Information dissemination dynamics in delay tolerant network: a bipartite network approach

In this paper, we present a model of a delay tolerant network(DTN) and identify that this model can be suitably reformulated as a bipartite network and that the major predictions from the former are equivalent to that of the latter. In particular, we show that the coverage of the information dissemination process in the DTN matches accurately with the size of the largest component in the suitably thresholded one-mode projection of the corresponding bipartite network. In the process of this analysis, some of the important insights gained are that (a) arbitrarily increasing the number of agents participating in the dissemination process cannot increase the coverage once the system has reached the stationary state for a given buffer time (i.e., the time for which a message resides in the buffer of the places visited by the agents), (b) the coverage varies inversely with the square of the number of places in the system and directly with the square of the average social participation of the agents and (c) it is possible to design an optimal buffer time for a desired cost of coverage. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first such work that employs the rich theoretical backbone of bipartite networks as a "proxy" for the analysis of the otherwise intractable DTN dynamics thus allowing for various novel analytical estimates.

[1]  Arun Venkataramani,et al.  DTN routing as a resource allocation problem , 2007, SIGCOMM '07.

[2]  A. Deutsch,et al.  Coverage-maximization in networks under resource constraints. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  Xiaoyan Hong,et al.  Analysis for bio-inspired thrown-box assisted message dissemination in delay tolerant networks , 2013, Telecommun. Syst..

[4]  Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos,et al.  Distributed stochastic optimization in opportunistic networks: the case of optimal relay selection , 2010, CHANTS '10.

[5]  Niloy Ganguly,et al.  Modeling broadcasting using omnidirectional and directional antenna in delay tolerant networks as an epidemic dynamics , 2010, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[6]  Ellen W. Zegura,et al.  Capacity Enhancement using Throwboxes in DTNs , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems.

[7]  Jean-Yves Le Boudec,et al.  The age of gossip: spatial mean field regime , 2009, SIGMETRICS '09.

[8]  Injong Rhee,et al.  SLAW: A New Mobility Model for Human Walks , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[9]  Shanika Karunasekera,et al.  Improving performance in delay/disruption tolerant networks through passive relay points , 2012, Wirel. Networks.

[10]  D. Freedman,et al.  Finite Exchangeable Sequences , 1980 .

[11]  Niloy Ganguly,et al.  Modeling discrete combinatorial systems as alphabetic bipartite networks: theory and applications. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  Cauligi S. Raghavendra,et al.  Spray and Focus: Efficient Mobility-Assisted Routing for Heterogeneous and Correlated Mobility , 2007, Fifth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerComW'07).

[13]  Pan Hui,et al.  An architecture enabling Bluetooth/sup TM//Jini/sup TM/ interoperability , 2004, 2004 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8754).

[14]  Niloy Ganguly,et al.  Emergence of a non-scaling degree distribution in bipartite networks: A numerical and analytical study , 2007 .

[15]  Qinghua Li,et al.  Multicasting in delay tolerant networks: a social network perspective , 2009, MobiHoc '09.

[16]  Ioannis Stavrakakis,et al.  A study of information dissemination under multiple random walkers and replication mechanisms , 2010, MobiOpp '10.

[17]  Arobinda Gupta,et al.  Probabilistic routing using contact sequencing in delay tolerant networks , 2010, 2010 Second International Conference on COMmunication Systems and NETworks (COMSNETS 2010).

[18]  Vassilios V. Dimakopoulos,et al.  On the Performance of Flooding-Based Resource Discovery , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[19]  Pan Hui,et al.  An architecture enabling Bluetooth , 2004 .

[20]  Jie Wu,et al.  Predict and relay: an efficient routing in disruption-tolerant networks , 2009, MobiHoc '09.

[21]  Tracy Camp,et al.  A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research , 2002, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[22]  Zygmunt J. Haas,et al.  The shared wireless infostation model: a new ad hoc networking paradigm (or where there is a whale, there is a way) , 2003, MobiHoc '03.

[23]  David A. Maltz,et al.  A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols , 1998, MobiCom '98.

[24]  Noga Alon,et al.  Many Random Walks Are Faster Than One , 2011, Comb. Probab. Comput..

[25]  Christian Bettstetter,et al.  Mobility modeling in wireless networks: categorization, smooth movement, and border effects , 2001, MOCO.

[26]  Niloy Ganguly,et al.  Understanding how both the partitions of a bipartite network affect its one-mode projection , 2011, 1105.3902.