Testing for the Significance of Violations of Afriat's Inequalities

Two new nonparametric procedures are developed to evaluate the significance of violations of revealed preference found by standard nonstochastic tests. Our tests with high probability correctly detect utility maximization for data generated with measurement error. The procedures are not very sensitive to misspecifying the amount of error that could have caused the data to violate revealed preference. The tests have power against an alternative of random behavior. Both tests fail to reject the null of rational utility maximization from a monetary dataset that has violations of revealed preference.

[1]  Alastair R. Hall,et al.  GARP, SEPARABILITY, AND THE REPRESENTATIVE AGENT , 2000, Macroeconomic Dynamics.

[2]  James L. Swofford,et al.  A Comparison of Nonparametric Tests of Weak Separability for Annual and Quarterly Data on Consumption, Leisure, and Money , 1988 .

[3]  William T. Harbaugh,et al.  Garp for kids: On the development of rational choice behavior , 2001 .

[4]  H. Houthakker Revealed Preference and the Utility Function , 1950 .

[5]  H. Varian The Nonparametric Approach to Demand Analysis , 1982 .

[6]  S. N. Afriat,et al.  On a system of inequalities in demand analysis , 1973 .

[7]  Stephen G Bronars,et al.  The Power of Nonparametric Tests of Preference Maximization [The Nonparametric Approach to Demand Analysis] , 1987 .

[8]  James L. Swofford Microeconomic foundations of an optimal currency area , 2000 .

[9]  James L. Swofford,et al.  Nonparametric Tests of Utility Maximization and Weak Separability for Consumption, Leisure and Money , 1987 .

[10]  Melissa Famulari,et al.  A Household-Based, Nonparametric Test of Demand Theory , 1995 .

[11]  박상용 [경제학] 현시선호이론(Revealed Preference Theory) , 1980 .

[12]  Mary Beth Walker,et al.  The Random Utility Hypothesis and Inference in Demand Systems , 1989 .

[13]  James L. Swofford,et al.  The Changing Empirical Definition of Money: A Comment , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[14]  William A. Barnett,et al.  A Monte Carlo Study of Tests of Blockwise Weak Separability , 1989 .

[15]  H. Varian Non-parametric Tests of Consumer Behaviour , 1983 .

[16]  John Gross Testing Data for Consistency with Revealed Preference , 1995 .

[17]  J. Alston,et al.  Accounting for Changes in Tastes , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[18]  Barry Jones,et al.  Are Money and Consumption Additively Separable in the Euro Area? A Non-Parametric Approach , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[19]  Joe Amoako-Tuffour,et al.  An Examination of Preferences for Local Public Sector Outputs , 1988 .

[20]  S. Afriat THE CONSTRUCTION OF UTILITY FUNCTIONS FROM EXPENDITURE DATA , 1967 .

[21]  Two Simple Algorithms for Generating a Subset of Data Consistent With WARP and Other Binary Relations , 1996 .

[22]  Adrian R. Fleissig,et al.  A New PC-Based Test for Varian's Weak Separability Conditions , 2003 .

[23]  William A. Barnett,et al.  Consumer Theory and the Demand for Money , 2000 .

[24]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Non-parametric analysis of optimizing behavior with measurement error , 1985 .

[25]  J. MacKinnon,et al.  Bootstrap tests: how many bootstraps? , 2000 .

[26]  James L. Swofford,et al.  A revealed preference test for weakly separable utility maximization with incomplete adjustment , 1994 .

[27]  A. Gallant,et al.  SEPARABILITY, AGGREGATION, AND EULER EQUATION ESTIMATION , 2000, Macroeconomic Dynamics.

[28]  Walter Diewert,et al.  Afriat and Revealed Preference Theory , 1973 .

[29]  Richard J McDonald,et al.  An Analysis of Substitution Bias in Measuring Inflation, 1959-85 , 1988 .

[30]  P. Samuelson Consumption Theory in Terms of Revealed Preference , 1948 .