Pathways to Digital Service Innovation: The Role of Digital Transformation Strategies in Established Organizations

Digital technologies are radically changing how established organizations design novel services. Digital transformation (DT) strategies are executed to manage the transition from product-centric to service-centric business models based on digital technologies. However, little is known about what configurations of DT strategies lead to successful digital service innovation (DSI) in established organizations. We employ fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis on a set of 17 case studies of DT strategies from established organizations with different industry backgrounds. We identify several distinct configurations of DT strategies that lead to successful and unsuccessful DSI. Based on these configurations, we deduce that the threat of digital disruption negatively impacts an organization’s innovation activities. Furthermore, we find that strategic partnerships can be leveraged by organizations that face an imminent threat of digital disruption while organizations with competitive advantages may rely on “do-it-yourself” approaches. Lastly, we find that the involvement of a C-level executive is a necessary requirement for successful DSI. Our results contribute to theory by integrating research on DSI and DT, providing a perspective on DSI failure, and employing a configurational research approach that allows us to highlight interdependencies between factors as well as insights into the individual factors. Furthermore, we provide actionable recommendations for executives.

[1]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[2]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[3]  I. Miles Innovation in Services , 1995 .

[4]  D. Teece Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation☆ , 1996 .

[5]  Christopher L. Shook,et al.  Organizational Configurations And Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[6]  Robert Drazin,et al.  Equifinality: Functional Equivalence in Organization Design , 1997 .

[7]  P. Hertog KNOWLEDGE-INTENSIVE BUSINESS SERVICES AS CO-PRODUCERS OF INNOVATION , 2000 .

[8]  Willow A. Sheremata Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces in Radical New Product Development Under Time Pressure , 2000 .

[9]  Ping Zhang,et al.  The Effects of Animation on Information Seeking Performance on the World Wide Web: Securing Attention or Interfering with Primary Tasks? , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Creativity under the gun. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[11]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Identity Ambiguity and Change in the Wake of a Corporate Spin-off , 2004 .

[13]  Gerald G. Grant,et al.  Framing the Frameworks: A Review of IT Governance Research , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Redesigning social inquiry , 2008 .

[16]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Qualitative Comparative Analysis Using Fuzzy Sets (fsQCA) , 2008 .

[17]  Benoît Rihoux,et al.  Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) As an Approach , 2009 .

[18]  Philip Yetton,et al.  Allocation of IT Decision Rights in Multibusiness Organizations: What Decisions, Who Makes Them, and when are They Taken? , 2010, ICIS.

[19]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Influencing the effectiveness of IT governance practices through steering committees and communication policies , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Bart Van Looy,et al.  Structural ambidexterity in NPD processes: A firm-level assessment of the impact of differentiated structures on innovation performance , 2010 .

[22]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Research Commentary - Seeking the Configurations of Digital Ecodynamics: It Takes Three to Tango , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  P. Tetlock,et al.  The Effects of Top Management Team Integrative Complexity and Decentralized Decision Making on Corporate Social Performance , 2011 .

[24]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Service innovation: why is it so difficult to accomplish? , 2011 .

[25]  Colin Cheng,et al.  Dynamic service innovation capability, radical service innovation and open business models , 2011, Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manag..

[26]  A. Weber,et al.  Mobile service innovation: A European failure , 2011 .

[27]  Peer C. Fiss Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research , 2011 .

[28]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[29]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis , 2012 .

[30]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  Strategizing information systems-enabled organizational transformation: A transdisciplinary review and new directions , 2012, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Xavier Basurto,et al.  Structuring the Calibration of Qualitative Data as Sets for Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) , 2010 .

[32]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: Contents , 2012 .

[33]  C. Markides Business Model Innovation: What Can the Ambidexterity Literature Teach US? , 2013 .

[34]  Thomas Greckhamer,et al.  Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research Chapter 3 The Two QCAs : From a Small-N to a Large-N Set Theoretic Approach , 2013 .

[35]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  Embrace•perform•model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities , 2014 .

[36]  Hongyi Li,et al.  Who Lives in the C-Suite? Organizational Structure and the Division of Labor in Top Management , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[37]  Frans van den Bosch,et al.  Top Management Team Shared Leadership and Organizational Ambidexterity: a Moderated Mediation Framework , 2014 .

[38]  Nicholas Economides,et al.  Mobile Money in Tanzania , 2015 .

[39]  R. Gilbert E-Books: A Tale of Digital Disruption , 2015 .

[40]  A. O'Cass,et al.  Achieving service quality through service innovation exploration-exploitation: The critical role of employee empowerment and slack resources , 2015 .

[41]  Robert F. Lusch,et al.  Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective , 2015, MIS Q..

[42]  Andre Hanelt,et al.  Entering the Digital Era - The Impact of Digital Technology-related M&As on Business Model Innovations of Automobile OEMs , 2015, ICIS.

[43]  Meutia,et al.  The Influence of Competitive Pressure on Innovative Creativity , 2015 .

[44]  Thomas Hess,et al.  Digital Transformation Strategies , 2015, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[45]  Catharina von Koskull,et al.  Exploring value propositions and service innovation: a service-dominant logic study , 2015 .

[46]  P. Beneito,et al.  Competitive Pressure and Innovation at the Firm Level , 2015 .

[47]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service Innovation in the Digital Age: Key Contributions and Future Directions , 2015, MIS Q..

[48]  Shirish C. Srivastava,et al.  Bridging the Service Divide Through Digitally Enabled Service Innovations: Evidence from Indian Healthcare Service Providers , 2015, MIS Q..

[49]  Andre Hanelt,et al.  Transforming Industrial Business: The Impact of Digital Transformation on Automotive Organizations , 2015, ICIS.

[50]  Hanna Hottenrott,et al.  R&D Partnerships and Innovation Performance: Can There Be Too Much of a Good Thing? , 2014 .

[51]  A. Griffin,et al.  Perspective: New Service Development: How the Field Developed, Its Current Status and Recommendations for Moving the Field Forward , 2016 .

[52]  Thomas Hess,et al.  Understanding Digital Transformation Strategy formation: Insights from Europe's Automotive Industry , 2016, PACIS.

[53]  Claudius Wagemann,et al.  QCA and business research: Work in progress or a consolidated agenda? , 2016 .

[54]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  How LEGO Built the Foundations and Enterprise Capabilities for Digital Leadership , 2016, MIS Q. Executive.

[55]  Patricia Klarner,et al.  Crossing Boundaries: Organization Design Parameters Surrounding CDOs and Their Digital Transformation Activities , 2016, AMCIS.

[56]  Michael Lettenmeier,et al.  Transport reduction by crowdsourced deliveries – a library case in Finland , 2016 .

[57]  Ricarda B. Bouncken,et al.  Business model innovation in alliances: Successful configurations , 2016 .

[58]  Panos E. Kourouthanassis,et al.  Explaining online shopping behavior with fsQCA: The role of cognitive and affective perceptions , 2016 .

[59]  Thomas Hess,et al.  Options for Formulating a Digital Transformation Strategy , 2020, MIS Q. Executive.

[60]  Alexander Benlian,et al.  The Role of the CIO and the CDO in an Organization's Digital Transformation , 2016, ICIS.

[61]  Benjamin Mueller,et al.  Helping Employees to be Digital Transformers - the Olympus.connect Case , 2017, ICIS.

[62]  Luigi Mario De Luca,et al.  Linking data-rich environments with service innovation in incumbent firms: a conceptual framework and research propositions , 2017 .

[63]  Vassilis Kostakos,et al.  Applying configurational analysis to IS behavioural research: a methodological alternative for modelling combinatorial complexities , 2017, Inf. Syst. J..

[64]  Andrea Back,et al.  Disentangling the Fuzzy Front End of Digital Transformation: Activities and Approaches , 2017, ICIS.

[65]  M. Kathryn Brohman,et al.  Dynamic Ambidexterity: Exploiting Exploration for Business Success in the Digital Age , 2017, ICIS.

[66]  Nicholas Economides,et al.  Mobile Money in Tanzania , 2015, Mark. Sci..

[67]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  The Role of Business Intelligence and Communication Technologies in Organizational Agility: A Configurational Approach , 2017, Journal of the Association for Information Systems.

[68]  Thomas Hess,et al.  How Chief Digital Officers Promote the Digital Transformation of their Companies , 2020, MIS Q. Executive.

[69]  Peter Naudé,et al.  Addressing the ‘Qualitative’ in fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis: the generic membership evaluation template , 2017 .

[70]  Peng Huang,et al.  Does One Size Fit All? Theorizing Governance Configurations for Digital Innovation , 2018, ICIS.

[71]  Pai Zheng,et al.  A systematic design approach for service innovation of smart product-service systems , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[72]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Big data and business analytics ecosystems: paving the way towards digital transformation and sustainable societies , 2018, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[73]  Tony Cornford,et al.  Unravelling causal and temporal influences underpinning monitoring systems success: A typological approach , 2018, Inf. Syst. J..

[74]  René Chester Goduscheit,et al.  Paths Toward Radical Service Innovation in Manufacturing Companies-A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective , 2018, Journal of Product Innovation Management.

[75]  Johan Sandberg,et al.  Digital Disruption , 2018, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[76]  Thomas Greckhamer,et al.  Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis: Best practices in strategy and organization research , 2018, Strategic Organization.

[77]  A. Dudau,et al.  Innovation failure in the eye of the beholder: towards a theory of innovation shaped by competing agendas within higher education , 2018 .

[78]  Thomas Hess,et al.  Digital transformation strategy making in pre-digital organizations: The case of a financial services provider , 2019, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[79]  A. Dușa QCA with R , 2019 .

[80]  A. Johansson,et al.  The role of customer knowledge development for incremental and radical service innovation in servitized manufacturers , 2019, Journal of Business Research.

[81]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Fuzzy set analysis as a means to understand users of 21st-century learning systems: The case of mobile learning and reflections on learning analytics research , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[82]  Gregory Vial,et al.  Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda , 2019, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[83]  Christian Kowalkowski,et al.  Organizing for Digital Servitization: A Service Ecosystem Perspective , 2019, Journal of Business Research.

[84]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  Clarifying the Notion of Digital Transformation: A Transdisciplinary Review of Literature , 2019 .

[85]  J. Leimeister,et al.  How to scale up contact-intensive services: ICT-enabled service innovation , 2019, Journal of Service Management.

[86]  Daniel Beimborn,et al.  AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT IN THE DIGITAL ERA: HOW DIGTIAL INNOVATION LABS FACILITATE KNOWLEDGE RECOMBINATION , 2022 .

[87]  Barbara Vis,et al.  Addressing the Challenges Related to Transforming Qualitative Into Quantitative Data in Qualitative Comparative Analysis , 2019 .

[88]  Koji Kimita,et al.  A Configurational Approach to Servitization: Review and Research Directions , 2019, Service Science.

[89]  Daniel J. Veit,et al.  A service-dominant logic perspective on the roles of technology in service innovation: uncovering four archetypes in the sharing economy , 2019, Journal of Business Economics.

[90]  Rohit Nishant,et al.  QCA and the harnessing of unstructured qualitative data , 2020, Inf. Syst. J..

[91]  André Hanelt,et al.  A Systematic Review of the Literature on Digital Transformation: Insights and Implications for Strategy and Organizational Change , 2020, Journal of Management Studies.

[92]  J. Wincent,et al.  An agile co-creation process for digital servitization: A micro-service innovation approach , 2020 .

[93]  Patricia Klarner,et al.  How do chief digital officers pursue digital transformation activities? The role of organization design parameters , 2020, Long Range Planning.

[94]  Markus Böhm,et al.  On the Use of Qualitative Comparative Analysis in Information Systems Research - A Critical Review , 2020, ECIS.

[95]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  Digital Transformation in Health Care: Augmented Reality for Hands-Free Service Innovation , 2019, Information Systems Frontiers.

[96]  Christian Kowalkowski,et al.  Transformational Shifts through Digital Servitization , 2020, Industrial Marketing Management.