Geometry of the proximal humerus and implications for prosthetic design.

The purpose of this study was to add critical information to the data already available on anthropometry of the proximal humerus. Two hundred macerated humeri were examined. Measurements were taken either directly on the bones or on standardized radiographic projections. The methodology was validated and showed a mean interobserver correlation of 0.94 +/- 0.067. Results were expressed in mean values, first SD, and minimum and maximum values, as well as the 10th and 90th percentiles. The frontal radius of the head ranged between 21 and 26.5 mm (10th respectively 90th percentile). The frontal diameter of the base of the head ranged between 39.4 and 50 mm. The head height ranged between 14.4 and 18.8 mm. The frontal radius-head height ratio ranged between 0.64 and 0.77. The inclination of the head ranged between 132 degrees and 142 degrees. The medial offset ranged between 3.9 and 8.6 mm. The posterior offset ranged between -0.4 and 3.2 mm. The greater tuberosity offset (distance between the axis of the proximal humerus and the most medial insertion point of the supraspinatus tendon) ranged between 2.5 and 9.2 mm. Retrotorsion ranged between 7 degrees and 38.5 degrees. The distance from the bicipital groove to the head equator ranged between 6 and 10.5 mm. The anatomy of the proximal humerus showed a wide range for variables such as the medial offset and the greater tuberosity offset but was surprisingly constant for the inclination and relative dimensions of the head. The implications for prosthetic design are as follows: stem design and insertion should respect the insertion facet of the supraspinatus, a constant head inclination is an adequate approximation, only one head height per radius is required, and the capability for adjustment of medial offset is mandatory.

[1]  R. Richards,et al.  Shoulder arthrodesis with plate fixation: Functional outcome analysis. , 1993, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[2]  M. Kronberg,et al.  Retroversion of the humeral head in the normal shoulder and its relationship to the normal range of motion. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  J. Iannotti,et al.  The normal glenohumeral relationships. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  F. Kummer,et al.  The use of the bicipital groove for alignment of the humeral stem in shoulder arthroplasty. , 1998, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[5]  S N Roberts,et al.  The geometry of the humeral head and the design of prostheses. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  I. Clarke,et al.  Problems in Gieno-Humeral Surface Replacements—Real or Imagined? , 1979 .

[7]  J. Sidles,et al.  Humeral head prosthetic arthroplasty: Surgically relevant geometric considerations. , 1993, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[8]  M. Pearl,et al.  Geometric analysis of commonly used prosthetic systems for proximal humeral replacement. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  M. Pearl,et al.  Retroversion of the proximal humerus in relationship to prosthetic replacement arthroplasty. , 1995, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[10]  R. Burks,et al.  Comparison of humeral head retroversion with the humeral axis/biceps groove relationship: a study in live subjects and cadavers. , 1998, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[11]  E. Tillett,et al.  Anatomic determination of humeral head retroversion: The relationship of the central axis of the humeral head to the bicipital groove. , 1993, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[12]  J. Iannotti,et al.  Limits imposed on glenohumeral motion by joint geometry. , 1995, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[13]  Gilles Walch,et al.  The Three-Dimensional Geometry of the Proximal Humerus: Implications for Surgical Technique and Prosthetic Design , 1997 .

[14]  P Boileau,et al.  The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus. Implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[15]  G. Edelson Variations in the retroversion of the humeral head. , 1999, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[16]  M. Pearl,et al.  Coronal plane geometry of the proximal humerus relevant to prosthetic arthroplasty. , 1996, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[17]  R. L. Dooley,et al.  Anthropometric study of normal glenohumeral relationships. , 1997, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.