Evaluating the performance of a MOSFET dosimeter at diagnostic X-ray energies for interventional radiology

For reducing the risk of skin injury during interventional radiology (IR) procedures, it has been suggested that physicians track patients’ exposure doses. The metal-oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeter is designed to measure patient exposure dose during radiotherapy applications at megavoltage photon energies. Our purpose in this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using a MOSFET dosimeter (OneDose system) to measure patients’ skin dose during exposure to diagnostic X-ray energies used in IR. The response of the OneDose system was almost constant at diagnostic X-ray energies, although the sensitivity was higher than that at megavoltage photon energies. We found that the angular dependence was minimal at diagnostic X-ray energies. The OneDose is almost invisible on X-ray images at diagnostic energies. Furthermore, the OneDose is easy to handle. The OneDose sensor performs well at diagnostic X-ray energies, although real-time measurements are not feasible. Thus, the OneDose system may prove useful in measuring patient exposure dose during IR.

[1]  Masayuki Zuguchi,et al.  Does digital acquisition reduce patients' skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures? An experimental study. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  R. Kohno,et al.  Dosimetric evaluation of a MOSFET detector for clinical application in photon therapy , 2008, Radiological physics and technology.

[3]  Jason P. Rehm,et al.  Images in clinical medicine. Radiation injury from a fluoroscopic procedure. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Y. Kagaya,et al.  Indicators of the maximum radiation dose to the skin during percutaneous coronary intervention in different target vessels , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[5]  Masayuki Zuguchi,et al.  Relationship between fluoroscopic time, dose-area product, body weight, and maximum radiation skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  S. Takahashi,et al.  Influence of the target vessel on the location and area of maximum skin dose during percutaneous coronary intervention , 2007, Acta radiologica.

[7]  S. Marcié,et al.  In vivo measurements with MOSFET detectors in oropharynx and nasopharynx intensity-modulated radiation therapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  J. Valentin,et al.  Abstract: Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures, ICRP Publication 85 , 2000 .

[9]  Stephen Balter,et al.  ACCF/AHA/HRS/SCAI clinical competence statement on physician knowledge to optimize patient safety and image quality in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task , 2005, Circulation.

[10]  Masayuki Zuguchi,et al.  Total entrance skin dose: an effective indicator of maximum radiation dose to the skin during percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Jason P. Rehm,et al.  Radiation Injury from a Fluoroscopic Procedure , 2004 .

[12]  R Ramaseshan,et al.  Performance characteristics of a microMOSFET as an in vivo dosimeter in radiation therapy. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  E Gaxiola,et al.  Real-time measurement of skin radiation during cardiac catheterization. , 1998, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.