Ranking the Risks from Multiple Hazards in a Small Community

Natural hazards, human-induced accidents, and malicious acts have caused great losses and disruptions to society. After September 11, 2001, critical infrastructure protection has become a national focus in the United States and is likely to remain one for the foreseeable future. Damage to the infrastructures and assets could be mitigated through predisaster planning and actions. A systematic methodology was developed to assess and rank the risks from these multiple hazards in a community of 20,000 people. It is an interdisciplinary study that includes probabilistic risk assessment (PRA), decision analysis, and expert judgment. Scenarios are constructed to show how the initiating events evolve into undesirable consequences. A value tree, based on multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT), is used to capture the decisionmaker's preferences about the impacts on the infrastructures and other assets. The risks from random failures are ranked according to their expected performance index (PI), which is the product of frequency, probabilities, and consequences of a scenario. Risks from malicious acts are ranked according to their PI as the frequency of attack is not available. A deliberative process is used to capture the factors that could not be addressed in the analysis and to scrutinize the results. This methodology provides a framework for the development of a risk-informed decision strategy. Although this study uses the Massachusetts Institute of Technology campus as a case study of a real project, it is a general methodology that could be used by other similar communities and municipalities.

[1]  D. M. Karydas,et al.  A method for the efficient prioritization of infrastructure renewal projects , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  E. Triantaphyllou,et al.  A Sensitivity Analysis Approach for Some Deterministic Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods* , 1997 .

[3]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Selecting Attributes to Measure the Achievement of Objectives , 2005, Oper. Res..

[4]  John C. McDonald,et al.  Confronting the risks of terrorism: making the right decisions , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  Rae Zimmerman,et al.  Unraveling Geographic Interdependencies in Electric Power Infrastructure , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[6]  George E Apostolakis,et al.  A Screening Methodology for the Identification and Ranking of Infrastructure Vulnerabilities Due to Terrorism , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[7]  T. Saaty.  Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2000 .

[8]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[9]  Seth D. Guikema,et al.  Probabilistic Modeling of Terrorist Threats: A Systems Analysis Approach to Setting Priorities Among Countermeasures , 2002 .

[10]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[11]  Mark R. McCord,et al.  Lottery Equivalents: Reduction of the Certainty Effect Problem in Utility Assessment , 1986 .

[12]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications , 2004, Technometrics.

[13]  R. Keeney.  Decision analysis: an overview. , 1982, Operations research.

[14]  G. W. Fischer.  Range Sensitivity of Attribute Weights in Multiattribute Value Models , 1995 .

[15]  Mary C. Comerio,et al.  The Economic Benefits of a Disaster Resistant University: Earthquake Loss Estimation for UC Berkeley , 2000 .

[16]  Louis Anthony (Tony) Cox,et al.  Some Limitations of Qualitative Risk Rating Systems , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  David Michaud,et al.  Methodology for Ranking the Elements of Water-Supply Networks , 2006 .

[18]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Terrorism Scenario Identification by Superposition of Infrastructure Networks , 2005 .

[19]  Richard W. Bukowski,et al.  Estimates of the Operational Reliability of Fire Protection Systems , 2002 .

[20]  Rae Zimmerman,et al.  Risk-management and risk-analysis-based decision tools for attacks on electric power. , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[21]  M. Morris.  Understanding Risk - Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1997 .

[22]  Martin Weber,et al.  The Effect of Attribute Ranges on Weights in Multiattribute Utility Measurements , 1993 .

[23]  Warren R. Hughes,et al.  Deriving utilities using the analytic hierarchy process , 1986 .

[24]  Robert T. Clemen,et al.  Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis , 1997 .

[25]  Linda H. Pesante,et al.  Report to the President's Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection , 1997 .

[26]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Eliciting probabilities from experts in complex technical problems , 1991 .

[27]  Mary C. Comerio.  Seismic Protection of Laboratory Contents: The UC Berkeley Science Building Case Study , 2003 .

[28]  George E. Apostolakis,et al.  Deliberation: Integrating Analytical Results into Environmental Decisions Involving Multiple Stakeholders , 1998 .

[29]  B Fischhoff,et al.  A Deliberative Method for Ranking Risks (I): Overview and Test Bed Development , 2001, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[30]  S. Kafandaris.  Decision Sciences: An Integrative Perspective , 1993 .

[31]  Jin Wang,et al.  Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[32]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1996 .

[33]  Bilal M Ayyub,et al.  Critical Asset and Portfolio Risk Analysis: An All‐Hazards Framework , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[34]  James P. Peerenboom,et al.  Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies , 2001 .

[35]  George E. Apostolakis,et al.  Bulk power risk analysis: Ranking infrastructure elements according to their risk significance , 2008 .

[36]  G. Apostolakis.  The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems. , 1990, Science.

[37]  Klaus Pohl,et al.  Modelling Dependencies between Variation Points in Use Case Diagrams , 2003 .

[38]  John A. Forester,et al.  Expert elicitation approach for performing ATHEANA quantification , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[39]  David Michaud,et al.  Screening Vulnerabilities in Water-Supply Networks (PSAM-0250) , 2006 .

[40]  George E. Apostolakis,et al.  A methodology for the prioritization of operating experience in nuclear power plants , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[41]  D. Winterfeldt,et al.  Comparison of weighting judgments in multiattribute utility measurement , 1991 .

[42]  H. Florig,et al.  A Deliberative Method for Ranking Risks (II): Evaluation of Validity and Agreement among Risk Managers , 2001, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.