Two Kinetic Patterns of Epitope-Specific CD8 T-Cell Responses following Murine Gammaherpesvirus 68 Infection

ABSTRACT Murine gammaherpesvirus 68 (γHV68) provides an important experimental model for understanding mechanisms of immune control of the latent human gammaherpesviruses. Antiviral CD8 T cells play a key role throughout three separate phases of the infection: clearance of lytic virus, control of the latency amplification stage, and prevention of reactivation of latently infected cells. Previous analyses have shown that T-cell responses to two well-characterized epitopes derived from ORF6 and ORF61 progress with distinct kinetics. ORF6487-specific cells predominate early in infection and then decline rapidly, whereas ORF61524-specific cells continue to expand through early latency, due to sustained epitope expression. However, the paucity of identified epitopes to this virus has limited our understanding of the overall complexities of CD8 T-cell immune control throughout infection. Here we screened 1,383 predicted H-2b-restricted peptides and identified 33 responses, of which 21 have not previously been reported. Kinetic analysis revealed a spectrum of T-cell responses based on the rapidity of their decline after the peak acute response that generally corresponded to the expression patterns of the two previously characterized epitopes. The slowly declining responses that were maintained during latency amplification proliferated more rapidly and underwent maturation of functional avidity over time. Furthermore, the kinetics of decline was accelerated following infection with a latency-null mutant virus. Overall, the data show that γHV68 infection elicits a highly heterogeneous CD8 T-cell response that segregates into two distinctive kinetic patterns controlled by differential epitope expression during the lytic and latency amplification stages of infection.

[1]  R. Sun,et al.  Induction of Protective Immunity against Murine Gammaherpesvirus 68 Infection in the Absence of Viral Latency , 2009, Journal of Virology.

[2]  Stephanie S. Cush,et al.  Protective Antigen-Independent CD8 T Cell Memory Is Maintained during γ-Herpesvirus Persistence1 , 2009, The Journal of Immunology.

[3]  E. Wherry,et al.  Impact of Epitope Escape on PD-1 Expression and CD8 T-Cell Exhaustion during Chronic Infection , 2009, Journal of Virology.

[4]  G. Shellam,et al.  Memory inflation during chronic viral infection is maintained by continuous production of short-lived, functional T cells. , 2008, Immunity.

[5]  H. Ploegh,et al.  The CD8 T-Cell Response against Murine Gammaherpesvirus 68 Is Directed toward a Broad Repertoire of Epitopes from both Early and Late Antigens , 2008, Journal of Virology.

[6]  Surojit Sarkar,et al.  Functional and genomic profiling of effector CD8 T cell subsets with distinct memory fates , 2008, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[7]  L. T. Krug,et al.  A gammaherpesvirus-secreted activator of Vβ4+ CD8+ T cells regulates chronic infection and immunopathology , 2008, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[8]  B. Thiers,et al.  Multifunctional TH1 cells define a correlate of vaccine-mediated protection against Leishmania major , 2008 .

[9]  Alan D. Roberts,et al.  Activation phenotype, rather than central– or effector–memory phenotype, predicts the recall efficacy of memory CD8+ T cells , 2007, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[10]  Stephanie S. Cush,et al.  Memory Generation and Maintenance of CD8+ T Cell Function during Viral Persistence1 , 2007, The Journal of Immunology.

[11]  Bjoern Peters,et al.  The CD8+ T-Cell Response to Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus Involves the L Antigen: Uncovering New Tricks for an Old Virus , 2007, Journal of Virology.

[12]  E. Usherwood,et al.  CD80 and CD86 Control Antiviral CD8+ T-Cell Function and Immune Surveillance of Murine Gammaherpesvirus 68 , 2006, Journal of Virology.

[13]  E. Usherwood,et al.  Gammaherpesvirus Persistence Alters Key CD8 T-Cell Memory Characteristics and Enhances Antiviral Protection , 2006, Journal of Virology.

[14]  P. Klenerman,et al.  Four Distinct Patterns of Memory CD8 T Cell Responses to Chronic Murine Cytomegalovirus Infection1 , 2006, The Journal of Immunology.

[15]  Magdalini Moutaftsi,et al.  A consensus epitope prediction approach identifies the breadth of murine TCD8+-cell responses to vaccinia virus , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  S. Rowland-Jones,et al.  Increased Expression of the NK Cell Receptor KLRG1 by Virus-Specific CD8 T Cells during Persistent Antigen Stimulation , 2005, Journal of Virology.

[17]  R. Sun,et al.  Early Establishment of γ-Herpesvirus Latency: Implications for Immune Control1 , 2005, The Journal of Immunology.

[18]  R. Sun,et al.  Early establishment of gamma-herpesvirus latency: implications for immune control. , 2005, Journal of immunology.

[19]  Jessica M Malenfant,et al.  CD107a as a functional marker for the identification of natural killer cell activity. , 2004, Journal of immunological methods.

[20]  In-Jeong Kim,et al.  T Cell Reactivity during Infectious Mononucleosis and Persistent Gammaherpesvirus Infection in Mice1 , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[21]  E. Wherry,et al.  Selective expression of the interleukin 7 receptor identifies effector CD8 T cells that give rise to long-lived memory cells , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[22]  P. Klenerman,et al.  Memory Inflation: Continous Accumulation of Antiviral CD8+ T Cells Over Time , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[23]  R. Sun,et al.  Transcription Program of Murine Gammaherpesvirus 68 , 2003, Journal of Virology.

[24]  E. Wherry,et al.  Viral Persistence Alters CD8 T-Cell Immunodominance and Tissue Distribution and Results in Distinct Stages of Functional Impairment , 2003, Journal of Virology.

[25]  P. Klenerman,et al.  Regulation of the Class II MHC Pathway in Primary Human Monocytes by Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor 1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[26]  D. Voehringer,et al.  Viral Infections Induce Abundant Numbers of Senescent CD8 T Cells1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[27]  B. Walker,et al.  Sustained Dysfunction of Antiviral CD8+ T Lymphocytes after Infection with Hepatitis C Virus , 2001, Journal of Virology.

[28]  J. Stewart,et al.  Natural history of murine gamma-herpesvirus infection. , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[29]  John Sidney,et al.  Measurement of MHC/Peptide Interactions by Gel Filtration , 1999, Current protocols in immunology.

[30]  I. Kim,et al.  Factors controlling levels of CD8+ T-cell lymphocytosis associated with murine gamma-herpesvirus infection. , 2001, Viral immunology.

[31]  J. Lieberman,et al.  Impaired function of circulating HIV-specific CD8(+) T cells in chronic human immunodeficiency virus infection. , 2000, Blood.

[32]  J. Stewart,et al.  Control of Gammaherpesvirus Latency by Latent Antigen-Specific Cd8+ T Cells , 2000, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[33]  P. Lehner,et al.  Inhibition of MHC class I-restricted antigen presentation by gamma 2-herpesviruses. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  J. Sample,et al.  Latent Murine γ-Herpesvirus Infection Is Established in Activated B Cells, Dendritic Cells, and Macrophages1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[35]  J. Sample,et al.  Latent murine gamma-herpesvirus infection is established in activated B cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages. , 2000, Journal of immunology.

[36]  M. Blackman,et al.  T-Cell Vaccination Alters the Course of Murine Herpesvirus 68 Infection and the Establishment of Viral Latency in Mice , 1999, Journal of Virology.

[37]  N. Shastri,et al.  Apparent MHC-independent stimulation of CD8+ T cells in vivo during latent murine gammaherpesvirus infection. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[38]  M. Blackman,et al.  Lytic cycle T cell epitopes are expressed in two distinct phases during MHV-68 infection. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[39]  J. Altman,et al.  Changing patterns of dominance in the CD8+ T cell response during acute and persistent murine γ‐herpesvirus infection , 1999, European journal of immunology.

[40]  J. Altman,et al.  Virus-specific CD8(+) T cell numbers are maintained during gamma-herpesvirus reactivation in CD4-deficient mice. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  E. Usherwood,et al.  Lung Epithelial Cells Are a Major Site of Murine Gammaherpesvirus Persistence , 1998, Journal of Experimental Medicine.

[42]  P. Doherty,et al.  Kinetic Analysis of the Specific Host Response to a Murine Gammaherpesvirus , 1998, Journal of Virology.

[43]  A Sette,et al.  Two complementary methods for predicting peptides binding major histocompatibility complex molecules. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  A. Nash,et al.  Pathogenesis of murine gammaherpesvirus infection in mice deficient in CD4 and CD8 T cells , 1993, Journal of virology.

[45]  Y. Cheng,et al.  Relationship between the inhibition constant (K1) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction. , 1973, Biochemical pharmacology.