An ex vivo study of the correlation between acoustic emission and microvascular damage.

The objective of this study was to conduct an ex vivo examination of correlation between acoustic emission and tissue damage. Intravital microscopy was employed in conjunction with ultrasound exposure in cremaster muscle of male Wistar rats. Definity microbubbles were administered intravenously through the tail vein (80microL.kg(-1).min(-1)infusion rate) with the aid of a syringe pump. For the pulse repetition frequency (PRF) study, exposures were performed at four locations of the cremaster at a PRF of 1000, 500, 100 and 10Hz (one location per PRF per rat). The 100-pulse exposures were implemented at a peak rarefactional pressure (P(r)) of 2MPa, frequency of 2.25MHz with 46 cycle pulses. For the pressure amplitude threshold study, 100-pulse exposures (46 cycle pulses) were conducted at various peak rarefactional pressures from 0.5MPa to 2MPa at a frequency of 2.25MHz and PRF of 100Hz. Photomicrographs were captured before and 2-min postexposure. On a pulse-to-pulse basis, the 10Hz acoustic emission was considerably higher and more sustained than those at other PRFs (1000, 500, and 100Hz) (p<0.05). Damage, measured as area of extravasation of red blood cells (RBCs), was also significantly higher at 10Hz PRF than at 1000, 500 and 100Hz (p<0.01). The correlation of acoustic emission to tissue damage showed a trend of increasing damage with increasing cumulative function of the relative integrated power spectrum (CRIPS; R(2)=0.75). No visible damage was present at P(r)< or =0.85MPa. Damage, however, was observed at P(r)> or =1.0MPa and it increased with increasing acoustic pressure.

[1]  A. Hudetz,et al.  Microvascular flow and tissue PO(2) in skeletal muscle of chronic reduced renal mass hypertensive rats. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[2]  Lawrence A Crum,et al.  Inertial cavitation dose and hemolysis produced in vitro with or without Optison. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  R. M. Thomas,et al.  Ultrasound contrast agents nucleate inertial cavitation in vitro. , 1995, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  Jiri Sklenar,et al.  Microvascular rheology of Definity microbubbles after intra-arterial and intravenous administration. , 2002, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[5]  M D Blaufox,et al.  Blood volume in the rat. , 1985, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  An in vivo rat model simulating imaging of human kidney by diagnostic ultrasound with gas-body contrast agent. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  Ji Song,et al.  Influence of injection site, microvascular pressure and ultrasound variables on microbubble-mediated delivery of microspheres to muscle. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  U. Bagge,et al.  Microvascular Behavior and Effects of Sonazoid Microbubbles in the Cremaster Muscle of Rats After Local Administration , 2006, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[9]  R. Apfel,et al.  Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound. , 1991, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[10]  F Forsberg,et al.  Ultrasonic characterization of the nonlinear properties of contrast microbubbles. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  R S Meltzer,et al.  Correlation of ultrasound-induced hemolysis with cavitation detector output in vitro. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[12]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Impact of myocardial contrast echocardiography on vascular permeability: comparison of three different contrast agents. , 2004 .

[13]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  The relationship of acoustic emission and pulse-repetition frequency in the detection of gas body stability and cell death. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Optical monitoring of ultrasound-induced bioeffects in glass catfish. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[15]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Nephron injury induced by diagnostic ultrasound imaging at high mechanical index with gas body contrast agent. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  W. Mcdicken,et al.  Quantification of microbubble destruction of three fluorocarbon-filled ultrasonic contrast agents. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Sonoporation of monolayer cells by diagnostic ultrasound activation of contrast-agent gas bodies. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  Morton W. Miller,et al.  Exposure criteria for medical diagnostic ultrasound: II. Criteria based on all known mechanisms , 2002 .

[19]  S. Baez,et al.  An open cremaster muscle preparation for the study of blood vessels by in vivo microscopy. , 1973, Microvascular research.

[20]  C. Cox,et al.  A comparison of the hemolytic potential of Optison and Albunex in whole human blood in vitro: acoustic pressure, ultrasound frequency, donor and passive cavitation detection considerations. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[21]  J. Fowlkes,et al.  An in vitro study of the correlation between bubble distribution, acoustic emission, and cell damage by contrast ultrasound , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[22]  T C Skalak,et al.  Direct In Vivo Visualization of Intravascular Destruction of Microbubbles by Ultrasound and Its Local Effects on Tissue. , 1998, Circulation.

[23]  Juan Tu,et al.  Inertial cavitation dose produced in ex vivo rabbit ear arteries with Optison by 1-MHz pulsed ultrasound. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[24]  Douglas L. Miller WFUMB Safety Symposium on Echo-Contrast Agents: in vitro bioeffects. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[25]  Flemming Forsberg,et al.  Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Basic Principles and Clinical Applications , 2001 .

[26]  J. Fowlkes,et al.  Relationships between scattered signals from ultrasonically activated contrast agents and cell membrane damage in vitro , 2001, 2001 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37263).

[27]  A. Brayman,et al.  Correlation between inertial cavitation dose and endothelial cell damage in vivo. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[28]  Juan Tu,et al.  Intravascular inertial cavitation activity detection and quantification in vivo with Optison. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.