Fuel consumption of rotorcrafts and potentiality for hybrid electric power systems

Abstract The paper proposes a simulation approach to evaluate the power required by a rotorcraft in standard flight missions and in emergency landing maneuvers, and the corresponding fuel consumption, in order to compare the feasibility and potential fuel savings for different hybrid power systems. More in detail, three options are analyzed, namely electrification of the tail rotor, fully hybrid electric propulsion and electric emergency landing. Weight penalty and potential fuel saving for the proposed hybridization schemes are evaluated for an Agusta-Westland A109 twin engine helicopter model. Nonetheless the discussed methods of analysis have general validity for single main rotor helicopter configurations. Two different scenarios are considered in this investigation: current technologies for batteries and motors and improved electrical components, with performance projections as of 2040. According to this analysis, electrification of the tail rotor and parallel hybridization are feasible with available technology, whereas a fully electrical power system for emergency landing could be developed only in the future. Finally, a parallel hybrid electric power system is sized according to the analysis of power request over four different missions. Fuel savings are evaluated for different energy management strategies. According to the results of this investigation, the parallel hybrid electric power system with present-day and future technologies can save fuel up to 5% and 12%, respectively, with an appropriate energy management strategy.

[1]  Giulio Avanzini,et al.  Maximum Range for Battery-Powered Aircraft , 2013 .

[2]  Xiaohua Zeng,et al.  Calibration methodology for energy management system of a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle , 2017 .

[3]  Marc A. Rosen,et al.  Estimation of vertical and horizontal distribution of takeoff and climb NOx emission for commercial aircraft , 2013 .

[4]  Antonio Ficarella,et al.  A new approach to calculating endurance in electric flight and comparing fuel cells and batteries , 2017 .

[5]  Lance W. Traub,et al.  Range and Endurance Estimates for Battery-Powered Aircraft , 2011 .

[6]  Alexander Lukovnikov,et al.  Comprehensive approach to comparative efficiency evaluation of HPS for helicopters , 2014 .

[7]  Barnes W. McCormick,et al.  Aerodynamics, Aeronautics and Flight Mechanics , 1979 .

[8]  Andrew A. Frank,et al.  Conceptual Design and Simulation of a Small Hybrid-Electric Unmanned Aerial Vehicle , 2006 .

[9]  Luigi Spedicato,et al.  Fuel economy of hybrid electric flight , 2017 .

[10]  John Page,et al.  Hybrid powertrain for light aircraft , 2014 .

[11]  Malcolm J. Abzug,et al.  Airplane Stability and Control, Second Edition: Airplane Stability and Control, Second Edition , 2002 .

[12]  K. T. Chau,et al.  Overview of power management in hybrid electric vehicles , 2002 .

[13]  Fabrizio Giulietti,et al.  Maximum endurance for battery-powered rotary-wing aircraft , 2015 .

[14]  Giulio Avanzini,et al.  Optimal performance and sizing of a battery-powered aircraft , 2016 .

[15]  Janko Petrovčič,et al.  Impact of fuel cell and battery size to overall system performance – A diesel fuel-cell APU case study , 2016 .

[16]  Timothy J. E. Miller,et al.  Design of Brushless Permanent-Magnet Motors , 1994 .

[17]  Ajay Babu,et al.  Energy and fuel efficient parallel mild hybrids for urban roads , 2016 .

[18]  Askin T. Isikveren,et al.  Conceptual design of hybrid-electric transport aircraft , 2015 .