Quantitative ultrasound assessment of breast tumor response to chemotherapy using a multi-parameter approach

Purpose This study demonstrated the ability of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters in providing an early prediction of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Methods Using a 6-MHz array transducer, ultrasound radiofrequency (RF) data were collected from 58 LABC patients prior to NAC treatment and at weeks 1, 4, and 8 of their treatment, and prior to surgery. QUS parameters including midband fit (MBF), spectral slope (SS), spectral intercept (SI), spacing among scatterers (SAS), attenuation coefficient estimate (ACE), average scatterer diameter (ASD), and average acoustic concentration (AAC) were determined from the tumor region of interest. Ultrasound data were compared with the ultimate clinical and pathological response of the patient's tumor to treatment and patient recurrence-free survival. Results Multi-parameter discriminant analysis using the κ-nearest-neighbor classifier demonstrated that the best response classification could be achieved using the combination of MBF, SS, and SAS, with an accuracy of 60 ± 10% at week 1, 77 ± 8% at week 4 and 75 ± 6% at week 8. Furthermore, when the QUS measurements at each time (week) were combined with pre-treatment (week 0) QUS values, the classification accuracies improved (70 ± 9% at week 1, 80 ± 5% at week 4, and 81 ± 6% at week 8). Finally, the multi-parameter QUS model demonstrated a significant difference in survival rates of responding and non-responding patients at weeks 1 and 4 (p=0.035, and 0.027, respectively). Conclusion This study demonstrated for the first time, using new parameters tested on relatively large patient cohort and leave-one-out classifier evaluation, that a hybrid QUS biomarker including MBF, SS, and SAS could, with relatively high sensitivity and specificity, detect the response of LABC tumors to NAC as early as after 4 weeks of therapy. The findings of this study also suggested that incorporating pre-treatment QUS parameters of a tumor improved the classification results. This work demonstrated the potential of QUS and machine learning methods for the early assessment of breast tumor response to NAC and providing personalized medicine with regards to the treatment planning of refractory patients.

[1]  V. Reuter,et al.  Typing of prostate tissue by ultrasonic spectrum analysis , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[2]  E. Madsen,et al.  Interlaboratory Comparison of Backscatter Coefficient Estimates for Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms: , 2010 .

[3]  Michael C. Kolios,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound Evaluation of Tumor Cell Death Response in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[4]  W D O'Brien,et al.  Quantifying B‐mode images of in vivo rat mammary tumors by the frequency dependence of backscatter. , 2001, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[5]  Michael C. Kolios,et al.  Monitoring of cell death in epithelial cells using high frequency ultrasound spectroscopy. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  J. Nährig,et al.  Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose for monitoring primary chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  William D O'Brien,et al.  Frequency-dependent attenuation-compensation functions for ultrasonic signals backscattered from random media. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Roman Rouzier,et al.  Change in tumor cellularity of breast carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a variable in the pathologic assessment of response , 2004, Cancer.

[9]  Xiaohui Hao,et al.  Characterization of reperfused infarcted myocardium from high-frequency intracardiac ultrasound imaging using homodyned K distribution , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  E J Feleppa,et al.  Diagnostic spectrum analysis in ophthalmology: a physical perspective. , 1986, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  L. X. Yao,et al.  Backscatter Coefficient Measurements Using a Reference Phantom to Extract Depth-Dependent Instrumentation Factors , 1990, Ultrasonic imaging.

[12]  Michael C. Kolios,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound Characterization of Responses to Radiotherapy in Cancer Mouse Models , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[13]  Yassin Labyed,et al.  Estimate of the attenuation coefficient using a clinical array transducer for the detection of cervical ripening in human pregnancy. , 2011, Ultrasonics.

[14]  E. Feleppa,et al.  Relationship of Ultrasonic Spectral Parameters to Features of Tissue Microstructure , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[15]  Gregory J. Czarnota,et al.  Tumor radiation response enhancement by acoustical stimulation of the vasculature , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Carsten Denkert,et al.  Response-guided neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  William D O'Brien,et al.  Defining optimal axial and lateral resolution for estimating scatterer properties from volumes using ultrasound backscatter. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Application of autoregressive spectral analysis to cepstral estimation of mean scatterer spacing , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[19]  M. Oelze,et al.  Three-dimensional high-frequency backscatter and envelope quantification of cancerous human lymph nodes. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  Michael C. Kolios,et al.  Ultrasound imaging of apoptosis in tumor response: novel preclinical monitoring of photodynamic therapy effects. , 2008, Cancer research.

[21]  Michael C. Kolios,et al.  Conventional frequency ultrasonic biomarkers of cancer treatment response in vivo. , 2013, Translational oncology.

[22]  J. G. Miller,et al.  Myocardial ultrasonic backscatter for characterization of ischemia and reperfusion: relationship to wall motion. , 1990, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[23]  J. Nährig,et al.  Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose for monitoring primary chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  Timothy J Hall,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of In Vivo Breast Masses Using Ultrasound Attenuation and Backscatter , 2013, Ultrasonic imaging.

[25]  Ernest J. Feleppa,et al.  Ultrasonic spectral-parameter imaging of the prostate , 1997, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[26]  F. G. Sommer,et al.  Ultrasonic Characterization of Tissue Structure in the In Vivo Human Liver and Spleen , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[27]  Olsi Rama,et al.  Development of ultrasound tomography for breast imaging: technical assessment. , 2005, Medical physics.

[28]  Ali Sadeghi-Naini,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound characterization of locally advanced breast cancer by estimation of its scatterer properties. , 2014, Medical physics.

[29]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  High resolution ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation based on autoregressive spectral estimation using Burg's algorithm , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[30]  William D. O'Brien,et al.  Differentiation and characterization of rat mammary fibroadenomas and 4T1 mouse carcinomas using quantitative ultrasound imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[31]  J. Peto,et al.  Asymptotically Efficient Rank Invariant Test Procedures , 1972 .

[32]  U. Sharma,et al.  Longitudinal study of the assessment by MRI and diffusion‐weighted imaging of tumor response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2009, NMR in biomedicine.

[33]  S. Giordano,et al.  Update on locally advanced breast cancer. , 2003, The oncologist.

[34]  Martin J. Yaffe,et al.  Early prediction of therapy responses and outcomes in breast cancer patients using quantitative ultrasound spectral texture , 2014, Oncotarget.

[35]  N. Duric,et al.  In vivo breast sound-speed imaging with ultrasound tomography. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[36]  Peter E. Hart,et al.  Nearest neighbor pattern classification , 1967, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[37]  E J Feleppa,et al.  Comparison of theoretical scattering results and ultrasonic data from clinical liver examinations. , 1988, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[38]  Kevin Brindle,et al.  New approaches for imaging tumour responses to treatment , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[39]  T J Hall,et al.  Parametric Ultrasound Imaging from Backscatter Coefficient Measurements: Image Formation and Interpretation , 1990, Ultrasonic imaging.

[40]  Daniel F. Hayes,et al.  Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA to Monitor Metastatic Breast Cancer , 2013 .

[41]  M. Okada,et al.  [New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours-revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)]. , 2009, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[42]  Gregory J. Czarnota,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound monitoring of breast tumor response to chemotherapy by analysis of frequency-dependent attenuation and backscattered power , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[43]  Hany Soliman,et al.  Diffuse optical spectroscopy evaluation of treatment response in women with locally advanced breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2012, Translational oncology.

[44]  Timothy J. Hall,et al.  Ultrasound Attenuation Measurements Using a Reference Phantom with Sound Speed Mismatch , 2011, Ultrasonic imaging.

[45]  Gregory J. Czarnota,et al.  Non-invasive evaluation of breast cancer response to chemotherapy using quantitative ultrasonic backscatter parameters , 2015, Medical Image Anal..