Cages in Tandem: Management Control, Social Identity, and Identification in a Knowledge-Intensive Firm

Developments in organization studies downplay the role of bureaucracy in favour of more flexible arrangements and forms of organizational control, including socio-ideological control. Corporate culture and regulated social identities are assumed to provide means for the integration and orchestration of work. Knowledge-intensive firms, which typically draw heavily upon socio-ideological modes of control, are often singled out as organizational forms that use social identity and the corporatization of the self as a mode for managerial control. In this article we explore and discuss social identity and identification in a large IT/management consultancy firm with a strong presence of socioideological or normative control, but also with strong bureaucratic features. Structural forms of control—formal HRM procedures and performance pressures are considered in relation to socio-ideological control. We identify organizational and individual consequences of identification in a context of social, structural, and cultural ‘closures’ and contradictions, including the tendency to create an ‘iron cage of subjectivity’.

[1]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation , 1991 .

[2]  C. Grey.  Career as a Project of the Self and Labour Process Discipline , 1994 .

[3]  D. Mumby.  Cultures in Organizations: Three Perspectives , 1994 .

[4]  L. Smircich,et al.  Leadership: The Management of Meaning , 1982, The Journal of applied behavioral science.

[5]  Tom Keenoy,et al.  Organizational Discourses: Text and Context , 1997 .

[6]  David Courpasson,et al.  Managerial Strategies of Domination. Power in Soft Bureaucracies , 2000 .

[7]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Varieties of Discourse: On the Study of Organizations through Discourse Analysis , 2000 .

[8]  H. Willmott,et al.  Power and Subjectivity at Work: From Degradation to Subjugation in Social Relations , 1989 .

[9]  Randall R. Steffan Mpa Che,et al.  Mintzberg on Management , 1997 .

[10]  Course Techonology.  Managerial leadership , 2002 .

[11]  M. Alvesson.  Organization: From Substance to Image? , 1990 .

[12]  Celia V. Harquail,et al.  Organizational images and member identification. , 1994 .

[13]  M. Pratt.  The Good, the Bad, and the Ambivalent: Managing Identification among Amway Distributors , 2000 .

[14]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual , 2002 .

[15]  W. Feinberg,et al.  On After Virtue , 1984 .

[16]  Ann Taket,et al.  Doing Critical Management Research , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[17]  G. Kunda.  Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation , 1993 .

[18]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations , 1983 .

[19]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts , 2000 .

[20]  Barbara Czarniawska.  Narrating the Organization: Dramas of Institutional Identity , 1997 .

[21]  C. Cherry.  Making Sense of Management , 2002 .

[22]  Robert Dingwall,et al.  Context and Method in Qualitative Research , 1997 .

[23]  Brian Rowan,et al.  INSTITUTIONALIZED ORGANIZATIONS: , 2022, The New Economic Sociology.

[24]  Barbara Czarniawska-Joerges,et al.  Narratives of Individual and Organizational Identities , 1994 .

[25]  C. Oswick,et al.  Introduction: Organizational Discourse: Of Diversity, Dichotomy and Multi-disciplinarity , 1998 .

[26]  M. Diamond.  Organizational Identity , 1988 .

[27]  Robert Dingwall,et al.  Accounts, interviews and observations , 1997 .

[28]  M. Pratt,et al.  Classifying Managerial Responses to Multiple Organizational Identities , 2000 .

[29]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Symbolism and Strategic Change in Academia: The Dynamics of Sensemaking and Influence , 1994 .

[30]  S. Frenkel.  Management of Knowledge-Intensive Companies , 1996 .

[31]  Barbara Czarniawska.  Ideological control in nonideological organizations , 1988 .

[32]  Mats Alvesson,et al.  Making Newsmakers: Conversational Identity at Work , 2001 .

[33]  T. Rickards.  Sense making in organizations , 1997 .

[34]  Charles J. Fombrun,et al.  Structural Dynamics Within and Between Organizations. , 1986 .

[35]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[36]  L. Christensen.  Buffering Organizational Identity in the Marketing Culture , 1995 .

[37]  David Knights,et al.  Power and Identity in Theory and Practice , 1985 .

[38]  V. Fournier.  Stories of Development and Exploitation: Militant Voices in an Enterprise Culture , 1998 .

[39]  S. Deetz.  Democracy in an age of corporate colonization : developments in communication and the politics of everyday life , 1992 .

[40]  J. Barker.  Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams , 1993 .

[41]  S. Barley,et al.  Bringing Work Back In , 2001 .

[42]  W. Ouchi.  A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms , 1979 .

[43]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 1989 .

[44]  Dennis K. Mumby,et al.  Communication and Power in Organizations: Discourse, Ideology, and Domination , 1990 .