Conformal prediction for anomaly detection and collision alert in space surveillance

Anomaly detection has been considered as an important technique for detecting critical events in a wide range of data rich applications where a majority of the data is inconsequential and/or uninteresting. We study the detection of anomalous behaviors among space objects using the theory of conformal prediction for distribution-independent on-line learning to provide collision alerts with a desirable confidence level. We exploit the fact that conformal predictors provide valid forecasted sets at specified confidence levels under the relatively weak assumption that the normal training data, together with the normal testing data, are generated from the same distribution. If the actual observation is not included in the conformal prediction set, it is classified as anomalous at the corresponding significance level. Interpreting the significance level as an upper bound of the probability that a normal observation is mistakenly classified as anomalous, we can conveniently adjust the sensitivity to anomalies while controlling the false alarm rate without having to find the application specific threshold. The proposed conformal prediction method was evaluated for a space surveillance application using the open source North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) catalog data. The validity of the prediction sets is justified by the empirical error rate that matches the significance level. In addition, experiments with simulated anomalous data indicate that anomaly detection sensitivity with conformal prediction is superior to that of the existing methods in declaring potential collision events.

[1]  T. S. Kelso,et al.  Satellite orbital conjunction reports assessing threatening encounters in space (SOCRATES) , 2006, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[2]  Felix R. Hoots,et al.  General Perturbations Theories Derived from the 1965 Lane Drag Theory , 1979 .

[3]  Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte,et al.  A new method for the nonlinear transformation of means and covariances in filters and estimators , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[4]  Dinh-Tuan Pham,et al.  Improving the singular evolutive extended Kalman filter for strongly nonlinear models for use in ocean data assimilation , 2001 .

[5]  Erik Blasch,et al.  Sensor management for collision alert in orbital object tracking , 2011, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[6]  F. Daum Nonlinear filters: beyond the Kalman filter , 2005, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.

[7]  Ting Wang,et al.  Analysis of Debris from the Collision of the Cosmos 2251 and the Iridium 33 Satellites , 2010 .

[8]  P. Houtekamer,et al.  Data Assimilation Using an Ensemble Kalman Filter Technique , 1998 .

[9]  J. Fowler,et al.  An extended Kalman filter in a dynamic spherical coordinate (DYSC) system for space based satellite tracking , 1985 .

[10]  Erik Blasch,et al.  Applying Aerospace Technologies to Current Issues Using Systems Engineering: 3rd AESS chapter summit , 2013 .

[11]  W. Gilks,et al.  Following a moving target—Monte Carlo inference for dynamic Bayesian models , 2001 .

[12]  W. Gasarch,et al.  The Book Review Column 1 Coverage Untyped Systems Simple Types Recursive Types Higher-order Systems General Impression 3 Organization, and Contents of the Book , 2022 .

[13]  D. D. Mueller,et al.  Fundamentals of Astrodynamics , 1971 .

[14]  A. Krener,et al.  Nonlinear observers with linearizable error dynamics , 1985 .

[15]  Nguyen Duong,et al.  Orbit determination by range-only data. , 1973 .

[16]  Erik Blasch,et al.  Comparison of several space target tracking filters , 2009, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[17]  F. Daum Exact finite dimensional nonlinear filters , 1985, 1985 24th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[18]  J. Grizzle,et al.  Observer design for nonlinear systems with discrete-time measurements , 1995, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[19]  D.S. Bernstein,et al.  Spacecraft tracking using sampled-data Kalman filters , 2008, IEEE Control Systems.

[20]  G. Evensen Data Assimilation: The Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2006 .

[21]  Thiagalingam Kirubarajan,et al.  Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation , 2001 .

[22]  N. Gordon,et al.  Novel approach to nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian state estimation , 1993 .

[23]  Salvatore Alfano,et al.  Determining satellite close approaches , 1992 .

[24]  Silverio Bolognani,et al.  Extended Kalman filter tuning in sensorless PMSM drives , 2002, Proceedings of the Power Conversion Conference-Osaka 2002 (Cat. No.02TH8579).

[25]  Linda L. Crawford,et al.  An analytic method to determine future close approaches between satellites , 1984 .

[26]  Vesselin P. Jilkov,et al.  A survey of maneuvering target tracking: approximation techniques for nonlinear filtering , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[27]  Yakov Bar-Shalom,et al.  Multitarget-Multisensor Tracking: Principles and Techniques , 1995 .

[28]  Howard D. Curtis,et al.  Orbital Mechanics for Engineering Students , 2005 .

[29]  D. Vallado Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications , 1997 .

[30]  Dimitrios Charalampidis,et al.  Designing Collision Alert System for Space Situational Awareness , 2010 .

[31]  Erik Blasch,et al.  Space object tracking with delayed measurements , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[32]  Genshe Chen,et al.  A range rate based detection technique for tracking a maneuvering target , 2005, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[33]  V.L. Pisacane,et al.  Orbit Determination from Passive Range Observations , 1974, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[34]  Jeffrey K. Uhlmann,et al.  Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[35]  Neil J. Gordon,et al.  Editors: Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice , 2001 .