The circumstances that led to my becoming an authority on the lie detector were adventitious, to say the least. During the summer of 1958, I was made responsible for the supervision and employment of two freshman medical students who had been awarded summer fellowships. Medical students, in my experience, tend to be very energetic and generally competent. My two summer fellows presented me with an unusual problem. They tore into the work with which I had planned to keep them busy for 3 months and finished in the space of a few weeks. In some desperation, I set them to building a fence around my back garden while I studied the matter. The fence, a week’s work for two ordinary persons, was completed in a day and a half but by then I had contrived their next assignment.
[1]
P. J. Bersh.
A validation study of polygraph examiner judgments.
,
1969,
The Journal of applied psychology.
[2]
The effect of selected variables on interpretation of polygraph records.
,
1977
.
[3]
D. Lykken.
The GSR in the detection of guilt.
,
1959
.
[4]
P. Meehl,et al.
Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores.
,
1955,
Psychological bulletin.
[5]
David T. Lykken,et al.
The validity of the guilty knowledge technique: The effects of faking.
,
1960
.
[6]
D. Kipnis,et al.
Metamorphic effects of power.
,
1976
.