Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye-contact on toxic online disinhibition

The present research studied the impact of three typical online communication factors on inducing the toxic online disinhibition effect: anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye-contact. Using an experimental design with 142 participants, we examined the extent to which these factors lead to flaming behaviors, the typical products of online disinhibition. Random pairs of participants were presented with a dilemma for discussion and a common solution through online chat. The effects were measured using participants' self-reports, expert judges' ratings of chat transcripts, and textual analyses of participants' conversations. A 2x2x2 (anonymity/non-anonymityxvisibility/invisibilityxeye-contact/lack of eye-contact) MANOVA was employed to analyze the findings. The results suggested that of the three independent variables, lack of eye-contact was the chief contributor to the negative effects of online disinhibition. Consequently, it appears that previous studies might have defined the concept of anonymity too broadly by not addressing other online communication factors, especially lack of eye-contact, that impact disinhibition. The findings are explained in the context of an onlinesense of unidentifiability, which apparently requires a more refined view of the components that create a personal sense of anonymity.

[1]  John Suler,et al.  The Bad Boys of Cyberspace: Deviant Behavior in a Multimedia Chat Community , 1998, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[2]  Dmitri Williams,et al.  Internet Fantasy Violence: A Test of Aggression in an Online Game , 2005 .

[3]  Milam W. Aiken,et al.  Flaming among first-time group support system users , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[4]  Ken J. Rotenberg,et al.  The contribution of adults' nonverbal cues and children's shyness to the development of rapport between adults and preschool children , 2003 .

[5]  Kara L. Orvis,et al.  Situation Invisibility and Attribution in Distributed Collaborations , 2007 .

[6]  Andrew J. Flanagin,et al.  Computer-Mediated Group Work: The Interaction of Sex and Anonymity , 2002, Commun. Res..

[7]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[8]  S. Turkle.  WHITHER PSYCHOANALYSIS IN COMPUTER CULTURE , 2004 .

[9]  C. Kleinke.  Gaze and eye contact: a research review. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  D. Giles,et al.  Inside the “Pro-ana” Community: A Covert Online Participant Observation , 2007, Eating disorders.

[11]  G. W. Grumet,et al.  Eye contact: the core of interpersonal relatedness. , 1983, Psychiatry.

[12]  S. Turkle.  Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet , 1997 .

[13]  Gwyneth Doherty-Sneddon,et al.  Face-to-face and video mediated communication: a comparison of dialogue structure and task performance , 1997 .

[14]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  The Unbearable Likeness of Being Digital: The Persistence of Nonverbal Social Norms in Online Virtual Environments , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[15]  Hans-Ullrich Mühlenfeld,et al.  Differences between 'talking about' and 'admitting' sensitive behaviour in anonymous and non-anonymous web-based interviews , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[16]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the "true self" on the Internet. , 2002 .

[17]  P. Zimbardo.  The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. , 1969 .

[18]  J. Silla,et al.  The influence of familiarity among group members, group atmosphere and assertiveness on uninhibited behavior through three different communication media , 2000 .

[19]  René Weber,et al.  The Internet and Aggression: Motivation, Disinhibitory, and Opportunity Aspects , 2013 .

[20]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[21]  A. Joinson.  Self‐disclosure in computer‐mediated communication: The role of self‐awareness and visual anonymity , 2001 .

[22]  Azy Barak,et al.  Internet use and personal empowerment of hearing-impaired adolescents , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Milam W. Aiken,et al.  Flaming in electronic communication , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[24]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[25]  J. Gackenbach.  Psychology and the Internet : intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications , 1998 .

[26]  Chyan Yang,et al.  Predicting the Determinants of Users' Intentions for Using YouTube to Share Video: Moderating Gender Effects , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[27]  Hangwoo Lee.  Behavioral Strategies for Dealing with Flaming in An Online Forum , 2005 .

[28]  K. Douglas,et al.  Identifiability and self-presentation: computer-mediated communication and intergroup interaction. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[29]  John Suler,et al.  Image, Word, Action: Interpersonal Dynamics in a Photo-Sharing Community , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[30]  John Suler,et al.  Fostering empowerment in online support groups , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  A W Siegman,et al.  Speaking without seeing, or the effect of interviewer absence on interviewee disclosure time , 1983, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[32]  Félix Moral-Toranzo,et al.  Anonymity effects in computer-mediated communication in the case of minority influence , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  José van Dijck,et al.  Digital photography: communication, identity, memory , 2008 .

[34]  Rosemarie D. Amendolia,et al.  Contemporary media forum: Books, films, and audiacasettes , 2004, Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy.

[35]  Anna K. Turnage,et al.  Email Flaming Behaviors and Organizational Conflict , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[36]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  An interactional perspective on group awareness: Alleviating the information-exchange dilemma (for everybody?) , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[37]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  The impact of emotionality and self-disclosure on online dating versus traditional dating , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[38]  John Suler,et al.  Psychological Aspects of Cyberspace: Reflections on the Psychology and Social Science of Cyberspace , 2008 .

[39]  S. Jourard,et al.  Experimenter-subject "distance" and self-disclosure. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  A. Joinson.  Understanding the Psychology of Internet Behaviour: Virtual Worlds, Real Lives , 2002 .

[41]  Patricia Webbink,et al.  The power of the eyes , 1986 .

[42]  George R. S. Weir,et al.  People and Computers IX: Crafting Interaction: Styles, Metaphors, Modalities and Agents , 1994 .

[43]  Ria Verleur,et al.  Flaming on YouTube , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[44]  Azy Barak,et al.  Psychological Aspects of Cyberspace: Theory, Research, Applications , 2008 .

[45]  Georgette Dumont,et al.  Virtual Jungles , 2005 .

[46]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  The internet and social life. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[47]  Chien Chou,et al.  An analysis of multiple factors of cyberbullying among junior high school students in Taiwan , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[48]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Virtual group dynamics. , 2002 .

[49]  A. Joinson.  Disinhibition and the Internet , 2007 .

[50]  T. Postmes,et al.  Intergroup differentiation in computer-mediated communication: Effects of depersonalization , 2002 .

[51]  Kimberly M. Christopherson.  The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions: "On the Internet, Nobody Knows You're a Dog" , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[52]  Wen-Bin Chiou.  Adolescents' sexual self-disclosure on the internet: deindividuation and impression management. , 2006, Adolescence.

[53]  Hua Qian,et al.  Anonymity and Self-Disclosure on Weblogs , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[54]  Andrew J. Cowell,et al.  Manipulation of non-verbal interaction style and demographic embodiment to increase anthropomorphic computer character credibility , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[55]  Thomas Chesney,et al.  The impact of anonymity on weblog credibility , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[56]  Daantje Derks,et al.  The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[57]  A. Anderson,et al.  The Effects of Visibility on Dialogue and Performance in a Cooperative Problem Solving Task , 1994 .

[58]  Roger Tourangeau,et al.  Humanizing self-administered surveys: experiments on social presence in web and IVR surveys , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[59]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology , 2007 .

[60]  Rosalind Dyer,et al.  What's the Flaming Problem? or Computer Mediated Communicatio - Deindividuating or Disinhibiting? , 1996, BCS HCI.

[61]  Natilene Bowker,et al.  Disability Discourses for Online Identities , 2002 .

[62]  Andrea Chester,et al.  Impression management and identity online , 2009 .

[63]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  Adolescents’ identity experiments on the internet , 2005 .

[64]  Chao-Min Chiu,et al.  Exploring and mitigating social loafing in online communities , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[65]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Validation and Application of Electronic Propinquity Theory to Computer-Mediated Communication in Groups , 2008, Commun. Res..

[66]  Chiung-Wen Hsu,et al.  Staging on the Internet: Research on Online Photo Album Users in Taiwan with the Spectacle/Performance Paradigm , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[67]  A. Buss,et al.  The aggression questionnaire. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[68]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Two faces of anonymity: Paradoxical effects of cues to identity in CMC , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[69]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  Endowment heterogeneity and identifiability in the information-exchange dilemma , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[70]  J. Suler.  The Online Disinhibition Effect , 2004, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking.

[71]  Jennifer Jie Xu,et al.  Mining communities and their relationships in blogs: A study of online hate groups , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[72]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  Does the Type of Anonymity Matter? The Impact of Visualization on Information Sharing in Online Groups , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[73]  C. Scott.  The impact of physical and discursive anonymity on group members’ multiple identifications during computer‐supported decision making , 1999 .

[74]  M. Ibañez.  RESEÑA de : Joinson, Adam N. Understanding the psychology of internet behaviour virtual worlds, real lives. Gales : Palgrave MacMillan, 2003 , 2003 .

[75]  Phyllis Schumacher,et al.  Loneliness and social uses of the Internet , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[76]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  The self, online. , 2003 .

[77]  A. Barak.  Sexual Harassment on the Internet , 2005 .

[78]  Kenneth J. Gergen,et al.  Deviance In Dark , 1973 .

[79]  H. Hecht,et al.  Are you looking at me? Measuring the cone of gaze. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[80]  D. Giles,et al.  Constructing identities in cyberspace: the case of eating disorders. , 2006, The British journal of social psychology.

[81]  Tom Postmes,et al.  When are net effects gross products? The power of influence and the influence of power in computer-mediated communication. , 2002 .

[82]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Computer-mediated communication and social identity , 2007 .