Representing the Family: how does the State "Think Family"?

Over the last decade the family and family-centred policies and practices have received increasing attention within the public service agenda, culminating in the emphatic instruction to 'think family' individually, collectively and institutionally. This has occurred at a time when the sociology of the family has increasingly emphasised the difficulties of thinking family in a coherent way. In this article we explore this agenda through an examination of the representational tools with which public service professionals and managers have been recently equipped. We conclude by questioning the adequacy of these tools for effectively representing family relations.

[1]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[2]  T. White,et al.  Adaptation and adjustment in children of transsexual parents , 2007, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

[3]  A. Young Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. , 2001 .

[4]  Luis Guijarro,et al.  Interoperability frameworks and enterprise architectures in e-government initiatives in Europe and the United States , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[5]  E. Munro The Munro review of child protection: final report, a child-centred system , 2011 .

[6]  T Freeman,et al.  Gamete donation: parents' experiences of searching for their child's donor siblings and donor. , 2008, Human reproduction.

[7]  Susan Halford,et al.  Changing the Record: The Inter-Professional, Subjective and Embodied Effects of Electronic Patient Records , 2010 .

[8]  Katie Prince Boring Records?: Communication, Speech and Writing in Social Work , 1996 .

[9]  S. White,et al.  When policy o’erleaps itself: The ‘tragic tale’ of the Integrated Children’s System , 2010 .

[10]  J. Finch,et al.  Negotiating Family Responsibilities , 1992 .

[11]  S. Milner 'Choice' and 'flexibility' in reconciling work and family:Towards a convergence in policy discourse on work and family in France and the UK? , 2010 .

[12]  Shoshana Pollack,et al.  Developing Shared Knowledge: Family Group Conferencing as a Means of Negotiating Power in the Child Welfare System , 2009 .

[13]  C. Smart Personal Life: New Directions in Sociological Thinking , 2007 .

[14]  Marc Berg,et al.  Practices of reading and writing: the constitutive role of the patient record in medical work , 1996 .

[15]  Victoria Climbié,et al.  The Victoria Climbié Inquiry , 2002 .

[16]  C. Hall,et al.  Child-Centric Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and the Fragmentation of Child Welfare Practice in England , 2010, Journal of Social Policy.

[17]  C. White Family intervention projects : an evaluation of their design, set-up and early outcomes , 2008 .

[18]  Marc Berg,et al.  Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[19]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Developing Information Infrastructure: The Tension Between Standardization and Flexibility , 1996 .

[20]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[21]  Val Gillies Meeting parents’ needs? Discourses of ‘support’ and ‘inclusion’ in family policy , 2005 .

[22]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[23]  R. Edwards,et al.  Farewell to family? Notes on an argument for retaining the concept , 2012 .

[24]  D. Cheal Family and the state of theory , 1992 .

[25]  E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[26]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  On the Family as a Realized Category , 1996 .

[27]  D. Chambers Representing the family , 2001 .

[28]  Margaret Bell,et al.  An exemplary scheme? An evaluation of the integrated children's system , 2009 .

[29]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  Representation, Cognition and Self: What Hope for an Integration of Psychology and Sociology? , 1989 .

[30]  Sarah Cotterill,et al.  Transformational Government? The role of information technology in delivering citizen-centric local public services , 2007 .

[31]  H. Laming,et al.  The protection of children in England : a progress report , 2009 .

[32]  C. Smart Textures of Family Life: Further Thoughts on Change and Commitment , 2005, Journal of Social Policy.

[33]  J. Mcmullin,et al.  Sociological Ambivalence and Family Ties: A Critical Perspective , 2002 .

[34]  D. Gittins,et al.  The Family in Question , 1993 .

[35]  James Cornford,et al.  Customer Relationship Management and Citizenship: Technologies and Identities in Public Services , 2008, Social Policy and Society.

[36]  David H. J. Morgan,et al.  Rethinking Family Practices , 2011 .

[37]  J. Scanzoni Families in the 1980s , 1987, Journal of family issues.

[38]  Kate Morris Thinking Family? The Complexities for Family Engagement in Care and Protection , 2012 .

[39]  R. Edwards,et al.  Key Concepts in Family Studies , 2010 .

[40]  J. Lewis,et al.  From Sure Start to Children's Centres: An Analysis of Policy Change in English Early Years Programmes , 2010, Journal of Social Policy.

[41]  K. Pillemer,et al.  Intergenerational Ambivalence : a New Approach to the Study of Parent-Child Relations in Later Life , 1998 .

[42]  Nathan Hughes,et al.  Introduction: Family Minded Policy and Whole Family Practice – Developing a Critical Research Framework , 2010, Social Policy and Society.

[43]  Rob Wilson,et al.  Re-Mixing Digital Economies in the Voluntary Community Sector? Governing Identity Information and Information Sharing in the Mixed Economy of Care for Children and Young People* , 2011, Social Policy and Society.

[44]  Rob Wilson,et al.  ‘You're Just Treating Us as Informants!’ Roles, Responsibilities and Relationships in the Production of Children's Services Directories , 2012 .

[45]  Stephanie Coontz Between Sex and Power: Family in the World, 1900–2000 , 2006 .

[46]  Theo Vurdubakis,et al.  VISIONS OF ORGANIZATION AND ORGANIZATIONS OF VISION: THE REPRESENTATIONAL PRACTICES OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT , 1997 .

[47]  Rob Wilson,et al.  Seeing the Full Picture? Technologically Enabled Multi-Agency Working in Health and Social Care , 2010 .

[48]  J. McCarthy,et al.  The Powerful Relational Language of ‘Family’: Togetherness, Belonging and Personhood , 2012 .

[49]  Jane Lewis Families, individuals and the state , 2007 .

[50]  A. Wilson With friends like these: The liberalization of queer family policy , 2007 .

[51]  D. Smith The Standard North American Family , 1993 .

[52]  U. Beck,et al.  Families in a Runaway World , 2007 .

[53]  Dell Hymes,et al.  Language in Culture and Society: A Reader in Linguistics and Anthropology. , 1966 .