Information Structure and English Article Pedagogy.

Abstract This paper describes several reasons for the difficulty non-native speakers of English have in acquiring the English article system and reviews five pedagogical methods for teaching the article system. The notion of information structure, specifically givenness, is then applied to a sample text to examine the extent to which canonical information structure (i.e. given information first, new information last) is obeyed. Given information was found to adhere to canonical structure most of the time, whereas new information adhered to it only half of the time, though within a narrow range of exceptions. The results of a pilot study in which one group of non-native English speakers is taught the article system using information structure as an overarching framework, another is taught using a traditional explanation of article use, and a third receives no instruction show that the group taught with the information structure framework made small but noticeable improvement compared to the other two groups. The suggested pedagogical application is for language teachers to present canonical information structure as a preliminary guess in determining the appropriate article for any noun, providing a further potential aid in learning the article system.

[1]  Katharine D. Hunt Systems in English Grammar: An Introduction for Language Teachers , 1996 .

[2]  Peter Master,et al.  Teaching the English Articles as a Binary System , 1990 .

[3]  Russell S. Tomlin,et al.  Coherence and Grounding in Discourse: Outcome of a Symposium, Eugene, Oregon, June 1984 , 1987 .

[4]  Jan Svartvik,et al.  A Communicative Grammar of English , 1975 .

[5]  Elliot L. Judd,et al.  Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition , 1983 .

[6]  Juana M. Liceras,et al.  Functional Categories and Acquisition Orders , 1994 .

[7]  Talmy Givón,et al.  Discourse and syntax , 1982 .

[8]  W. Chafe Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing , 1996 .

[9]  John Sinclair,et al.  Corpus, Concordance, Collocation , 1991 .

[10]  Peter Master A cross-linguistic interlanguage analysis of the acquisition of the English article system , 1987 .

[11]  Randal L. Whitman Teaching the Article in English. , 1974 .

[12]  W. Chafe Cognitive constraints on information flow , 1984 .

[13]  Knud Lambrecht,et al.  Information structure and sentence form , 1994 .

[14]  Charles N. Li,et al.  Subject and topic , 1979 .

[15]  Mark Hansen,et al.  Teaching the English Article System. , 1986 .

[16]  Wallace L. Chafe,et al.  The flow of thought and the flow of language , 1977 .

[17]  Peter Master Science, Medicine, and Technology: English Grammar and Technical Writing , 1986 .

[18]  Peter Master,et al.  Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar: The effect of systematic instruction on learning the English article system , 1994 .

[19]  Peter Master,et al.  The English article system: Acquisition, function, and pedagogy , 1997 .

[20]  J. Hawkins Definiteness and indefiniteness: a study in reference and grammaticality prediction , 1978 .

[21]  Jan-Ola Östman,et al.  Handbook of Pragmatics , 2018, Handbook of Pragmatics.

[22]  George Yule,et al.  Explaining English Grammar , 1999 .

[23]  Patricia L. McEldowney A TEACHING GRAMMAR OF THE ENGLISH ARTICLE SYSTEM , 1977 .

[24]  D. Bolinger Meaning and form , 1979 .