Demonstrating stratification in a European American population

Population stratification occurs in case-control association studies when allele frequencies differ between cases and controls because of ancestry. Stratification may lead to false positive associations, although this issue remains controversial. Empirical studies have found little evidence of stratification in European-derived populations, but potentially significant levels of stratification could not be ruled out. We studied a European American panel discordant for height, a heritable trait that varies widely across Europe. Genotyping 178 SNPs and applying standard analytical methods yielded no evidence of stratification. But a SNP in the gene LCT that varies widely in frequency across Europe was strongly associated with height (P < 10−6). This apparent association was largely or completely due to stratification; rematching individuals on the basis of European ancestry greatly reduced the apparent association, and no association was observed in Polish or Scandinavian individuals. The failure of standard methods to detect this stratification indicates that new methods may be required.

[1]  W. Ewens,et al.  Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[2]  L. Cavalli-Sforza,et al.  Genes, peoples, and languages. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  D. Allison,et al.  Estimating African American admixture proportions by use of population-specific alleles. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[4]  J. Pritchard,et al.  Use of unlinked genetic markers to detect population stratification in association studies. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  K. Roeder,et al.  Genomic Control for Association Studies , 1999, Biometrics.

[6]  E S Lander,et al.  The common PPARgamma Pro12Ala polymorphism is associated with decreased risk of type 2 diabetes. , 2000, Nature genetics.

[7]  G. Abecasis,et al.  A general test of association for quantitative traits in nuclear families. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[8]  N. Rothman,et al.  Population stratification in epidemiologic studies of common genetic variants and cancer: quantification of bias. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. , 2000, Genetics.

[10]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Association mapping in structured populations. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[11]  L. Wasserman,et al.  Genomic control, a new approach to genetic-based association studies. , 2001, Theoretical population biology.

[12]  D. Reich,et al.  Detecting association in a case‐control study while correcting for population stratification , 2001, Genetic epidemiology.

[13]  R C Elston,et al.  Transmission/disequilibrium tests for quantitative traits , 2001, Genetic epidemiology.

[14]  S. Gabriel,et al.  The Structure of Haplotype Blocks in the Human Genome , 2002, Science.

[15]  K. Lunetta,et al.  Testing for population subdivision and association in four case-control studies. , 2002, American journal of human genetics.

[16]  Nathaniel Rothman,et al.  Counterpoint: bias from population stratification is not a major threat to the validity of conclusions from epidemiological studies of common polymorphisms and cancer. , 2002, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[17]  Leena Peltonen,et al.  Identification of a variant associated with adult-type hypolactasia , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[18]  John S Witte,et al.  Point: population stratification: a problem for case-control studies of candidate-gene associations? , 2002, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[19]  R. Kittles,et al.  Adjusting for population structure in admixed populations , 2002, Genetic epidemiology.

[20]  Jennifer R. Harris,et al.  Heritability of adult body height: a comparative study of twin cohorts in eight countries. , 2003, Twin research : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies.

[21]  R. Ward,et al.  Informativeness of genetic markers for inference of ancestry. , 2003, American journal of human genetics.

[22]  E. Lander,et al.  Meta-analysis of genetic association studies supports a contribution of common variants to susceptibility to common disease , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[23]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Assessing the impact of population stratification on genetic association studies , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[24]  Scott M. Williams,et al.  A high-density admixture map for disease gene discovery in african americans. , 2004, American journal of human genetics.

[25]  K. Konvička,et al.  Matching strategies for genetic association studies in structured populations. , 2004, American journal of human genetics.

[26]  Pardis C Sabeti,et al.  Genetic signatures of strong recent positive selection at the lactase gene. , 2004, American journal of human genetics.

[27]  P. Donnelly,et al.  The effects of human population structure on large genetic association studies , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[28]  Xiaofeng Zhu,et al.  Genetic Structure, Self-identified Race/ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-control Association Studies , 2022 .

[29]  Birgir Hrafnkelsson,et al.  An Icelandic example of the impact of population structure on association studies , 2005, Nature Genetics.