Enhancing Main Idea Comprehension for Students with Learning Problems

This study investigated the effectiveness of a main idea strategy and self-monitoring instructional procedure for improving comprehension of textual material in students with high-incidence (e.g., learning and behavioral) disabilities. Thirty-three middle school students with disabilities were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. Students in the experimental condition were trained to identify and generate main idea statements using main idea strategy instruction and a self-monitoring procedure. Results indicated that the instructional procedures led to increased reading comprehension of students in the experimental group on the training measure, which was maintained over time. On near and far transfer measures, the experimental group statistically outperformed students in the control group on posttest and delayed posttest items requiring selection responses. Students in the experimental group maintained strategy usage 6 weeks later on selection type responses on the near transfer measure but, not on the far transfer measure. Implications for practice are discussed.

[1]  P. David Pearson,et al.  Explicit Comprehension Instruction: A Review of Research and a New Conceptualization of Instruction , 1987, The Elementary School Journal.

[2]  J. Fitzgerald,et al.  Helping parents to read expository literature to their children: Promoting main‐idea and detail understanding , 1997 .

[3]  C. Spring,et al.  Teaching community-college students to follow the train of thought in expository texts , 1992 .

[4]  T. Wildman,et al.  Facilitating Reading Comprehension in Learning Disabled Students , 1990 .

[5]  Pearl L. Seidenberg.  Relating Text-Processing Research to Reading and Writing Instruction for Learning Disabled Students. , 1989 .

[6]  Deborah J. Smith,et al.  The Effects of Teaching a Summary Skills Strategy to Students Identified as Learning Disabled on Their Comprehension of Science Text , 1992 .

[7]  Comparisons of Learning Ease and Transfer Propensity in Poor and Average Readers , 1991, Journal of learning disabilities.

[8]  M Gajria,et al.  The Effects of Summarization Instruction on Text Comprehension of Students with Learning Disabilities , 1992, Exceptional children.

[9]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  EFFECTS OF A DIRECT INSTRUCTION MAIN IDEA SUMMARIZATION PROGRAM AND SELF‐MONITORING ON READING COMPREHENSION OF MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES , 1998 .

[10]  R. Newman,et al.  Development Aspects of Self-Regulated Learning , 1990 .

[11]  M. Mastropieri,et al.  Reading Comprehension Instruction: Summarization and Self-Monitoring Training for Students with Learning Disabilities , 1991, Exceptional children.

[12]  B. Wong.  Instructional Parameters Promoting Transfer of Learned Strategies in Students with Learning Disabilities , 1994 .

[13]  Steve Graham,et al.  Direct teaching, strategy instruction, and strategy instruction with explicit self-regulation: Effects on the composition skills and self-efficacy of students with learning disabilities. , 1992 .

[14]  E. Frates,et al.  Behavior Change , 2019, Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

[15]  Anne W. Graves,et al.  Effects of direct instruction and metacomprehension training on finding main ideas. , 1986 .

[16]  D. Mcdougall,et al.  Research on Self-Management Techniques Used by Students with Disabilities in General Education Settings , 1998 .

[17]  Joanna P. Williams,et al.  An Instructional Program in Comprehension of Narrative Themes for Adolescents with Learning Disabilities , 1994 .

[18]  Jo Webber,et al.  Research on Self-Monitoring as a Behavior Management Technique in Special Education Classrooms , 1993 .

[19]  Richard Beach,et al.  The Effects of Text Structure Instruction on Middle-Grade Students' Comprehension and Production of Expository Text. , 1984 .

[20]  W. Bender.  Behavioral Indicators of Temperament and Personality in the Inactive Learner , 1987, Journal of learning disabilities.

[21]  Joel R. Levin,et al.  Comparison if Monitoring and Mnemonic Text-Processing Strategies in Learning Disabled Students , 1989 .

[22]  Victoria Chou Hare.  Text Effects on Main Idea Comprehension. , 1989 .

[23]  L. Chan.  Promoting Strategy Generalization Through Self-Instructional Training in Students with Reading Disabilities , 1991, Journal of learning disabilities.

[24]  S. Vaughn,et al.  Planning for mainstreamed special education students : perceptions of general classroom teachers , 1992 .

[25]  Joanna P. Williams.  Identifying main ideas: A basic aspect of reading comprehension , 1988 .

[26]  L. Bambara,et al.  Issues surrounding the use of self-management interventions in the schools. , 1992 .

[27]  Peter G. Cole,et al.  Effects of Instruction in the Use of a Visual-Imagery Strategy on the Reading-Comprehension Competence of Disabled and Average Readers , 1990 .

[28]  G. Tindal,et al.  Special Education in Content Area Classes , 1993 .

[29]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Metacognitive Strategy Instruction , 1986 .

[30]  Deborah L. Butler,et al.  The Roles of Goal Setting and Self-Monitoring in Students' Self-Regulated Engagement in Tasks. , 1997 .

[31]  E. Shapiro,et al.  Behavior Change in the Classroom: Self-Management Interventions , 1994 .

[32]  R. Reid,et al.  Research in Self-Monitoring with Students with Learning Disabilities: The Present, the Prospects, the Pitfalls , 1996, Journal of learning disabilities.

[33]  C. Sjostrom,et al.  Teaching High School Students to Identify Main Ideas in Expository Text , 1984 .

[34]  Steve Graham,et al.  Developing Self-Regulated Learners. , 1992 .

[35]  L. Anderson-Inman.  Bridging the Gap: Student-Centered Strategies for Promoting the Transfer of Learning , 1986, Exceptional children.

[36]  J. Carlisle.  Free Recall as a Test of Reading Comprehension for Students with Learning Disabilities , 1999 .

[37]  B. Wong,et al.  Comparing Two Modes of Teaching a Question-Answering Strategy for Enhancing Reading Comprehension , 1993, Journal of learning disabilities.