How Ineffective Interprofessional Collaboration Affects Delivery of Breast Reconstruction to Breast Cancer Patients: A Qualitative Study

[1]  Jacqueline A. ter Stege,et al.  The impact of an online patient decision aid for women with breast cancer considering immediate breast reconstruction: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial , 2019, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[2]  B. Strøm,et al.  Interprofessional work in early detection of breast cancer: An integrative review. , 2019, Radiography.

[3]  H. Retrouvey,et al.  Barriers of Access to Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review , 2019, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  F. Schellevis,et al.  The availability and effectiveness of tools supporting shared decision making in metastatic breast cancer care: a review , 2018, BMC Palliative Care.

[5]  Hester F. Lingsma,et al.  Patient reported outcome measures in breast cancer patients. , 2018, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[6]  C. Collins,et al.  The Central Role of Theory in Qualitative Research , 2018, International Journal of Qualitative Methods.

[7]  M. Politi,et al.  Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Recognizing Ways to Improve Shared Decision Making , 2017, Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open.

[8]  Alex Clarke,et al.  A study protocol of the effectiveness of PEGASUS: a multi-centred study comparing an intervention to promote shared decision making about breast reconstruction with treatment as usual , 2017, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[9]  Deborah E. White,et al.  Thematic Analysis , 2017 .

[10]  J. Sim,et al.  Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization , 2017, Quality & Quantity.

[11]  Scott Reeves,et al.  Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[12]  B. Egleston,et al.  Patterns of multidisciplinary care in the management of non-metastatic invasive breast cancer in the United States Medicare patient , 2016, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[13]  B. Fosh,et al.  Quality of life following total mastectomy with and without reconstruction versus breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer: A case-controlled cohort study. , 2016, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[14]  A. Beurskens,et al.  Interprofessional collaboration regarding patients’ care plans in primary care: a focus group study into influential factors , 2016, BMC Family Practice.

[15]  Karen Colorafi,et al.  Qualitative Descriptive Methods in Health Science Research , 2016, HERD.

[16]  D. Schmauss,et al.  Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy , 2016, Front. Surg..

[17]  Lawrence R. Ness,et al.  Are We There Yet - Data Saturation in Qualitative Research (TQR Published).pdf , 2015 .

[18]  M. Untch,et al.  Breast Reconstruction Following Cancer Treatment. , 2015, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[19]  Z. Austin,et al.  Qualitative Research: Data Collection, Analysis, and Management. , 2015, The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy.

[20]  D. Noh,et al.  Effect of cosmetic outcome on quality of life after breast cancer surgery. , 2015, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[21]  A. Abernethy,et al.  A National Snapshot of Satisfaction with Breast Cancer Procedures , 2015, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[22]  E. Szumacher,et al.  Breast and Prostate Cancer Patient Perspectives and Perceptions of Interprofessional Collaboration during Cancer Treatment: A Pilot Study. , 2014, Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences.

[23]  R. Saskin,et al.  Barriers to immediate breast reconstruction in the Canadian universal health care system. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  D. Winchester,et al.  Surgical leadership and standardization of multidisciplinary breast cancer care: the evolution of the National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers. , 2014, Surgical oncology clinics of North America.

[25]  R. Kahlke.  Generic Qualitative Approaches: Pitfalls and Benefits of Methodological Mixology , 2014 .

[26]  A. Alharbi,et al.  The attitude and perception of breast reconstruction by general surgeons in Saudi Arabia , 2013, Annals of Saudi medicine.

[27]  J. S. Smith,et al.  Shared Decision Making in Breast Cancer: National Practice Patterns of Surgeons , 2013, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[28]  S. Cawthorn,et al.  Exploring inequalities in access to care and the provision of choice to women seeking breast reconstruction surgery: a qualitative study , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.

[29]  David S Morrison,et al.  Effects of multidisciplinary team working on breast cancer survival: retrospective, comparative, interventional cohort study of 13 722 women , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[30]  U. Gunnarsson,et al.  Role of the multidisciplinary team in breast cancer management: results from a large international survey involving 39 countries. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[31]  C. McCarthy,et al.  Patient satisfaction and health‐related quality of life after autologous tissue breast reconstruction , 2012, Cancer.

[32]  D. Fleiszer,et al.  Developing an interprofessional care plan for an older adult woman with breast cancer: from multiple voices to a shared vision. , 2012, Clinical journal of oncology nursing.

[33]  F. Wright,et al.  How can we improve cancer care? A review of interprofessional collaboration models and their use in clinical management. , 2011, Surgical oncology.

[34]  Stuart James,et al.  Mastectomy and reconstruction in stage IV breast cancer: a survey of UK breast and plastic surgeons. , 2011, Breast.

[35]  Peggy Soule Odegard,et al.  Interprofessional collaboration: three best practice models of interprofessional education , 2011, Medical education online.

[36]  L. Petri.  Concept analysis of interdisciplinary collaboration. , 2010, Nursing forum.

[37]  Margarete Sandelowski,et al.  What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited. , 2010, Research in nursing & health.

[38]  A. Thind,et al.  Breast reconstructive surgery in medically underserved women with breast cancer , 2009, Cancer.

[39]  S. Reeves,et al.  Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[40]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[41]  N. Hansen,et al.  Multidisciplinary care for patients with breast cancer. , 2009, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[42]  S. Kirkland,et al.  Barriers to breast reconstruction after mastectomy in Nova Scotia. , 2008, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[43]  T. Zhong,et al.  Breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer , 2008, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[44]  P. Cordeiro,et al.  Breast reconstruction after surgery for breast cancer. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[45]  Leticia San Martín-Rodríguez,et al.  A model and typology of collaboration between professionals in healthcare organizations , 2008, BMC health services research.

[46]  Annika Lindblom,et al.  Psychological reactions, quality of life, and body image after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk for breast cancer: a prospective 1-year follow-up study. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[47]  S. Reeves,et al.  Why use theories in qualitative research? , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[48]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Do variations in provider discussions explain socioeconomic disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction? , 2008, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[49]  M. Morrow,et al.  Understanding the impact of breast reconstruction on the surgical decision‐making process for breast cancer , 2008, Cancer.

[50]  P. Sainsbury,et al.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[51]  S. Carter,et al.  Justifying Knowledge, Justifying Method, Taking Action: Epistemologies, Methodologies, and Methods in Qualitative Research , 2007, Qualitative health research.

[52]  K. Devers,et al.  Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. , 2007, Health services research.

[53]  M. Morrow,et al.  Conflicts in Decision-Making for Breast Cancer Surgery , 2007, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[54]  Susan Catt,et al.  Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK? , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.

[55]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[56]  A. Fagerlin,et al.  Correlates of breast reconstruction , 2005, Cancer.

[57]  M. Beaulieu,et al.  The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: Core concepts and theoretical frameworks , 2005, Journal of interprofessional care.

[58]  Amiram Gafni,et al.  Self‐reported use of shared decision‐making among breast cancer specialists and perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing this approach , 2004, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[59]  G. Robb,et al.  The effect of ethnicity on immediate reconstruction rates after mastectomy for breast cancer , 2004, Cancer.

[60]  B. Rabinowitz.  Interdisciplinary breast cancer care: declaring and improving the standard. , 2004, Oncology.

[61]  Martin J R Lee,et al.  Immediate breast reconstruction in the West Midlands: a survey of current practice. , 2003, British journal of plastic surgery.

[62]  K. Sandelin,et al.  Breast reconstruction following mastectomy: current status in Australia , 2003, ANZ journal of surgery.

[63]  L. Bronstein.  A model for interdisciplinary collaboration. , 2003, Social work.

[64]  J. Dawson,et al.  Breast cancer teams: the impact of constitution, new cancer workload, and methods of operation on their effectiveness , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[65]  L. Finlay.  Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice , 2002 .

[66]  R. Rainsbury,et al.  Breast reconstruction in the United Kingdom and Ireland , 2002, The British journal of surgery.

[67]  K. Malterud.  Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines , 2001, The Lancet.

[68]  R. Andersen,et al.  Changing the U.S. Health Care System: Key Issues in Health Services Policy and Management , 2001 .

[69]  M. Sandelowski.  Focus on Research Methods Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description? , 2022 .

[70]  P. Manson,et al.  Surgeon Perspectives on Surgical Options for Early-Stage Breast Cancer , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[71]  P. Manson,et al.  Surgical options for the early-stage breast cancer: factors associated with patient choice and postoperative quality of life. , 1999, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[72]  A Clarke,et al.  Qualitative research: data analysis techniques. , 1999, Professional nurse.

[73]  O. G. Titley,et al.  A survey of general surgeons' attitudes towards breast reconstruction after mastectomy. , 1998, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[74]  D Feldman-Stewart,et al.  Does a centralized radiotherapy system provide adequate access to care? , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[75]  R. Andersen.  Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? , 1995, Journal of health and social behavior.

[76]  Mark R Luborsky,et al.  Sampling in Qualitative Research , 1995, Research on aging.

[77]  L. Krefting.  Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. , 1991, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[78]  R. Penchansky,et al.  The Concept of Access: Definition and Relationship to Consumer Satisfaction , 1981, Medical care.

[79]  Seyyed-Abdolhamid Mirhosseini,et al.  Designing Qualitative Studies , 2020 .

[80]  E. Szumacher,et al.  Towards an optimal multidisciplinary approach to breast cancer treatment for older women. , 2015, Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique.

[81]  V. Braun,et al.  What can "thematic analysis" offer health and wellbeing researchers? , 2014, International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being.

[82]  L. Rose.  Interprofessional collaboration in the ICU: how to define? , 2011, Nursing in critical care.

[83]  M. Giacomini.  Theory Matters in Qualitative Health Research , 2010 .

[84]  K. Kahn,et al.  Variation in Physician-patient Discussion of Breast Reconstruction , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[85]  R. Andersen,et al.  Improving Access to Care in America: Individual and Contextual Indicators. , 2007 .

[86]  M. Morrow,et al.  Factors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: a National Cancer Database study. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[87]  M. Marshall.  Sampling for qualitative research. , 1996, Family practice.

[88]  R. Andersen,et al.  A framework for the study of access to medical care. , 1974, Health services research.