Plant Information Systems, Manufacturing Capabilities, and Plant Performance

Firms have been investing over $5 billion a year in recent years on new information technology and software in their manufacturing plants. In this study, we develop a conceptual model based on the theory of dynamic capabilities to study how manufacturing plants realize improvements in plant performance by leveraging plant information systems to enable implementation of advanced manufacturing capabilities. We develop hypotheses about relationships between information systems, their impact on manufacturing practices, and the overall impact on plant performance. Analysis of survey data from 1,077 U.S. manufacturing plants provides empirical support for the dynamic capabilities model and suggests that manufacturing capabilities mediate the impact of information systems on plant performance. Our results underscore the importance of manufacturing and organizational capabilities in studying the impact of IT on manufacturing plant productivity, and provide a sharper theoretical lens to evaluate their impact.

[1]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validating Instruments in MIS Research , 1989, MIS Q..

[2]  N. Carr.  IT doesn't matter , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[3]  Sunder Kekre,et al.  Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of Electronic Data Interchange , 1995, MIS Q..

[4]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[5]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[6]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[7]  David Robertson,et al.  Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry , 1992 .

[8]  Jay Magidson,et al.  Advances in factor analysis and structural equation models , 1979 .

[9]  K. Srinivasan,et al.  Impact of Electronic Data Interchange Technology on JIT Shipments , 1994 .

[10]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[11]  Haim Mendelson,et al.  Clockspeed and Informational Response: Evidence from the Information Technology Industry , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance , 2000 .

[13]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[14]  Joan Magretta,et al.  The Power of Virtual Integration: An Interview with Dell Computer''s Michael Dell , 1998 .

[15]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  e-Business and Supply Chain Integration , 2004 .

[16]  Pierre Lasserre,et al.  Information as a substitute for inventories , 1986 .

[17]  J A Davy,et al.  A derivation of the underlying constructs of just-in-time management systems. , 1992, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[18]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective , 2003, MIS Q..

[19]  U. C. Bureau.  Statistical Abstract of the United States , 2004 .

[20]  T. C. Powell,et al.  Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human , 1997 .

[21]  G. Stock,et al.  Enterprise logistics and supply chain structure: the role of fit , 2000 .

[22]  T. Davenport.  Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[23]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Net-Enabled Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[24]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[25]  D. Siegel.  The Impact of Computers on Manufacturing Productivity Growth: A Multiple-Indicators, Multiple-Causes Approach , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[26]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[27]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[28]  E. James Flynn,et al.  INNOVATION HISTORY AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: A RESOURCE-BASED VIEW ANALYSIS OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONS. , 1995 .

[29]  Judy E. Scott,et al.  Implementing Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: The Role of Learning from Failure , 2000, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[30]  Mani Subramani,et al.  How Do Suppliers Benefit from Information Technology Use in Supply Chain Relationships? , 2004, MIS Q..

[31]  Elliot Rabinovich,et al.  Assessing the Effects of Operational Processes and Information Systems on Inventory Performance , 2006 .

[32]  K. Clark,et al.  Integration and Dynamic Capability: Evidence from Product Development in Automobiles and Mainframe Computers , 1994 .

[33]  K. B. Hendricks,et al.  Does Implementing an Effective TQM Program Actually Improve Operating Performance? Empirical Evidence from Firms That Have Won Quality Awards , 1997 .

[34]  Barry Wilkinson,et al.  Buyer-supplier relations in the UK - automotive industry: Strategic implications of the Japanese manufacturing model , 1992 .

[35]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[36]  L. Phillips.  Assessing Measurement Error in Key Informant Reports: A Methodological Note on Organizational Analysis in Marketing , 1981 .

[37]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Product development performance : strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry / Kim B. Clark, Tahahiro Fujimoto , 1991 .

[38]  A. Meyer,et al.  Lasting Improvements in Manufacturing Performance: In Search of a New Theory , 1990 .

[39]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link? , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[40]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[41]  D. Gerwin.  Manufacturing flexibility: a strategic perspective , 1993 .

[42]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Shaping UP for E-Commerce: Institutional Enablers of the Organizational Assimliation of Web Technologies , 2002, MIS Q..

[43]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[44]  Michael R. Vitale,et al.  Creating Competitive Advantage with Interorganizational Information Systems , 1988, MIS Q..

[45]  L. Willcocks,et al.  Core IS Capabilities for Exploiting Information Technology , 1998 .

[46]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[47]  Satish Nambisan,et al.  Information Systems as a Reference Discipline for New Product Development , 2003, MIS Q..

[48]  A. Roth,et al.  Operations as marketing: A competitive service strategy , 1991 .

[49]  V. Sambamurthy,et al.  Information Technology Assimilation in Firms: The Influence of Senior Leadership and IT Infrastructures , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[50]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  High performance manufacturing : global perspectives , 2001 .

[51]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[52]  M. Sobel.  Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[53]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Enterprise resource planning and organizational knowledge: patterns of convergence and divergence , 2000, ICIS.

[54]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Develop Long-Term Competitiveness through IT Assets , 1996 .

[55]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending , 1996 .

[56]  D. J. Wu,et al.  Investment in Enterprise Resource Planning: Business Impact and Productivity Measures , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[57]  J. Barney,et al.  CAPABILITIES, BUSINESS PROCESSES, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: CHOOSING THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2004 .

[58]  A. Roth,et al.  A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies , 1994 .

[59]  Bradley C. Wheeler,et al.  NEBIC: A Dynamic Capabilities Theory for Assessing Net-Enablement , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[60]  Shannon W. Anderson,et al.  Using Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) to Improve the Efficiency of Accounting Transactions , 2002 .

[61]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Measuring Information Technology Payoff: A Meta - Analysis of Structural Variables in Firm - Level Empirical Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[62]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[63]  Tridas Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Impact of electronic data interchange technology on quality improvement and inventory reduction programs: A field study , 1992 .

[64]  William L. Fuerst,et al.  Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis , 1995 .

[65]  Charles H. Kriebel,et al.  Information Technologies and Business Value: An Analytic and Empirical Investigation , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[66]  Nirup M. Menon,et al.  Productivity of Information Systems in the Healthcare Industry , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[67]  Vernon J. Richardson,et al.  Examining the Shareholder Wealth Effects of Announcements of Newly Created CIO Positions , 2001, MIS Q..

[68]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Work-Team Implementation and Trajectories of Manufacturing Quality: A Longitudinal Field Study , 2000, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[69]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Data analysis in social psychology. , 1998 .

[70]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Catching the wave: alertness, responsiveness, and market influence in global electronic networks , 1997 .

[71]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  e-Commerce Metrics for Net-Enhanced Organizations: Assessing the Value of e-Commerce to Firm Performance in the Manufacturing Sector , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[72]  K. Jöreskog,et al.  Intraclass Reliability Estimates: Testing Structural Assumptions , 1974 .

[73]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  The impact of just-in-time manufacturing and its infrastructure on manufacturing performance , 1997 .

[74]  M. Browne.  Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. , 1984, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[75]  G. Day.  The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations , 1994 .

[76]  Mikko A. Junttila,et al.  A resource-based view of manufacturing strategy and the relationship to manufacturing performance , 2002 .

[77]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[78]  J. Bakos,et al.  From vendors to partners: Information technology and incomplete contracts in buyer‐supplier relationships , 1993 .

[79]  Kannan Srinivasan,et al.  Information Technology Impact on Process Output and Quality , 1997 .

[80]  Ken Peffers,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology Investment Announcements on the Market Value of the Firm , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[81]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Information Technology As A Factor Of Production: The Role Of Differences Among Firms , 1995 .

[82]  Sunder Kekre,et al.  Strategic and Operational Benefits of Electronic Integration in B2B Procurement Processes , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[83]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .