State-space model estimation of EEG time series for classifying active brain sources

Electroencephalography (EEG) signals are known to be generated from the current source signals occurring inside human brains and these sources may or may not be active concurrently at a certain time. This paper aims to classify active and inactive sources from the information that can be inferred from parameters of a dynamical model that captures characteristics of EEG time series. We propose a state-space model for explaining coupled dynamics of the source and EEG signals where EEG is a linear combination of sources according to the characteristics of volume conduction. Our model has a structure that the sparsity pattern of the model output matrix can indicate the position of active and inactive sources. With this assumption, the proposed estimation method consists of two steps. Firstly, a subspace identification method is performed to estimate the dynamic matrix of the model and the mapping matrix from the state variable to EEG output. Secondly, the estimation of the output matrix in the state-space model from the mapping matrix is solved by a group lasso problem to promote a sparsity pattern. As a result, nonzero rows of the output matrix represent active source that corresponding to EEG data. We verify the performance of our method on randomly generated data sets that represent realistic human brain activities in a fair setting. An acceptable accuracy of 95 – 98% is obtained with a suitable selection of a problem parameter and a thresholding process to discard small magnitudes of the output matrix.

[1]  C. O’Brien Statistical Learning with Sparsity: The Lasso and Generalizations , 2016 .

[2]  Motoaki Kawanabe,et al.  Modeling Sparse Connectivity Between Underlying Brain Sources for EEG/MEG , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  G. Nolte,et al.  Analytic expansion of the EEG lead field for realistic volume conductors , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  A Simulation Framework for Benchmarking EEG-Based Brain Connectivity Estimation Methodologies , 2016, Brain Topography.

[5]  Karen O. Egiazarian,et al.  Measuring directional coupling between EEG sources , 2008, NeuroImage.

[6]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  Towards EEG source connectivity analysis , 2012 .

[7]  M. Murray,et al.  EEG source imaging , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  A. Seth,et al.  Granger causality for state-space models. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Giulio Tononi,et al.  Estimation of Cortical Connectivity From EEG Using State-Space Models , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Proximal Algorithms , 2013, Found. Trends Optim..

[11]  Saeid Sanei,et al.  EEG signal processing , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  Bart De Moor,et al.  Subspace Identification for Linear Systems: Theory ― Implementation ― Applications , 2011 .

[13]  Chee-Ming Ting,et al.  Modeling Effective Connectivity in High-Dimensional Cortical Source Signals , 2016, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[14]  Martin J. McKeown,et al.  A Generalized Multivariate Autoregressive (GmAR)-Based Approach for EEG Source Connectivity Analysis , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[15]  German Gomez-Herrero Brain Connectivity Analysis with EEG , 2010 .

[16]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Brainstorm: A User-Friendly Application for MEG/EEG Analysis , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..