Real-World Data on Cabozantinib in Previously Treated Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Focus on Sequences and Prognostic Factors

Cabozantinib is approved for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, prognostic factors are still lacking in this context. The aim of this study was to evaluate prognostic factors in RCC patients treated with second- or third-line cabozantinib. A multicenter retrospective real-world study was conducted, involving 32 worldwide centers. A total of 237 patients with histologically confirmed clear-cell and non-clear-cell RCC who received cabozantinib as second- or third-line therapy for metastatic disease were included. We analyzed overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and time-to-strategy failure (TTSF) using Kaplan–Meier curves. Cox proportional models were used at univariate and multivariate analyses.The median PFS and OS of cabozantinib were 7.76 months (95% CI 6.51–10.88) and 11.57 months (95% CI 10.90–not reached (NR)) as second-line and 11.38 months (95% CI 5.79–NR) and NR (95% CI 11.51–NR) as third-line therapy. The median TTSF and OS were 11.57 and 15.52 months with the sequence of cabozantinib–nivolumab and 25.64 months and NR with nivolumab–cabozantinib, respectively. The difference between these two sequences was statistically significant only in good-risk patients. In the second-line setting, hemoglobin (Hb) levels (HR= 2.39; 95% CI 1.24–4.60, p = 0.009) and IMDC (International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium) group (HR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.04–2.87, p = 0.037) were associated with PFS while ECOG-PS (HR = 2.33; 95%CI, 1.16–4.69, p = 0.018) and Hb levels (HR = 3.12; 95%CI 1.18–8.26, p = 0.023) correlated with OS at multivariate analysis, while in the third-line setting, only Hb levels (HR = 2.72; 95%CI 1.04–7.09, p = 0.042) were associated with OS. Results are limited by the retrospective nature of the study.This real-world study provides evidence on the presence of prognostic factors in RCC patients receiving cabozantinib.

[1]  T. Powles,et al.  Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal‐Cell Carcinoma , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  R. Motzer,et al.  Avelumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal‐Cell Carcinoma , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  R. Montironi,et al.  Tivozanib for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma , 2018, Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy.

[4]  Bohuslav Melichar,et al.  Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal‐Cell Carcinoma , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  T. Choueiri,et al.  Cabozantinib versus sunitinib as initial therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma of intermediate or poor risk (Alliance A031203 CABOSUN randomised trial): Progression-free survival by independent review and overall survival update , 2018, European journal of cancer.

[6]  R. Nolley,et al.  Cabozantinib inhibits tumor growth and metastasis of a patient-derived xenograft model of papillary renal cell carcinoma with MET mutation , 2017, Cancer biology & therapy.

[7]  F. Massari,et al.  The role of the MET/AXL pathway as a new target for multikinase inhibitors in renal cell carcinoma , 2017 .

[8]  S. Buti,et al.  Is Cabozantinib Really Better Than Sunitinib As First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma? , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  T. Choueiri,et al.  Cabozantinib Versus Sunitinib As Initial Targeted Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma of Poor or Intermediate Risk: The Alliance A031203 CABOSUN Trial. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  T. Powles,et al.  Cabozantinib versus everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma (METEOR): final results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[11]  A. Ravaud,et al.  Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  P. Kantoff,et al.  Cabozantinib versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  C. Porta,et al.  Final results from the large sunitinib global expanded-access trial in metastatic renal cell carcinoma , 2015, British Journal of Cancer.

[14]  A. Sytkowski,et al.  Erythropoietin and Cancer: The Unintended Consequences of Anemia Correction , 2014, Front. Immunol..

[15]  R. Motzer,et al.  Tivozanib versus sorafenib as initial targeted therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results from a phase III trial. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  J. Reeves,et al.  Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  R. Motzer,et al.  Axitinib versus sorafenib as second-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: overall survival analysis and updated results from a randomised phase 3 trial. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[18]  Bohuslav Melichar,et al.  Bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, double-blind phase III trial , 2007, The Lancet.

[19]  R. Figlin,et al.  Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Apurva A Desai,et al.  Sorafenib in advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2018 , 2018, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[22]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.