Successfully Recovered Grassland: A Promising Example from Romanian Old‐Fields

In this study, I analyzed the natural recovery of grasslands on abandoned agricultural fields in the Transylvanian Lowland (Campia Transilvaniei), Romania. I examined fields that were abandoned 1-40 years ago and considered how successful they have been in recovering spontane- ously as compared to reference grassland, especially in relation to species composition and dominance structure. Diverse, nondegraded seminatural grasslands from the surroundings were chosen as targets for the recovery. Five such grasslands were analyzed in order to have multiple references that accounted for site heterogeneity and dif- ferent land use history. This study found that the number of natural and seminatural habitat species increased, whereas the number of weeds and aliens decreased with age. Old-fields had become very similar in species compo- sition and dominance structure to reference grasslands over a 14- to 20-year time interval, with the only failure being the unsuccessful or slow colonization of a few grass- land species. Because spontaneous succession is efficient, human interventions are not needed to restore target com- munities on the old-fields. Propagule pressure expressed by the area of potential seed source in a 500-m-radius buffer was found to have a strong influence on recovery success of old-fields. The success of grassland species in colonizing postagricultural fields was not affected by their dispersal mode but by their frequency in the landscape, this being another evidence for the importance of propa- gule availability in the course of recovery. In order to maintain the potential for recovery of this landscape, we need to protect those close to natural habitats that contain a high amount of native flora.

[1]  Marcel Rejmánek,et al.  Invasibility of plant communities , 1989 .

[2]  R. Moral,et al.  Mechanisms of Early Primary Succession in Subalpine Habitats on Mount St. Helens , 1987 .

[3]  A. Stampfli,et al.  Plant species decline due to abandonment of meadows cannot easily be reversed by mowing. A case study from the southern Alps , 1999 .

[4]  James Aronson,et al.  On the Need to Select an Ecosystem of Reference, However Imperfect: A Reply to Pickett and Parker , 1995 .

[5]  H. Jacquemyn,et al.  The species pool concept applied to forests in a fragmented landscape: dispersal limitation versus habitat limitation , 2002 .

[6]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  On the rate of succession , 1993 .

[7]  Joy B. Zedler,et al.  Tracking Wetland Restoration: Do Mitigation Sites Follow Desired Trajectories? , 1999 .

[8]  S. K. Allison.  When Is a Restoration Successful? Results from a 45-Year-Old Tallgrass Prairie Restoration , 2002, Ecological Restoration.

[9]  A. Otte,et al.  The impact of site conditions and seed dispersal on restoration success in alluvial meadows , 2003 .

[10]  A. Kirmer,et al.  Spontaneous and initiated succession on unvegetated slopes in the abandoned lignite‐mining area of Goitsche, Germany , 2001 .

[11]  The influence of seed addition and cutting regime on the success of grassland restoration on former arable land , 2004 .

[12]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  The role of spontaneous vegetation succession in ecosystem restoration: A perspective , 2001 .

[13]  Mary L. Cadenasso,et al.  Plant colonization windows in a mesic old field succession , 2003 .

[14]  H. Caswell,et al.  Plant dispersal and colonization processes at local and landscape scales. , 2002 .

[15]  Ingo Valgma,et al.  An Analysis of Vegetation Restoration on Opencast Oil Shale Mines in Estonia , 2004 .

[16]  A. Terpó.  Provisional list of Hungarian archaeophytes , 1999 .

[17]  V. Vandvik,et al.  Long‐Term Effects of Reclamation Treatments on Plant Succession in Iceland , 2004 .

[18]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  Charles S. Elton and the dissociation of invasion ecology from the rest of ecology , 2001 .

[19]  H. Jacquemyn,et al.  Impacts of Restored Patch Density and Distance from Natural Forests on Colonization Success , 2003 .

[20]  Cornelia Lehmann,et al.  Restoration of a Landfill Site in Berlin, Germany by Spontaneous and Directed Succession , 2002 .

[21]  M. Hutchings,et al.  Studies on the feasibility of re-creating chalk grassland vegetation on ex-arable land. I. The potential roles of the seed bank and the seed rain , 1996 .

[22]  P. Pyšek,et al.  Spontaneous vegetation succession in human-disturbed habitats: A pattern across seres , 2001 .

[23]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic (3rd edition) , 2022, Preslia.

[24]  B. Fernández-Santos,et al.  Effects of substrate coarseness and exposure on plant succession in uranium-mining wastes , 2001, Plant Ecology.

[25]  J. Mitchley,et al.  The influence of seed addition and cutting regime on the success of grassland restoration on former arable land , 2004 .

[26]  M. Hutchings,et al.  Studies of the feasibility of re-creating chalk grassland vegetation on ex-arable land. II. Germination and early survivorship of seedlings under different management regimes , 1996 .

[27]  D. A. Keith,et al.  Measuring Success: Evaluating the Restoration of a Grassy Eucalypt Woodland on the Cumberland Plain, Sydney, Australia , 2003 .

[28]  P. Poschlod,et al.  Plant species richness in calcareous grasslands as affected by dispersability in space and time , 1998 .

[29]  Peter Poschlod,et al.  BIOPOP — A database of plant traits and internet application for nature conservation , 2003, Folia Geobotanica.

[30]  M. Vellend.  HABITAT LOSS INHIBITS RECOVERY OF PLANT DIVERSITY AS FORESTS REGROW , 2003 .

[31]  C. Grashof-Bokdam,et al.  Forest species in an agricultural landscape in The Netherlands: effects of habitat fragmentation , 1997 .

[32]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  Using spontaneous succession for restoration of human-disturbed habitats: Experience from Central Europe , 2001 .

[33]  R. A. Klips.  Using Newly Developed Analytical Tools to Compare a Restored Prairie with a Remnant in Ohio , 2004, Ecological Restoration.

[34]  S. Pickett,et al.  Effects of plant invasions on the species richness of abandoned agricultural land , 2001 .

[35]  C. J. West,et al.  Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions , 2000 .

[36]  Chang-Seok Lee,et al.  Secondary Succession and Natural Habitat Restoration in Abandoned Rice Fields of Central Korea , 2002 .

[37]  Andrew P. Dobson,et al.  Hopes for the Future: Restoration Ecology and Conservation Biology , 1997 .

[38]  Zoltán Botta-Dukát,et al.  Improved space-for-time substitution for hypothesis generation: Secondary grasslands with documented site history in SE-Hungary , 1998 .

[39]  William Sluis.  Patterns of Species Richness and Composition in Re‐Created Grassland , 2002 .

[40]  Mundy,et al.  Hopes for the Future: Restoration Ecology and Conservation Biology , 1997 .

[41]  Andre F. Clewell,et al.  What Practitioners Need from Restoration Ecologists , 1997 .

[42]  H. Olff,et al.  Why do we need permanent plots in the study of long-term vegetation dynamics? , 1996 .

[43]  M. Palmer,et al.  Ecological Theory and Community Restoration Ecology , 1997 .

[44]  Mary L. Cadenasso,et al.  Exotic plant invasions over 40 years of old field successions: community patterns and associations , 2002 .