Biogeosciences A framework for benchmarking land models

Land models, which have been developed by the modeling community in the past few decades to predict future states of ecosystems and climate, have to be critically evaluated for their performance skills of simulating ecosystem responses and feedback to climate change. Benchmarking is an emerging procedure to measure performance of models against a set of defined standards. This paper proposes a benchmarking framework for evaluation of land model performances and, meanwhile, highlights major challenges at this infant stage of benchmark analysis. The framework includes (1) targeted aspects of model performance to be evaluated, (2) a set of benchmarks as defined references to test model performance, (3) metrics to measure and compare performance skills among models so as to identify model strengths and deficiencies, and (4) model improvement. Land models are required to simulate exchange of water, energy, carbon and sometimes other trace gases between the atmosphere and land surface, and should be evaluated for their simulations of biophysical processes, biogeochemical cycles, and vegetation dynamics in response to climate change across broad temporal and spatial scales. Thus, one major challenge is to select and define a limited number of Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 3858 Y. Q. Luo et al.: A framework for benchmarking land models benchmarks to effectively evaluate land model performance. The second challenge is to develop metrics of measuring mismatches between models and benchmarks. The metrics may include (1) a priori thresholds of acceptable model performance and (2) a scoring system to combine data–model mismatches for various processes at different temporal and spatial scales. The benchmark analyses should identify clues of weak model performance to guide future development, thus enabling improved predictions of future states of ecosystems and climate. The near-future research effort should be on development of a set of widely acceptable benchmarks that can be used to objectively, effectively, and reliably evaluate fundamental properties of land models to improve their prediction performance skills.

[1]  Wilfred M. Post,et al.  Soil carbon pools and world life zones , 1982, Nature.

[2]  J. S. Olson,et al.  Worldwide organic soil carbon and nitrogen data , 1986 .

[3]  K. Rose,et al.  Model goodness-of-fit analysis using regression and related techniques , 1995 .

[4]  Edward J. Rykiel,et al.  Testing ecological models: the meaning of validation , 1996 .

[5]  E. Matthews Global litter production, pools, and turnover times: Estimates from measurement data and regression models , 1997 .

[6]  T. Carlson,et al.  On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index , 1997 .

[7]  R. Dickinson,et al.  The Project for Intercomparison of Land Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS): Phases 2 and 3 , 1993 .

[8]  Anjan K. Ghosh,et al.  Performance Analysis of Acousto-optic Digital Signal Processors using the Describing Function Approach , 1998 .

[9]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Evaluation of terrestrial carbon cycle models through simulations of the seasonal cycle of atmospheric CO2: First results of a model intercomparison study , 1998 .

[10]  D. Jolly,et al.  Mid‐Holocene and glacial‐maximum vegetation geography of the northern continents and Africa , 2000 .

[11]  Peter A. Coppin,et al.  Parameter estimation in surface exchange models using nonlinear inversion: how many parameters can we estimate and which measurements are most useful? , 2001 .

[12]  K. Taylor Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram , 2001 .

[13]  Yiqi Luo,et al.  FIRE EFFECTS ON NITROGEN POOLS AND DYNAMICS IN TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS: A META-ANALYSIS , 2001 .

[14]  J. E. Braun,et al.  EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF , 2001 .

[15]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Carbon balance of the terrestrial biosphere in the Twentieth Century: Analyses of CO2, climate and land use effects with four process‐based ecosystem models , 2001 .

[16]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Evaluation of terrestrial carbon cycle models with atmospheric CO2 measurements: Results from transient simulations considering increasing CO2, climate, and land‐use effects , 2002 .

[17]  George H. Bryan,et al.  A Benchmark Simulation for Moist Nonhydrostatic Numerical Models , 2002 .

[18]  Damian J. Barrett,et al.  Estimating regional terrestrial carbon fluxes for the Australian continent using a multiple-constraint approach I. Using remotely sensed data and ecological observations of net primary production , 2003 .

[19]  Josep G. Canadell,et al.  Sustainability of terrestrial carbon sequestration: A case study in Duke Forest with inversion approach , 2003 .

[20]  R. Dickinson,et al.  The Common Land Model , 2003 .

[21]  Tooraj Jamasb,et al.  International benchmarking and regulation: an application to European electricity distribution utilities , 2003 .

[22]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Nitrogen and Climate Change , 2003, Science.

[23]  A. Pitman The evolution of, and revolution in, land surface schemes designed for climate models , 2003 .

[24]  M. R. Shaw,et al.  Water relations in grassland and desert ecosystems exposed to elevated atmospheric CO2 , 2004, Oecologia.

[25]  J. Randerson,et al.  Continental-Scale Partitioning of Fire Emissions During the 1997 to 2001 El Niño/La Niña Period , 2003, Science.

[26]  J. Berry,et al.  A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species , 1980, Planta.

[27]  M. R. R A U Pa C H,et al.  Model – data synthesis in terrestrial carbon observation : methods , data requirements and data uncertainty specifications , 2005 .

[28]  Steven Platnick,et al.  Spatially complete global spectral surface albedos: value-added datasets derived from Terra MODIS land products , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[29]  William G. Lee,et al.  Modulation of leaf economic traits and trait relationships by climate , 2005 .

[30]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Robert Jacob,et al.  Simulated and Observed Preindustrial to Modern Vegetation and Climate Changes , 2005 .

[32]  John S. Kimball,et al.  Global Biomass Variation and Its Geodynamic Effects: 1982–98 , 2005 .

[33]  R. Schnur,et al.  Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C , 2006 .

[34]  Gabriel Abramowitz,et al.  Towards a benchmark for land surface models , 2005 .

[35]  J. Chambers,et al.  Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests , 2005, Oecologia.

[36]  R. Norby,et al.  Nitrogen uptake, distribution, turnover, and efficiency of use in a CO2-enriched sweetgum forest. , 2006, Ecology.

[37]  Hans D. Mittelmann,et al.  A server for automated performance analysis of benchmarking data , 2006, Optim. Methods Softw..

[38]  S. Malyshev,et al.  The underpinnings of land‐use history: three centuries of global gridded land‐use transitions, wood‐harvest activity, and resulting secondary lands , 2006 .

[39]  Vivek K. Arora,et al.  Estimating changes in global vegetation cover (1850–2100) for use in climate models , 2006 .

[40]  Kuolin Hsu,et al.  Neural Error Regression Diagnosis (NERD): A Tool for Model Bias Identification and Prognostic Data Assimilation , 2006 .

[41]  J. Randerson,et al.  Interannual variability in global biomass burning emissions from 1997 to 2004 , 2006 .

[42]  Iain H. Woodhouse,et al.  Predicting backscatter-biomass and height-biomass trends using a macroecology model , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[43]  L. White,et al.  Probabilistic inversion of a terrestrial ecosystem model: Analysis of uncertainty in parameter estimation and model prediction , 2006 .

[44]  Yiqi Luo,et al.  Elevated CO2 stimulates net accumulations of carbon and nitrogen in land ecosystems: a meta-analysis. , 2006, Ecology.

[45]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Systematic Bias in Land Surface Models , 2007 .

[46]  Yiqi Luo,et al.  Divergence of reproductive phenology under climate warming , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Yiqi Luo Terrestrial Carbon-Cycle Feedback to Climate Warming , 2007 .

[48]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Development of a global evapotranspiration algorithm based on MODIS and global meteorology data , 2007 .

[49]  S. Roxburgh,et al.  OptIC project: An intercomparison of optimization techniques for parameter estimation in terrestrial biogeochemical models , 2007 .

[50]  Peter B Reich,et al.  Predicting leaf physiology from simple plant and climate attributes: a global GLOPNET analysis. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[51]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Influence of carbon‐nitrogen cycle coupling on land model response to CO2 fertilization and climate variability , 2007 .

[52]  J. V. Soares,et al.  Distribution of aboveground live biomass in the Amazon basin , 2007 .

[53]  Yiqi Luo,et al.  Spatial patterns of ecosystem carbon residence time and NPP‐driven carbon uptake in the conterminous United States , 2008 .

[54]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Consequences of More Extreme Precipitation Regimes for Terrestrial Ecosystems , 2008 .

[55]  S. Frolking,et al.  Canopy nitrogen, carbon assimilation, and albedo in temperate and boreal forests: Functional relations and potential climate feedbacks , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  W. Kurz,et al.  Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change , 2008, Nature.

[57]  Werner A. Kurz,et al.  Risk of natural disturbances makes future contribution of Canada's forests to the global carbon cycle highly uncertain , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  Steven Platnick,et al.  MODIS-Derived Spatially Complete Surface Albedo Products: Spatial and Temporal Pixel Distribution and Zonal Averages , 2008 .

[59]  Yiqi Luo,et al.  inor stimulation of soil carbon storage by nitrogen addition : A meta-analysis , 2011 .

[60]  Q. Zhuang,et al.  Equifinality in parameterization of process‐based biogeochemistry models: A significant uncertainty source to the estimation of regional carbon dynamics , 2008 .

[61]  R. Jeu,et al.  Multisensor historical climatology of satellite‐derived global land surface moisture , 2008 .

[62]  A. Pitman,et al.  Evaluating the Performance of Land Surface Models , 2008 .

[63]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Evaluation of the terrestrial carbon cycle, future plant geography and climate‐carbon cycle feedbacks using five Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs) , 2008 .

[64]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Global estimates of the land–atmosphere water flux based on monthly AVHRR and ISLSCP-II data, validated at 16 FLUXNET sites , 2008 .

[65]  S. Sitch,et al.  The role of fire disturbance for global vegetation dynamics: coupling fire into a Dynamic Global Vegetation Model , 2008 .

[66]  Ian G. Enting,et al.  A review of applications of model–data fusion to studies of terrestrial carbon fluxes at different scales , 2009 .

[67]  Li Zhang,et al.  Parameter identifiability, constraint, and equifinality in data assimilation with ecosystem models. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[68]  J. Canadell,et al.  Soil organic carbon pools in the northern circumpolar permafrost region , 2009 .

[69]  J. Randerson,et al.  Assessing variability and long-term trends in burned area by merging multiple satellite fire products , 2009 .

[70]  J. Randerson,et al.  Nitrogen deposition in tropical forests from savanna and deforestation fires , 2010 .

[71]  Rachel M. Law,et al.  A global model of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles for the terrestrial biosphere , 2009 .

[72]  W. Knorr,et al.  Quantifying photosynthetic capacity and its relationship to leaf nitrogen content for global‐scale terrestrial biosphere models , 2009 .

[73]  J. Randerson,et al.  Systematic assessment of terrestrial biogeochemistry in coupled climate–carbon models , 2009 .

[74]  Benjamin Z. Houlton,et al.  Nitrogen constraints on terrestrial carbon uptake: Implications for the global carbon‐climate feedback , 2009 .

[75]  Taotao Qian,et al.  Changes in Continental Freshwater Discharge from 1948 to 2004 , 2009 .

[76]  Tyler A. Simon,et al.  Observation and analysis of the multicore performance impact on scientific applications , 2009, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[77]  Jesse E. Bell,et al.  Changes in soil water dynamics due to variation in precipitation and temperature: An ecohydrological analysis in a tallgrass prairie , 2010 .

[78]  Eleanor Blyth,et al.  Evaluating the JULES Land Surface Model Energy Fluxes Using FLUXNET Data , 2010 .

[79]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Reduction of forest soil respiration in response to nitrogen deposition , 2010 .

[80]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited moisture supply , 2010, Nature.

[81]  S. Los,et al.  A comprehensive set of benchmark tests for a land surface model of simultaneous fluxes of water and carbon at both the global and seasonal scale , 2010 .

[82]  Sandy P. Harrison,et al.  The influence of vegetation, fire spread and fire behaviour on biomass burning and trace gas emissions: results from a process-based model , 2010 .

[83]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  Terrestrial nitrogen feedbacks may accelerate future climate change , 2010 .

[84]  Nuno Carvalhais,et al.  Comparing observations and process‐based simulations of biosphere‐atmosphere exchanges on multiple timescales , 2010 .

[85]  James S. Clark,et al.  Coordinated approaches to quantify long‐term ecosystem dynamics in response to global change , 2011 .

[86]  Andrew D. Friend,et al.  Carbon and nitrogen cycle dynamics in the O‐CN land surface model: 1. Model description, site‐scale evaluation, and sensitivity to parameter estimates , 2010 .

[87]  Lingli Liu,et al.  A global perspective on belowground carbon dynamics under nitrogen enrichment. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[88]  P. Ciais,et al.  Benchmarking coupled climate‐carbon models against long‐term atmospheric CO2 measurements , 2010 .

[89]  Nuno Carvalhais,et al.  Identification of vegetation and soil carbon pools out of equilibrium in a process model via eddy covariance and biometric constraints , 2010 .

[90]  B. P. Bond-Lamberty,et al.  A Global Database of Soil Respiration Data, Version 1.0 , 2010 .

[91]  T. A. Black,et al.  A model‐data intercomparison of CO2 exchange across North America: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis , 2010 .

[92]  J. Randerson,et al.  Technical Description of version 4.0 of the Community Land Model (CLM) , 2010 .

[93]  Jeffrey M. Warren,et al.  CO2 enhancement of forest productivity constrained by limited nitrogen availability , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[94]  Charles D. Canham,et al.  Increased tree carbon storage in response to nitrogen deposition in the US , 2010 .

[95]  M. Lefsky A global forest canopy height map from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer and the Geoscience Laser Altimeter System , 2010 .

[96]  Gordon B. Bonan,et al.  Quantifying carbon‐nitrogen feedbacks in the Community Land Model (CLM4) , 2010 .

[97]  Ray Leuning,et al.  Diagnosing errors in a land surface model (CABLE) in the time and frequency domains , 2011 .

[98]  Zhiqiang Xiao,et al.  Reprocessing the MODIS Leaf Area Index products for land surface and climate modelling , 2011 .

[99]  Hong Jiang,et al.  Integrating models with data in ecology and palaeoecology: advances towards a model-data fusion approach. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[100]  P. Friedlingstein,et al.  Modeling fire and the terrestrial carbon balance , 2011 .

[101]  Donald R. Zak,et al.  Ecological Lessons from Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) Experiments , 2011 .

[102]  Yiqi Luo,et al.  Carbon and nitrogen dynamics during forest stand development: a global synthesis. , 2011, The New phytologist.

[103]  Fabienne Maignan,et al.  Evaluation of a Global Vegetation Model using time series of satellite vegetation indices , 2011 .

[104]  A. Baccini,et al.  Mapping forest canopy height globally with spaceborne lidar , 2011 .

[105]  A. Robock,et al.  The International Soil Moisture Network: a data hosting facility for global in situ soil moisture measurements , 2011 .

[106]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Improving canopy processes in the Community Land Model version 4 (CLM4) using global flux fields empirically inferred from FLUXNET data , 2011 .

[107]  W. J. Riley,et al.  Barriers to predicting changes in global terrestrial methane fluxes: analyses using CLM4Me, a methane biogeochemistry model integrated in CESM , 2011 .

[108]  Yiqi Luo,et al.  Relative information contributions of model vs. data to short- and long-term forecasts of forest carbon dynamics. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[109]  J. Randerson,et al.  Continental-scale net radiation and evapotranspiration estimated using MODIS satellite observations , 2011 .

[110]  P. Ciais,et al.  Changes in satellite‐derived vegetation growth trend in temperate and boreal Eurasia from 1982 to 2006 , 2011 .

[111]  K. Denman,et al.  Carbon emission limits required to satisfy future representative concentration pathways of greenhouse gases , 2011 .

[112]  Shenfeng Fei,et al.  Ecological forecasting and data assimilation in a data-rich era. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[113]  Bo Li,et al.  Responses of ecosystem nitrogen cycle to nitrogen addition: a meta-analysis. , 2011, The New phytologist.

[114]  Yiqi Luo,et al.  Dynamic disequilibrium of the terrestrial carbon cycle under global change. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[115]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  New global observations of the terrestrial carbon cycle from GOSAT: Patterns of plant fluorescence with gross primary productivity , 2011, Geophysical Research Letters.

[116]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm , 2011 .

[117]  A. Arneth,et al.  Global patterns of land-atmosphere fluxes of carbon dioxide, latent heat, and sensible heat derived from eddy covariance, satellite, and meteorological observations , 2011 .

[118]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  Global estimates of evapotranspiration for climate studies using multi-sensor remote sensing data: Evaluation of three process-based approaches , 2011 .

[119]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Ecosystem carbon storage capacity as affected by disturbance regimes: A general theoretical model , 2012 .

[120]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  A framework for benchmarking land models , 2012 .

[121]  Jianyang Xia,et al.  Traceable components of terrestrial carbon storage capacity in biogeochemical models , 2013, Global change biology.

[122]  Gordon B. Bonan,et al.  Benefits of Forests Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate , 2014 .

[123]  S S I T C H,et al.  Evaluation of Ecosystem Dynamics, Plant Geography and Terrestrial Carbon Cycling in the Lpj Dynamic Global Vegetation Model , 2022 .