eGovernmentality : on Electronic Administration in Local Government

The overall purpose of this study is to contribute to the discussion of eGovernment implementation by making the implicit organisational micro dynamic processes involved in the framing and implementation of eGovernment explicit. I want to highlight the important process trough which eGovernment is framed and translated by organisational members and in what way it effects different divisions of practice. To do so, two different analytical aspects of organisational life, the rhetoric of management and the reality of work practices are used as a theoretical context for analysing some implications of eGovernment implementation. These analytical dimensions of organisational life are used to discuss a case study looking at the implementation of eGovernment in a local Swedish municipality. The main contribution of this thesis is a theorisation of how to understand the organisational micro dynamic processes involved in the implementation of eGovernment in public administration. New insights could be gained, for researchers and practioners, by analysing the transformation of practice as an ongoing process characterised by micro-political translation processes involving actors as well as actions and meanings in both rhetoric and practice.

[1]  Graham D. Burchell,et al.  The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality , 1991 .

[2]  Roland Almqvist New public management : NPM : om konkurrensutsättning, kontrakt och kontroll , 2006 .

[3]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Information Technology and Administrative Reform: Will the Time After E-Government Be Different? - eScholarship , 2003 .

[4]  R. Wodak Critical Discourse Analysis , 2003 .

[5]  M. Castells The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[6]  Gerald Quirchmayr,et al.  Advances in Electronic Government , 2000 .

[7]  R. Wodak,et al.  Methods of critical discourse analysis , 2001 .

[8]  Nikolas Rose,et al.  Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism, and Rationalities of Government , 1997 .

[9]  M. Gascó New Technologies and Institutional Change in Public Administration , 2003 .

[10]  Michael Meyer 2 Between theory, method, and politics: positioning of the approaches to CDA , 2001 .

[11]  Victor Bekkers,et al.  The Myths of E-Government: Looking Beyond the Assumptions of a New and Better Government , 2007, Inf. Soc..

[12]  Jan-Erik Lane,et al.  New Public Management , 2021, Bangladesh Journal of Public Administration.

[13]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[14]  Vicente Pina,et al.  E-government developments on delivering public services among EU cities , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[15]  V. Dijk,et al.  Multidisciplinary CDA: a plea for diversity , 2001 .

[16]  Marianne Winther Jørgensen,et al.  Diskursanalys som teori och metod , 2000 .

[17]  C. May,et al.  Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: “e-Government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union , 2003 .

[18]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[19]  K. Kraemer INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM: WILL THE TIME AFTER E-GOVERNMENT BE DIFFERENT? , 2003 .

[20]  Anders Grönlund,et al.  Effektivitet och styrning i statliga myndigheter , 2006 .

[21]  Kaifeng Yang,et al.  Neoinstitutionalism and E-Government , 2003 .

[22]  Donald F. Norris,et al.  Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e‐government at the municipal level * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[23]  Mete Yildiz,et al.  E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[24]  J. Fountain Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change , 2001 .

[25]  Lars Ilshammar Det offentliga rummet och demokratins infrastruktur , 2006 .

[26]  Norman Fairclough,et al.  Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities , 1993 .

[27]  Åke Grönlund Electronic government - what’s in a word? : Scope, status and future of the field , 2005 .

[28]  K. Löfgren The Governance of E-government , 2007 .

[29]  Agneta Ranerup,et al.  Rationalities in the Design of Public E-Services , 2007 .