Making Freehand their hand: the role of occupational therapy in implementing FES in tetraplegia

For persons with tetraplegia, improvements in function and independence are promoted by augmenting residual hand function. Assistive technology offers ways to enhance independence through enabling activities of daily living (ADL) performance. Splints and adaptive aids have traditionally been used to address functional hand deficits in persons with tetraplegia secondary to spinal injury. The Freehand System©R offers a brace free alternative for persons with C5 or C6 tetraplegia. By employing functional electrical stimulation (FES), The Freehand System©R provides stimulated grasp and release to paralyzed muscles of the hand. Occupational therapy plays an important role in assessment and implementation of the Freehand System. Clinical reasoning is used to develop a comprehensive plan for surgical planning, rehabilitation and functional training to meet individual needs. Training incorporates education on operation and care of the system and functional application toward valued ADL. Research with the Freehand system is ongoing. Clinical trials of the Freehand system with both adult and adolescent subjects have demonstrated measurable improvement in pinch force, hand function and level of independence in ADL [9,12]. Current focus of research by occupational therapists with the Freehand system has been the examination of home use and user satisfaction.

[1]  E. Drake,et al.  Reconstructive hand surgery for quadriplegic persons. , 1985, American Journal of Occupational Therapy.

[2]  K. Kilgore,et al.  Tendon transfers and functional electrical stimulation for restoration of hand function in spinal cord injury. , 1996, The Journal of hand surgery.

[3]  Rogers Jc,et al.  Traumatic quadriplegia: follow-up study of self-care skills. , 1980 .

[4]  E. Roth,et al.  Functional skills after spinal cord injury rehabilitation: three-year longitudinal follow-up. , 1988, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  P. H. Peckham,et al.  An Implanted Upper-Extremity Neuroprosthesis. Follow-up of Five Patients* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  J O'MalleyTeeter A review of the functional electrical stimulation equipment market. , 1992 .

[7]  Patient selection for an upper extremity neuroprosthesis in tetraplegic individuals , 1997, Spinal Cord.

[8]  R. Welch,et al.  Functional independence in quadriplegia: critical levels. , 1986, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  M J Mulcahey,et al.  Implanted functional electrical stimulation hand system in adolescents with spinal injuries: an evaluation. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  Opportunities and challenges for the clinical utilization of functional electrical stimulation. , 1992 .

[11]  K. Kilgore,et al.  Implantable functional neuromuscular stimulation in the tetraplegic hand. , 1989, The Journal of hand surgery.