Reductions of greenhouse gas emissions in Annex I and non-Annex I countries for meeting concentration stabilisation targets

[1]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Do recent emission trends imply higher emissions forever? , 2008 .

[2]  D. Vuuren,et al.  Regional abatement action and costs under allocation schemes for emission allowances for achieving low CO2-equivalent concentrations , 2008 .

[3]  G. Timilsina.  Atmospheric stabilization of CO2 emissions: Near-term reductions and absolute versus intensity-based targets , 2008 .

[4]  Peter Sheehan,et al.  The new global growth path: implications for climate change analysis and policy , 2008 .

[5]  N. Höhne.  What Is Next after the Kyoto Protocol?: Assessment of Options for International Climate Policy Post 2012 , 2008 .

[6]  N. Höhne,et al.  The Triptych approach revisited: A staged sectoral approach for climate mitigation , 2008 .

[7]  Michel G.J. den Elzen,et al.  Multi-gas emission envelopes to meet greenhouse gas concentration targets: Costs versus certainty of limiting temperature increase , 2007 .

[8]  H. Winkler,et al.  Differentiation of countries’ future commitments in a post-2012 climate regime: An assessment of the “South–North Dialogue” Proposal , 2007 .

[9]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: an assessment of reduction strategies and costs , 2007 .

[10]  Axel Michaelowa,et al.  Policies, Instruments and Cooperative Arrangements , 2007 .

[11]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective , 2007 .

[12]  P. Baer,et al.  The Right to Development in a Climate Constrained World: The Greenhouse Development Rights Framework , 2007 .

[13]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Issues related to mitigation in the long-term context , 2007 .

[14]  Kristian Lindgren,et al.  Allocation of CO2 emission permits - economic incentives for emission reductions in developing countries. , 2006 .

[15]  H. Welsch,et al.  Burden sharing in a greenhouse: egalitarianism and sovereignty reconciled , 2006 .

[16]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  Long-Term Multi-Gas Scenarios to Stabilise Radiative Forcing - Exploring Costs and Benefits Within an Integrated Assessment Framework , 2006 .

[17]  Michel G.J. den Elzen,et al.  Multi-gas Emissions Pathways to Meet Climate Targets , 2006 .

[18]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Avoiding dangerous climate change , 2006 .

[19]  P. Lucas,et al.  Multi-Stage: A Rule-Based Evolution of Future Commitments under the Climate Change Convention , 2006 .

[20]  Malte Meinshausen,et al.  Meeting the EU 2°C climate target: global and regional emission implications , 2006 .

[21]  J. Waaub,et al.  A decision aid tool for equity issues analysis in emission permit allocations , 2006 .

[22]  N. Höhne,et al.  Common but differentiated convergence (CDC): a new conceptual approach to long-term climate policy , 2006 .

[23]  Jason Lowe,et al.  Analysing countries' contribution to climate change: scientific and policy-related choices , 2005 .

[24]  Michel G.J. den Elzen,et al.  Abatement costs of post-Kyoto climate regimes , 2005 .

[25]  Andreas Löschel,et al.  Climate Policy Beyond Kyoto: Quo Vadis? A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis Based on Expert Judgments , 2005 .

[26]  Paul L. Lucas,et al.  The FAIR model: A tool to analyse environmental and costs implications of regimes of future commitments , 2005 .

[27]  A. Michaelowa,et al.  Graduation and Deepening: An Ambitious Post-2012 Climate Policy Scenario , 2005 .

[28]  Bollen Jc,et al.  How much does a 30% emissionreduction cost?Macroeconomic effects of post-Kyoto climate policy in 2020 , 2004 .

[29]  H. Groenenberg,et al.  Global Triptych: a bottom-up approach for the differentiation of commitments under the Climate Convention , 2004 .

[30]  Hermann E. Ott,et al.  South-North dialogue on equity in the greenhouse. A proposal for an adequate and equitable global climate agreement , 2004 .

[31]  Vuuren Dp van,et al.  Regional costs and benefits of alternative post-Kyoto climate regimes Comparison of variants of the Multi-stage and Per Capita Convergence regimes , 2003 .

[32]  Alban Kitous,et al.  Greenhouse gas reduction pathways in the UNFCCC process up to 2025 : policymakers summary and technical report , 2003 .

[33]  Marian Leimbach,et al.  Equity and carbon emissions trading: a model analysis , 2003 .

[34]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Model Runs with MESSAGE in the Context of the Further Development of the Kyoto-Protocol , 2003 .

[35]  M. Elzen,et al.  Exploring Climate Regimes for Differentiation of Future Commitments to Stabilise Greenhouse Gas Concentrations , 2002 .

[36]  Odile Blanchard.  Scenarios for differentiating commitments , 2002 .

[37]  Michiel Schaeffer,et al.  Responsibility for Past and Future Global Warming: Uncertainties in Attributing Anthropogenic Climate Change , 2002 .

[38]  H. Winkler,et al.  Comparing developing countries under potential carbon allocation schemes , 2002 .

[39]  Richard Betts,et al.  The science of climate change , 2010 .

[40]  M. D. den Elzen,et al.  Options for differentiation of future commitments in climate policy: how to realise timely participation to meet stringent climate goals? , 2001 .

[41]  D. Dokken,et al.  Climate change 2001 , 2001 .

[42]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Special report on emissions scenarios , 2000 .

[43]  Aie.  World Energy Outlook 2009 , 2000 .

[44]  A. Meyer.  Contraction & Convergence: The Global Solution to Climate Change , 2000 .

[45]  I. Wing,et al.  Toward a useful architecture for climate change negotiations , 1999 .

[46]  K. Baumert,et al.  What might a developing country climate commitment look like , 1999 .

[47]  Kornelis Blok,et al.  A Triptych sectoral approach to burden differentiation; GHG emissions in the European bubble , 1998 .

[48]  Robert M. May.  Kyoto and Beyond , 1997, Science.

[49]  Judith Gurney.  BP Statistical Review of World Energy , 1985 .

[50]  M. Thring.  World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[51]  C. Brooks.  Climatic Change , 1913, Nature.