Parallelism Effects and Verb Activation: The Sustained Reactivation Hypothesis

This study investigated the processes underlying parallelism by evaluating the activation of a parallel element (i.e., a verb) throughout and-coordinated sentences. Four points were tested: (1) approximately 1,600ms after the verb in the first conjunct (PP1), (2) immediately following the conjunction (PP2), (3) approximately 1,100ms after the conjunction (PP3), (4) at the end of the second conjunct (PP4). The results revealed no activation at PP1, suggesting activation related to the initial presentation had decayed by this point; however, activation was observed at PP2, PP3, and PP4, suggesting the conjunction elicits reactivation that is sustained throughout the second conjunct. These findings support a specific hypothesis about parallelism, the sustained reactivation hypothesis. This hypothesis claims that, in conjoined structures, a cue that is associated with parallelism elicits the reactivation of material from the first conjunct and that this activation is sustained until integration with the second conjunct can be completed.

[1]  K. McRae,et al.  Integrating Verbs, Situation Schemas, and Thematic Role Concepts , 2001 .

[2]  J. Trueswell,et al.  How to Prune a Garden Path by Nipping It in the Bud: Fast Priming of Verb Argument Structure , 1998 .

[3]  A. Friederici,et al.  Verb Argument Structure Processing: The Role of Verb-Specific and Argument-Specific Information☆☆☆ , 2000 .

[4]  D Swinney,et al.  The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[5]  G. Altmann,et al.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.

[6]  J Grimshaw,et al.  Verb processing during sentence comprehension: Contextual impenetrability , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[7]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Evidence for the immediate use of verb control information in sentence processing , 1990 .

[8]  L P Shapiro,et al.  On-line comprehension of VP-ellipsis: Syntactic reconstruction and semantic influence , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[9]  C. Chambers,et al.  Structural Parallelism and Discourse Coherence: A Test of Centering Theory , 1998 .

[10]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Parsing Coordinates and Ellipsis: Copy α , 2001 .

[11]  Andrew Kehler,et al.  Coherence, reference, and the theory of grammar , 2002, CSLI lecture notes series.

[12]  B McElree,et al.  Sentence Comprehension Is Mediated by Content-Addressable Memory Structures , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[13]  Pia Knoeferle,et al.  Processing Parallel Structure: Evidence from Eye-Tracking and a Computational Model , 2007 .

[14]  Lewis P. Shapiro,et al.  Preferences for a Verb′s Complements and Their Use in Sentence Processing , 1993 .

[15]  David Swinney,et al.  The Psycholinguistics of Anaphora , 2008 .

[16]  Stephani Foraker,et al.  Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension , 2003 .

[17]  Pia Knoeferle,et al.  Constituent order and semantic parallelism in online comprehension: Eye-tracking evidence from German , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  D. Swinney,et al.  The Time Course of Verb Processing in Dutch Sentences , 2009, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[19]  E. Zurif,et al.  Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs , 1987, Cognition.

[20]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension , 1998 .

[21]  Arild Hestvik,et al.  Charting the time-course of VP-ellipsis sentence comprehension: Evidence for an initial and independent structural analysis. , 2003, Journal of memory and language.

[22]  C. Clifton,et al.  Parallel structure: A source of facilitation in sentence comprehension , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[23]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  M. Kutas,et al.  Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  B. McElree,et al.  A content-addressable pointer mechanism underlies comprehension of verb-phrase ellipsis , 2008 .

[26]  Ron Smyth,et al.  Grammatical determinants of ambiguous pronoun resolution , 1994 .

[27]  K Carlson,et al.  The Effects of Parallelism and Prosody in the Processing of Gapping Structures , 2001, Language and speech.

[28]  Dieuwke de Goede,et al.  Verbs in spoken sentence processing : Unraveling the activation pattern of the matrix verb pattern of the matrix verb , 2006 .

[29]  Todd R. Ferretti,et al.  Thematic Roles as Verb-specific Concepts , 1997 .

[30]  L Frazier,et al.  Processing Coordinate Structures , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[31]  D Swinney,et al.  Coreference processing and levels of analysis in object-relative constructions; Demonstration of antecedent reactivation with the cross-modal priming paradigm , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.