The Effects of Minority/Majority Source Status on Attitude Certainty: A Matching Perspective

Building on recent work exploring metacognitive factors in minority/majority influence, three studies tested the hypothesis that when people receive persuasive messages from sources in the minority or majority, their attitude certainty can be determined by the extent to which source status and perceived argument quality match or mismatch. In Study 1, participants were presented with strong or weak arguments from a minority or majority source. Minority condition participants reported greater attitude certainty when arguments were weak rather than strong. Majority condition participants showed the opposite effect. Study 2 replicated this interaction using a manipulation of perceived rather than actual argument quality. In Study 3, these effects only emerged when message recipients' processing motivation was high. Taken together, the results suggest that attitude certainty can be high or low following minority or majority messages, depending on processing motivation and message recipients' assessments of other persuasive evidence.

[1]  Richard E Petty,et al.  Resistance to Persuasion and Attitude Certainty: The Moderating Role of Elaboration , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[2]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Personal Need for Structure: Individual Differences in the Desire for Simple Structure , 1993 .

[3]  Michael Diehl,et al.  Multiple Source Characteristics and Persuasion: Source Inconsistency as a Determinant of Message Scrutiny , 2002 .

[4]  M. Hewstone,et al.  Majority versus minority influence and prediction of behavioral intentions and behavior , 2007 .

[5]  William D. Crano,et al.  Majority and Minority Influence , 2007 .

[6]  Richard E Petty,et al.  Resisting persuasion by the skin of one's teeth: the hidden success of resisted persuasive messages. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Michael Diehl,et al.  Source Consistency, Distinctiveness, and Consensus: The Three Dimensions of the Kelley ANOVA Model in Persuasion , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[8]  Sabine A. Einwiller,et al.  Accuracy Motivation, Consensus Information, and the Law of Large Numbers: Effects on Attitude Judgment in the Absence of Argumentation , 1998 .

[9]  W. Wood,et al.  Minority influence: a meta-analytic review of social influence processes. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  Majority and minority influence : source-position imbalance as a determinant of message scrutiny , 1994 .

[11]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. , 1979 .

[12]  R. Petty,et al.  Source Attributions and Persuasion: Perceived Honesty as a Determinant of Message Scrutiny , 1995 .

[13]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[14]  R. Dodhia.  A Review of Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (3rd ed.) , 2005 .

[15]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  Attitude Certainty: A Review of Past Findings and Emerging Perspectives , 2007 .

[16]  M. Hewstone,et al.  Resistance to persuasive messages as a function of majority and minority source status , 2003 .

[17]  M. Zanna,et al.  Attitudinal qualities relating to the strength of the attitude-behavior relationship☆ , 1978 .

[18]  Serge Moscovici,et al.  Toward A Theory of Conversion Behavior , 1980 .

[19]  Diane M. Mackie,et al.  Systematic and nonsystematic processing of majority and minority persuasive communications. , 1987 .

[20]  Gabriel Mugny,et al.  The Social Psychology of Minority Influence , 1991 .

[21]  Richard E Petty,et al.  Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: the self-validation hypothesis. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[23]  John A. Edwards,et al.  The interactive effects of processing preference and motivation on information processing: Causal uncertainty and the MBTI in a persuasion context , 2003 .

[24]  W. Crano,et al.  The leniency contract and persistence of majority and minority influence. , 1998 .

[25]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  Unpacking attitude certainty: attitude clarity and attitude correctness. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  L. Tiedens,et al.  Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: the effects of specific emotions on information processing. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  M. Trost,et al.  Minority influence: Personal relevance biases cognitive processes and reverses private acceptance , 1992 .

[28]  Gerd Bohner,et al.  Beyond Conflict and Discrepancy: Cognitive Bias in Minority and Majority Influence , 1998 .

[29]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  Source Credibility and Attitude Certainty: A Metacognitive Analysis of Resistance to Persuasion , 2004 .

[30]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  DISPOSITIONAL DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE MOTIVATION : THE LIFE AND TIMES OF INDIVIDUALS VARYING IN NEED FOR COGNITION , 1996 .

[31]  George Y. Bizer,et al.  Memory-based versus on-line processing : Implications for attitude strength , 2006 .

[32]  Zakary L. Tormala,et al.  The Perceived Informational Basis of Attitudes: Implications for Subjective Ambivalence , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[33]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[34]  R. Petty,et al.  Resisting Persuasion by Illegitimate Means: A Metacognitive Perspective on Minority Influence , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[35]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  When increased confidence yields increased thought : A confidence-matching hypothesis , 2008 .

[36]  C. Dreu,et al.  Differential processing and attitude change following majority versus minority arguments , 1996 .

[37]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Minority Influence on Focal and Related Attitudes: Change in Size, Attributions, and Information Processing , 2002 .

[38]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Preference for Consistency: The Development of a Valid Measure and the Discovery of Surprising Behavioral Implications , 1995 .

[39]  R. Petty,et al.  What doesn't kill me makes me stronger: the effects of resisting persuasion on attitude certainty. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  Jill A. Jacobson,et al.  Causal uncertainty beliefs and diagnostic information seeking. , 1997 .

[41]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[42]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  M. Hewstone,et al.  Majority versus minority influence: When, not whether, source status instigates heuristic or systematic processing , 2003 .

[44]  Serge Moscovici,et al.  Perspectives on minority influence: Innovation and minority influence , 1985 .

[45]  W DreudeC.K.,et al.  Convergent and divergent processing of minority and majority arguments: Effects on focal and related attitudes , 1999 .