGROUND Hospital Information Systems (HIS) can improve healthcare outcome quality, increase efficiency, and reduce errors. The government of Malaysia implemented HIS across the country to maximize the use of technology to improve healthcare delivery, however, little is known about the benefits and challenges of HIS adoption in each institution. This paper looks at the technology and people issues in adopting such systems. METHODS The study used a case study approach, using an in-depth interview with multidisciplinary medical team members who were using the system on a daily basis. A thematic analysis using Atlas.ti was employed to understand the complex relations among themes and sub-themes to discover the patterns in the data. . RESULTS Users found the new system increased the efficiency of workflows and saved time. They reported less redundancy of work and improved communication among medical team members. Data retrieval and storage were also mentioned as positive results of the new HIS system. Healthcare workers showed positive attitudes during training and throughout the learning process. CONCLUSIONS From a technological perspective, it was found that medical workers using HIS has better access and data management compared to the previously used manual system. The human issues analysis reveals positive attitudes toward using HIS among the users especially from the physicians' side.

[1]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitudes and the Attitude-Behavior Relation: Reasoned and Automatic Processes , 2000 .

[2]  Simon Hagens,et al.  Measuring interoperable EHR adoption and maturity: a Canadian example , 2016, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[3]  Edward T. Chen Examining the Influence of Information Technology on Modern Health Care , 2020, Data Analytics in Medicine.

[4]  R. Muñoz Using Evidence-Based Internet Interventions to Reduce Health Disparities Worldwide , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[5]  Francisco Enrique Vicente Castro,et al.  Bottom Up Approach and Devolved Design of a Health Information System: eHealth TABLET , 2013, Brain and Health Informatics.

[6]  J. Creswell Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[7]  Stuart M. Speedie,et al.  The value of structured data elements from electronic health records for identifying subjects for primary care clinical trials , 2015, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[8]  L. Donelle,et al.  Health tweets: an exploration of health promotion on twitter. , 2012, Online journal of issues in nursing.

[9]  David Mechanic,et al.  Physician discontent: challenges and opportunities. , 2003, JAMA.

[10]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Nilmini Wickramasinghe,et al.  Health Informatics: A UK and Canadian Perspective on Current and Future Challenges , 2008, AMCIS.

[12]  Claus Bossen,et al.  Factors affecting physicians' use of a dedicated overview interface in an electronic health record: The importance of standard information and standard documentation , 2016, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[13]  C Lovis,et al.  Attitude of Physicians Towards Automatic Alerting in Computerized Physician Order Entry Systems , 2012, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[14]  Norhayati Zakaria,et al.  Managing ICT in Healthcare Organization: Culture, Challenges, and Issues of Technology Adoption and Implementation , 2010 .

[15]  A. Al-Asmari,et al.  Children’s Glycemic Control: Mother’s Knowledge and Socioeconomic Status , 2013, Global journal of health science.

[16]  E. Hing,et al.  Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2013. , 2014, NCHS data brief.

[17]  Robert El-Kareh,et al.  Use of health information technology to reduce diagnostic errors , 2013, BMJ quality & safety.