Resolution limit of label-free far-field microscopy

Abstract. The Abbe diffraction limit, which relates the maximum optical resolution to the numerical aperture of the lenses involved and the optical wavelength, is generally considered a practical limit that cannot be overcome with conventional imaging systems. However, it does not represent a fundamental limit to optical resolution, as demonstrated by several new imaging techniques that prove the possibility of finding the subwavelength information from the far field of an optical image. These include super-resolution fluorescence microscopy, imaging systems that use new data processing algorithms to obtain dramatically improved resolution, and the use of super-oscillating metamaterial lenses. This raises the key question of whether there is in fact a fundamental limit to the optical resolution, as opposed to practical limitations due to noise and imperfections, and if so then what it is. We derive the fundamental limit to the resolution of optical imaging and demonstrate that while a limit to the resolution of a fundamental nature does exist, contrary to the conventional wisdom it is neither exactly equal to nor necessarily close to Abbe’s estimate. Furthermore, our approach to imaging resolution, which combines the tools from the physics of wave phenomena and the methods of information theory, is general and can be extended beyond optical microscopy, e.g., to geophysical and ultrasound imaging.

[1]  J. Elf,et al.  Nanometer resolution imaging and tracking of fluorescent molecules with minimal photon fluxes , 2016, Science.

[2]  Nikolay I Zheludev,et al.  Achromatic super-oscillatory lenses with sub-wavelength focusing , 2017, Light: Science & Applications.

[3]  Michael J Rust,et al.  Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) , 2006, Nature Methods.

[4]  A. Brown,et al.  Optical microscopy for biology : Edited by Brian Herman and Ken Jacobson; Wiley-Liss; New York, 1990; xviii + 658 pages; $95.00 , 1991 .

[5]  Weng Cho Chew,et al.  Study of resolution and super resolution in electromagnetic imaging for half-space problems , 2004 .

[6]  E. H. Linfoot,et al.  On the assessment of optical images , 1955, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[7]  M. Gustafsson Surpassing the lateral resolution limit by a factor of two using structured illumination microscopy , 2000, Journal of microscopy.

[8]  H. Landau The eigenvalue behavior of certain convolution equations , 1965 .

[9]  Anne Sentenac,et al.  Beyond the Rayleigh criterion: grating assisted far-field optical diffraction tomography. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[10]  Max Born,et al.  Principles of optics - electromagnetic theory of propagation, interference and diffraction of light (7. ed.) , 1999 .

[11]  B. Draine,et al.  Discrete-Dipole Approximation For Scattering Calculations , 1994 .

[12]  William P. Wardley,et al.  Interscale mixing microscopy: far-field imaging beyond the diffraction limit , 2016 .

[13]  Weng Cho Chew,et al.  Study of resolution and super resolution in electromagnetic imaging for half-space problems , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[14]  Zhaowei Liu,et al.  Superlenses to overcome the diffraction limit. , 2008, Nature materials.

[15]  Mark R. Dennis,et al.  A super-oscillatory lens optical microscope for subwavelength imaging. , 2012, Nature materials.

[16]  W. Chew Waves and Fields in Inhomogeneous Media , 1990 .

[17]  E. Kosarev Shannon's superresolution limit for signal recovery , 1990 .

[18]  M. Born Principles of Optics : Electromagnetic theory of propagation , 1970 .

[19]  Beiträge zur Theorie des Mikroskops und der mikroskopischen Wahrnehmung , 1873 .

[20]  Olivier J. F. Martin,et al.  Scanning near-field optical microscopy with aperture probes: Fundamentals and applications , 2000 .

[21]  D. Slepian,et al.  Eigenvalues associated with prolate spheroidal wave functions of zero order , 1965 .

[22]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Super-resolution and reconstruction of sparse sub-wavelength images. , 2009, Optics express.

[23]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Sparsity-based super-resolved coherent diffraction imaging of one-dimensional objects , 2015, Nature Communications.

[24]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Sparsity-based single-shot sub-wavelength coherent diffractive imaging , 2011, 2012 IEEE 27th Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel.

[25]  J. Goodman Introduction to Fourier optics , 1969 .

[26]  Evgenii E. Narimanov Hyper-structured illumination (Conference Presentation) , 2016, NanoScience + Engineering.

[27]  M. Gross,et al.  Numerical heterodyne holography with two-dimensional photodetector arrays. , 2000, Optics letters.

[28]  Gisele M. Hodges Optical microscopy for biology , 2004, Cytotechnology.

[29]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[30]  G. D. Francia Resolving Power and Information , 1955 .

[31]  T. D. Harris,et al.  Breaking the Diffraction Barrier: Optical Microscopy on a Nanometric Scale , 1991, Science.

[32]  Nikolay I Zheludev,et al.  Super-resolution without evanescent waves. , 2008, Nano letters.

[33]  Sandeep Inampudi,et al.  Interscale mixing microscopy: numerically stable imaging of wavelength- scale objects with sub-wavelength resolution and far field measurements. , 2015, Optics express.

[34]  D. Donev Prolate Spheroidal Wave Functions , 2017 .

[35]  Neil J. Bershad,et al.  Resolution, Optical-Channel Capacity and Information Theory* , 1969 .

[36]  P. Biagioni,et al.  Near-Field Imaging of Free Carriers in ZnO Nanowires with a Scanning Probe Tip Made of Heavily Doped Germanium , 2017 .