The cerebral representation of temporomandibular joint occlusion and its alternation by occlusal splints

Occlusal splints are a common and effective therapy for temporomandibular joint disorder. Latest hypotheses on the impact of occlusal splints suggest an altered cerebral control on the occlusion movements after using a splint. However, the impact of using a splint during chewing on its cerebral representation is quite unknown. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate brain activities during occlusal function in centric occlusion on natural teeth or on occlusal splints in fifteen healthy subjects. Comparisons between conditions revealed an increased activation for the bilateral occlusion without a splint in bilateral primary and secondary sensorimotor areas, the putamen, inferior parietal and prefrontal cortex (left dorsal and bilateral orbital) and anterior insular. In contrast, using a splint increased activation in the bilateral prefrontal lobe (bilateral BA 10), bilateral temporo‐parietal (BA 39), occipital and cerebellar hemispheres. An additionally applied individually based evaluation of representation sites in regions of interest demonstrated that the somatotopic representation for both conditions in the pre‐ and postcentral gyri did not significantly differ. Furthermore, this analysis confirmed the decreasing effect of the splint on bilateral primary and secondary motor and somatosensory cortical activation. In contrast to the decreasing effect on sensorimotor areas, an increased level of activity in the fronto‐parieto‐occipital and cerebellar network might be associated with the therapeutic effect of occlusal splints. Hum Brain Mapp, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  C. Sforza,et al.  Immediate Effect of the Resilient Splint Evaluated Using Surface Electromyography in Patients with TMD , 2010, Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice.

[2]  J. Handschel,et al.  A survey on German dentists regarding the management of craniomandibular disorders , 2010, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[3]  Yoshiyuki Hirano,et al.  Effects of Mandibular Deviation on Brain Activation During Clenching: An fMRI Preliminary Study , 2009, Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice.

[4]  Franco Lepore,et al.  Brain activity associated with the electrodermal reactivity to acute heat pain , 2009, NeuroImage.

[5]  S. Tecco,et al.  Surface electromyographic patterns of masticatory, neck, and trunk muscles in temporomandibular joint dysfunction patients undergoing anterior repositioning splint therapy. , 2008, European journal of orthodontics.

[6]  L. Gallo,et al.  Stereometric assessment of TMJ space variation by occlusal splints , 2008, BDJ.

[7]  Takayuki Obata,et al.  Effects of chewing in working memory processing , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[8]  Inge Zijdewind,et al.  Relation between muscle and brain activity during isometric contractions of the first dorsal interosseus muscle , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[9]  Andreas Gartus,et al.  Cortical lateralization of bilateral symmetric chin movements and clinical relevance in tumor patients—A high field BOLD–FMRI study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[10]  Beatriz Luna,et al.  Circuitry underlying temporally extended spatial working memory , 2007, NeuroImage.

[11]  Leonardo Fogassi,et al.  Motor functions of the parietal lobe , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[12]  E Honda,et al.  Chewing-side Preference is Involved in Differential Cortical Activation Patterns during Tongue Movements after Bilateral Gum-chewing: a Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2004, Journal of dental research.

[13]  D. Meier,et al.  Cortical Activation Resulting from Painless Vibrotactile Dental Stimulation Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) , 2004, Journal of dental research.

[14]  J. Türp,et al.  Efficacy of stabilization splints for the management of patients with masticatory muscle pain: a qualitative systematic review , 2004, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[15]  Tamaki Miyamoto,et al.  A fronto-parietal network for chewing of gum: a study on human subjects with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[16]  T. Kawasaki,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of human jaw movements. , 2003, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[17]  V. Ferrario,et al.  Immediate effect of a stabilization splint on masticatory muscle activity in temporomandibular disorder patients. , 2002, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[18]  B. Rosen,et al.  Motor cortex activation is related to force of squeezing , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[19]  A. Craig.  How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[21]  J. Callicott,et al.  Neurophysiological correlates of age-related changes in human motor function , 2002, Neurology.

[22]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Experience-dependent changes in cerebellar contributions to motor sequence learning , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  M. Erb,et al.  Sensorimotor mapping of the human cerebellum: fMRI evidence of somatotopic organization , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[24]  A Villringer,et al.  Somatotopic organization of human secondary somatosensory cortex. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  H. Freund,et al.  The role of the inferior parietal cortex in linking the tactile perception and manual construction of object shapes. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  H. Freund,et al.  Recognition and imitation of pantomimed motor acts after unilateral parietal and premotor lesions: a perspective on apraxia , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  D. Perrett,et al.  Neural Representation for the Perception of the Intentionality of Actions , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[28]  M Lotze,et al.  The representation of articulation in the primary sensorimotor cortex , 2000, Neuroreport.

[29]  R. J. Seitz,et al.  A fronto‐parietal circuit for object manipulation in man: evidence from an fMRI‐study , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[30]  E. Deibert,et al.  Neural pathways in tactile object recognition , 1999, Neurology.

[31]  A. Petersson,et al.  Occlusal appliance therapy in a short-term perspective in patients with temporomandibular disorders correlated to condyle position. , 1998, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[32]  J. Bower,et al.  Cerebellum Implicated in Sensory Acquisition and Discrimination Rather Than Motor Control , 1996, Science.

[33]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Functional Anatomy of Visuomotor Skill Learning in Human Subjects Examined with Positron Emission Tomography , 1996, The European journal of neuroscience.

[34]  R. Passingham,et al.  Relation between cerebral activity and force in the motor areas of the human brain. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  M. Torrens.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[36]  L. Cohen,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of mirroring during a unimanual force generation task. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  F. Mcdonald,et al.  Orthodontics for treating temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[38]  Michael Burke,et al.  Cortical Activation Patterns during Long-term Memory Retrieval of Visually or Haptically Encoded Objects and Locations , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  G. Carlsson,et al.  Critical review of some dogmas in prosthodontics. , 2009, Journal of prosthodontic research.

[40]  D. Cheyne,et al.  Three-dimensional localization of SMA activity preceding voluntary movement , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  M. Onozuka,et al.  Mapping brain region activity during chewing: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. , 2002, Journal of dental research.