experimental animals: Cautionary notes Constructing receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) with

click here top right corner of the article or Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article-sign up in the box at the

[1]  B B Murdock,et al.  Criterion change in continuous recognition memory. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  A P Yonelinas,et al.  The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: a formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Recollection-like memory retrieval in rats is dependent on the hippocampus , 2004, Nature.

[4]  Michael R. Healy,et al.  Dual-process models of associative recognition in young and older adults: evidence from receiver operating characteristics. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  M. Glanzer,et al.  Slope of the receiver-operating characteristic in recognition memory. , 1999 .

[6]  J. Wixted.  Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[7]  A. Yonelinas.  Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[8]  A. Heathcote.  Item Recognition Memory and the ROC , 2003 .

[9]  Howard Eichenbaum,et al.  Recognition memory: opposite effects of hippocampal damage on recollection and familiarity , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  J. Wixted.  A Signal Detection Analysis of Memory for Nonoccurrence in Pigeons , 1993 .

[11]  Peter E. Wais,et al.  The Hippocampus Supports both the Recollection and the Familiarity Components of Recognition Memory , 2006, Neuron.

[12]  K. White,et al.  On the effects of signaling reinforcer probability and magnitude in delayed matching to sample. , 2005, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  W. Roberts,et al.  Reinforcement expectancy and trial spacing effects in delayed matching-to-sample by pigeons , 1985 .

[14]  K. Norman,et al.  Effect of unitization on associative recognition in amnesia , 2007, Hippocampus.

[15]  James P. Egan,et al.  Recognition memory and the operating characteristic. , 1958 .

[16]  A. Yonelinas.  Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  M. Davison,et al.  Signal probability, reinforcement and signal detection. , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[18]  C. Rotello,et al.  Strong memories obscure weak memories in associative recognition , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  Caren M. Rotello,et al.  Recall-to-Reject in Recognition: Evidence from ROC Curves ☆ ☆☆ , 2000 .

[20]  R. Tunney,et al.  Effects of retention intervals on receiver operating characteristics in artificial grammar learning. , 2007, Acta psychologica.

[21]  T. DeMarse,et al.  Enhancement of matching acquisition by differential comparison-outcome associations. , 1993 .

[22]  Neil Burgess,et al.  Impaired memory for scenes but not faces in developmental hippocampal amnesia: A case study , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  M. A. Trapold,et al.  Are expectancies based upon different positive reinforcing events discriminably different , 1970 .

[24]  Scott D. Slotnick,et al.  Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[25]  R. J. Irwin,et al.  Stability of memory for colour in context. , 1998, Memory.

[26]  G. Kimble,et al.  Recognition memory for words and pictures at short and long retention intervals , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[27]  The effect of sample and comparison ratio schedules on delayed matching to sample in the pigeon , 1978 .