Comparison between Palatal Configurations in UCLP Infants with and without a Hotz Plate until Four Years of Age

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of presurgical orthopedic treatment three dimensionally, we previously developed a novel measuring system and described the efficacy of the treatment until 18 months of age. The aim of this study was to compare palatal configuration in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) infants fitted with a Hotz plate to those without it until four years of age using the same measuring system. Patients: Twenty complete UCLP infants were divided into two groups. A Hotz plate was used with 12 patients who first visited our clinic from January 1990 to March 1992 and was not used with an additional eight patients who first visited from April 1992 to July 1993. Main outcome measures: Palatal casts taken from birth until four years of age were measured three dimensionally and were compared between the two groups. Results and Conclusions: The width of the palate was larger in the group with a Hotz plate than in the group without it at four years of age. No difference was observed between the anteroposterior distance of the palate in the two groups at four years of age. Similarly, the alveolar arch form did not differ between the two groups. The degree of curvature of the palatal surface was smaller in the group with a Hotz plate than in the group without it. These data were similar to data obtained at 18 months of age.

[1]  B. Mcpeek,et al.  Ethical Principles in Research , 1998 .

[2]  K. Mishima,et al.  Three-dimensional comparison between the palatal forms in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate with and without Hotz plate from cheiloplasty to palatoplasty. , 1996, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[3]  E. Söderpalm,et al.  Maxillary dental arch and occlusion in patients with repaired clefts of the secondary palate. Influence of push back palatal surgery. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[4]  O. Kriens Data-objective diagnosis of infant cleft lip, alveolus, and palate. Morphologic data guiding understanding and treatment concepts. , 1991, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[5]  S. Bolund,et al.  Craniofacial and occlusal characteristics in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients from four Scandinavian centres. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[6]  W. Hochban,et al.  Presurgical orthopaedic treatment using hard plates. , 1989, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[7]  J. Weil Orthopaedic growth guidance and stimulation for patients with cleft lip and palate. , 1987, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[8]  J. Bardach,et al.  Late Results of Primary Veloplasty: The Marburg Project , 1984, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  Huddart Ag Presurgical changes in unilateral cleft palate subjects. , 1979 .

[10]  W. Gnoinski,et al.  Comprehensive care of cleft lip and palate children at Zürich university: a preliminary report. , 1976, American journal of orthodontics.

[11]  R. S. Bodenham,et al.  The evaluation of arch form and occlusion in unilateral cleft palate subjects. , 1972, The Cleft palate journal.

[12]  C. Tennison THE REPAIR OF THE UNILATERAL CLEFT LIP BY THE STENCIL METHOD , 1952, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.