Is a Virtual Reality-based Laboratory Experience a Viable Alternative to the Real Thing?

Laboratory practice is an important tool in the education of engineering students. The practical aspect of a laboratory-based education provides a tactile experience for students that allows students an opportunity to understand concepts and also prepare them for the engineering job market. One of the challenges faced by many institutions is that laboratory equipment and machines are costly and, as a result, a viable alternative option should be sought. This necessitates the adoption of virtual reality-based laboratory experiments that provide a laboratory-based instructional experience, similar to that of a real laboratory, yet utilizes a three-dimensional virtual simulation. This provides students with an opportunity to carry out experiments virtually and achieve instant results. In this study, a practical laboratory experience is provided through the use of a virtual reality simulation that is based on a real laboratory. Students are familiarized with the equipment through the provision of the real-world electronic bench equipment and simple electronic components resembling the real laboratory environment. The effectiveness of the virtual reality laboratory is studied using three sets of engineering students. The sets of students include those who have engaged in an actual laboratory experience, those who have experienced only the virtual reality-based laboratory environment, and a third group who has experienced both the real and the virtual reality laboratories. Using a common quiz, each set of students is assessed in their ability to identify and describe the uses of various laboratory equipment. Through the assessment, the viability of the virtual reality-based laboratory is studied regarding the effectiveness of it as an education tool. Recommendations are also made for institutions interested in designing similar experiences.

[1]  Zahira Merchant,et al.  Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students' learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Presence in Virtual Reality and Everyday Life: Immersion within a World of Representation , 2016, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[3]  Xianglei Chen STEM Attrition: College Students' Paths into and out of STEM Fields. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2014-001. , 2013 .

[4]  Harvard Scott Hinton,et al.  Virtual circuit laboratory , 2000, 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135).

[5]  Lawrence E. Carlson,et al.  Staying In Engineering: Effects Of A Hands On, Team Based, First Year Projects Course On Student Retention , 2003 .

[6]  Weiwei Zhu,et al.  On the Exploration of Game-Based Learning in STEM Education with the Development and Application of Virtual Reality Course Modules , 2017 .

[7]  Albert J. Rosa,et al.  The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education , 2005 .

[8]  Jan T. van der Veen,et al.  The learning effects of computer simulations in science education , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Richard T. White,et al.  The link between the laboratory and learning , 1996 .

[10]  Charles J. Lemckert,et al.  Real-time Internet mediated laboratory experiments for distance education students , 2002, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[11]  John R. Bourne,et al.  The Effectiveness of Learning Simulations for Electronic Laboratories , 2002 .

[12]  Michael Zyda,et al.  From visual simulation to virtual reality to games , 2005, Computer.