Pavement drainage pipe condition assessment by GPR image reconstruction using FDTD modeling

Abstract Drainage pipes, as a common water collection system, need to be monitored to ensure proper functionality. One non-destructive way to assess the condition of drainage pipes is to use ground penetrating radar (GPR). The main objective of this study is to develop algorithms to process and interpret the simulated GPR signal from drainage pipes embedded in concrete pavement. This allows locating drainage pipes and predicting their size and condition. The research focuses on reconstructing target images of drainage pipes embedded in concrete pavement. GPR signals were simulated using finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method. Migration reconstruction and sparse reconstruction methods were used to reconstruct the drainage pipes target. It was found that both methods can predict the condition of the drainage pipe, i.e., whether the pipes are empty or occupied by water or soil. The sparse reconstruction method has better reconstruction accuracy and can be used to locate the drainage pipes and determining pipes diameter. The migration reconstruction method is easier to perform and requires less computational time.

[1]  Imad L. Al-Qadi,et al.  Development and validation for in situ asphalt mixture density prediction models , 2011 .

[2]  J. Leckebusch Comparison of a stepped‐frequency continuous wave and a pulsed GPR system , 2011 .

[3]  Imad L. Al-Qadi,et al.  In situ measurements of hot-mix asphalt dielectric properties , 2001 .

[4]  Norman Bleistein Hagedoorn told us how to do Kirchhoff migration and inversion , 1999 .

[5]  Hyoung-sun Youn,et al.  Neural detection for buried pipe using fully polarimetric GPR , 2004, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Grounds Penetrating Radar, 2004. GPR 2004..

[6]  Samuel H. Gray,et al.  From the Hagedoorn imaging technique to Kirchhoff migration and inversion , 2001 .

[7]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  State of the art in sensor technologies for sewer inspection , 2002 .

[8]  H. S. Lien,et al.  Measurement radius of reinforcing steel bar in concrete using digital image GPR , 2009 .

[9]  Imad L. Al-Qadi,et al.  In-Place Hot-Mix Asphalt Density Estimation Using Ground-Penetrating Radar , 2010 .

[10]  W. Carrara,et al.  Spotlight synthetic aperture radar : signal processing algorithms , 1995 .

[11]  Joe LoVetri,et al.  Derivation and comparison of SAR and frequency-wavenumber migration within a common inverse scalar wave problem formulation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  George A. McMechan,et al.  GPR characterization of buried tanks and pipes , 1997 .

[13]  Francesco Soldovieri,et al.  Sparse Reconstruction From GPR Data With Applications to Rebar Detection , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[14]  Imad L. Al-Qadi,et al.  Application of regularized deconvolution technique for predicting pavement thin layer thicknesses from ground penetrating radar data , 2015 .

[15]  K. Yee Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving maxwell's equations in isotropic media , 1966 .

[16]  Imad L. Al-Qadi,et al.  Algorithm development for the application of ground-penetrating radar on asphalt pavement compaction monitoring , 2016 .

[17]  Shan Zhao,et al.  Development of regularization methods on simulated ground-penetrating radar signals to predict thin asphalt overlay thickness , 2017, Signal Process..

[18]  J. Gazdag,et al.  Migration of seismic data , 1984, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[19]  A. Ahrary,et al.  A New Approach to the Sewer Pipe Inspection: Fully Autonomous Mobile Robot "KANTARO" , 2006, IECON 2006 - 32nd Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics.

[20]  Jianming Jin Theory and Computation of Electromagnetic Fields , 2010 .

[21]  Imad L. Al-Qadi,et al.  Development of an analytic approach utilizing the extended common midpoint method to estimate asphalt pavement thickness with 3-D ground-penetrating radar , 2016 .

[22]  Chi-Chih Chen,et al.  GPR detection of drainage pipes in farmlands , 2004, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Grounds Penetrating Radar, 2004. GPR 2004..

[23]  Michael P. Friedlander,et al.  Probing the Pareto Frontier for Basis Pursuit Solutions , 2008, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[24]  Sunil K. Sinha State-of-the-Art in Sensor Technologies for Pipe Inspection , 2003 .

[25]  Imad L. Al-Qadi,et al.  MEASURING LAYER THICKNESSES WITH GPR - THEORY TO PRACTICE , 2005 .

[26]  Clifford H. Thurber,et al.  Parameter estimation and inverse problems , 2005 .

[27]  Chi-Chih Chen,et al.  DETECTION OF BURIED AGRICULTURAL DRAINAGE PIPE WITH GEOPHYSICAL METHODS , 2004 .

[28]  A. Berkhout,et al.  Seismic inversion in terms of pre-stack migration and multiple elimination , 1986, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[29]  Egil Eide,et al.  3D utility mapping using electronically scanned antenna array , 2002, International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.

[30]  Sunil K. Sinha A Multi-Sensory Approach to Structural Health Monitoring of Buried Sewer Pipelines Infrastructure System , 2004 .

[31]  H. T. Roman,et al.  Pipe crawling inspection robots: an overview , 1992 .