Integrating Multiple Perspectives in Social Multicriteria Evaluation of Flood-Mitigation Alternatives: The Case of Malborghetto-Valbruna

There is an increasing demand for a new paradigm to improve flood-mitigation decision processes that calls for risk-reduction strategies at several levels. This demand may gain ground only if dialogue is encouraged among different perspectives, disciplines, and knowledge types. The aim of this paper is to explore new methods to improve flood-mitigation decision processes. A growing body of evidence suggests that the involvement of the local actors is a key aspect in successful decision making. Following this premise, we analyze a recent case of controversy in flood mitigation in Malborghetto-Valbruna (Northern Italy), using social multicriteria evaluation (SMCE) and social actors' narrative analysis. Six alternatives are defined and the different positions adopted by the local actors are described. The different narratives of the actors are also analyzed to allow the identification of improvement routes for a more accurate SMCE of flood-mitigation alternatives. Thus, this case study suggests that the analysis of narratives is a useful tool to complement SMCE.

[1]  M. Rokeach,et al.  The Nature Of Human Values , 1974 .

[2]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  A multicriteria analysis for water resource and land use development , 1977 .

[3]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .

[4]  B. Paul,et al.  Flood problems in Bangladesh: Is there an indigenous solution? , 1987 .

[5]  Timothy Beatley.  Towards a Moral Philosophy of Natural Disaster Mitigation , 1989 .

[6]  Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions : L.H. Gunderson, C.S. Holling and S.S. Light, Eds., 1995. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, xiv + 593 pp. ISBN 0-231-10102-3 , 1996 .

[7]  Raymond J. Burby,et al.  Cooperating with nature : confronting natural hazards with land use planning for sustainable communities , 1998 .

[8]  Maureen Fordham,et al.  Participatory Planning for Flood Mitigation: Models and Approaches , 1999 .

[9]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  Multi-criteria methods for quantitative, qualitative and fuzzy evaluation problems , 1999 .

[10]  Silvio Funtowicz,et al.  Combining participative and institutional approaches with multicriteria evaluation. An empirical study for water issues in Troina, Sicily , 2000 .

[11]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Narrative valuation in a policy judgment context , 2000 .

[12]  Dennis Chong.  Rational Lives: Norms and Values in Politics and Society , 2000 .

[13]  R. Gregory,et al.  Bringing stakeholder values into environmental policy choices: a community-based estuary case study , 2001 .

[14]  J. Handmer,et al.  Improving flood warnings in Europe: a research and policy agenda , 2001 .

[15]  A. Steinemann,et al.  Environmental Values and Adaptive Management , 2001, Environmental Values.

[16]  Harri Ehtamo,et al.  Evaluating a Framework for Multi-Stakeholder Decision Support in Water Resources Management , 2001 .

[17]  Public involvement in the Red River Basin management decisions and preparedness for the next flood , 2002 .

[18]  R. Gregory,et al.  Incorporating Value Trade-offs into Community-Based Environmental Risk Decisions , 2002, Environmental Values.

[19]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  "Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation" (SMCE)" , 2003 .

[20]  L. Pearce.  Disaster Management and Community Planning, and Public Participation: How to Achieve Sustainable Hazard Mitigation , 2003 .

[21]  Bert Enserink,et al.  Thinking the unthinkable – the end of the Dutch river dike system? Exploring a new safety concept for the river management , 2004 .

[22]  Carlos A. Bana e Costa,et al.  Multicriteria Evaluation of Flood Control Measures: The Case of Ribeira do Livramento , 2004 .

[23]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Participatory multicriteria decision analysis with Web-HIPRE: a case of lake regulation policy , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..

[24]  T. Seager,et al.  Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Decision Making , 2005, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[25]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Sustainable Development , 2005 .

[26]  A. Sinclair,et al.  Values and floodplain management: Case studies from the Red River Basin, Canada , 2005 .

[27]  Ângela Guimarães Pereira,et al.  Participatory Methods for Water Resources Planning , 2006 .

[28]  J. Maršálek,et al.  Flood Risk Management: Hazards, Vulnerability and Mitigation Measures , 2006 .

[29]  R. Burby.  Hurricane Katrina and the Paradoxes of Government Disaster Policy: Bringing About Wise Governmental Decisions for Hazardous Areas , 2006 .

[30]  A. Stirling.  Analysis, participation and power: justification and closure in participatory multi-criteria analysis , 2006 .

[31]  F. Messner,et al.  FLOOD DAMAGE, VULNERABILITY AND RISK PERCEPTION – CHALLENGES FOR FLOOD DAMAGE RESEARCH , 2006 .

[32]  Jochen Schanze,et al.  FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT – A BASIC FRAMEWORK , 2006 .

[33]  G. Gamboa.  Social multi-criteria evaluation of different development scenarios of the Aysén region, Chile , 2006 .

[34]  S. Simonovic.  Sustainable floodplain management and participatory planning in the red river basin, canada , 2007 .

[35]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  The problem of windfarm location: A social multi-criteria evaluation framework , 2007 .

[36]  P. Pigeon.  From structural to systemic : proposals to make french flood management more consistent and robust , 2010 .