Analysis of short-term ozone and PM2.5 measurements: Characteristics and relationships for air sensor messaging

ABSTRACT Air quality sensors are becoming increasingly available to the general public, providing individuals and communities with information on fine-scale, local air quality in increments as short as 1 min. Current health studies do not support linking 1-min exposures to adverse health effects; therefore, the potential health implications of such ambient exposures are unclear. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) establishes the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and Air Quality Index (AQI) on the best science available, which typically uses longer averaging periods (e.g., 8 hr; 24 hr). Another consideration for interpreting sensor data is the variable relationship between pollutant concentrations measured by sensors, which are short-term (1 min to 1 hr), and the longer term averages used in the NAAQS and AQI. In addition, sensors often do not meet federal performance or quality assurance requirements, which introduces uncertainty in the accuracy and interpretation of these readings. This article describes a statistical analysis of data from regulatory monitors and new real-time technology from Village Green benches to inform the interpretation and communication of short-term air sensor data. We investigate the characteristics of this novel data set and the temporal relationships of short-term concentrations to 8-hr average (ozone) and 24-hr average (PM2.5) concentrations to examine how sensor readings may relate to the NAAQS and AQI categories, and ultimately to inform breakpoints for sensor messages. We consider the empirical distributions of the maximum 8-hr averages (ozone) and 24-hr averages (PM2.5) given the corresponding short-term concentrations, and provide a probabilistic assessment. The result is a robust, empirical comparison that includes events of interest for air quality exceedances and public health communication. Concentration breakpoints are developed for short-term sensor readings such that, to the extent possible, the related air quality messages that are conveyed to the public are consistent with messages related to the NAAQS and AQI. Implications: Real-time sensors have the potential to provide important information about fine-scale current air quality and local air quality events. The statistical analysis of short-term regulatory and sensor data, coupled with policy considerations and known health effects experienced over longer averaging times, supports interpretation of such short-term data and efforts to communicate local air quality.

[1]  Neil J. Zimmerman,et al.  A Multi-City Investigation of the Effectiveness of Retrofit Emissions Controls in Reducing Exposures to Particulate Matter in School Buses , 2005 .

[2]  P. Udani,et al.  Morbidity and mortality. , 1962, The Indian journal of child health.

[3]  R. Burnett,et al.  Cardiovascular impacts and micro-environmental exposure factors associated with continuous personal PM2.5 monitoring , 2014, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[4]  Brian J. Reich,et al.  Time-to-event analysis of fine particle air pollution and preterm birth: results from North Carolina, 2001-2005. , 2012, American journal of epidemiology.

[5]  R. Burnett,et al.  Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality. , 2009, Research report.

[6]  D. Dockery,et al.  Health Effects of Fine Particulate Air Pollution: Lines that Connect , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[7]  A. Goldstein,et al.  Using Indoor Air Quality Monitoring in 6 Counties to Change Policy in North Carolina , 2009, Preventing chronic disease.

[8]  Wan Jiao,et al.  Field assessment of the Village Green Project: an autonomous community air quality monitoring system. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  J. Schwartz,et al.  The Effect of Fine and Coarse Particulate Air Pollution on Mortality: A National Analysis , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.

[10]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Reduction in fine particulate air pollution and mortality: Extended follow-up of the Harvard Six Cities study. , 2006, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[11]  Joel Schwartz,et al.  REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF HEALTH EFFECTS OF PARTICULATE AIR POLLUTION , 1995 .

[12]  Kazuhiko Ito,et al.  Long-term ozone exposure and mortality. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Antonella Zanobetti,et al.  Air pollution and health: a European and North American approach (APHENA). , 2009, Research report.

[14]  F. Dominici,et al.  Seasonal and regional short-term effects of fine particles on hospital admissions in 202 US counties, 1999-2005. , 2008, American journal of epidemiology.

[15]  Indoor air quality at nine large-hub airports with and without designated smoking areas--United States, October-November 2012. , 2012, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[16]  Rebecca A. Efroymson,et al.  Analysis of Effects , 2000 .

[17]  Montserrat Fuentes,et al.  Analysis of the effects of ultrafine particulate matter while accounting for human exposure , 2009, Environmetrics.

[18]  Us Congress,et al.  Title 42 - The Public Health And Welfare , 2017 .